The Short-term Effect of Low-load Resistance Training with Blood-flow Restriction on Somatosensory-evoked Potentials in Healthy Young Adults

NCT ID: NCT06762912

Last Updated: 2025-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-20

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the short-term effect of lower limb BFRT on the somatosensory processing and related changes in SSEP amplitude and latency. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is there an effect of short-term application of BFRT on the somatosensory system?
* How do different cuff widths affect the somatosensory system?
* How do three different cuff widths affect perceived pain? Researchers will compare 3 different cuff widths to see if different cuff widths affect the somatosensory system and perceived pain.

Participants will:

* Undergo 3 experimental sessions, sessions will be separated by 72 hours and the order of the sessions to be randomly selected.
* Perform low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The current study will be conducted in the college of health sciences, physiotherapy department, in the medical campus in the University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. The study design is a Randomized Crossover Trial, which will include three groups of healthy young adults, each group will use a different cuff widths (small cuff width (5 cm), medium cuff width (12 cm), and large cuff width (18 cm)). Participants in all three groups will undergo three experimental sessions in a random order, which will include the application of a blood flow restriction cuff combined with resistance exercise, the application of a blood flow restriction cuff without resistance exercise, and traditional resistance exercise without a blood flow restriction cuff. During each session, SSEP measurements will be recorded at three time points: before, during, and after the experimental session by stimulating the tibial nerve at the ankle and measuring the SSEP amplitude and latency.

Healthy young adults aged 18-30 years of both genders will be recruited through word of mouth and through social media by sharing the study flyer. Then, they will be screened for their eligibility to participate in the current study. Participants who will meet the eligibility criteria will be asked to provide their consent after the study is explained by filling out the consent form.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups: (1) small cuff width (5 cm), (2) medium cuff width (12 cm), and (3) large cuff width (18 cm) by using permuted block randomization method with large, random, and variable block sizes to ensure groups are balanced and selection bias is minimized.

The first experimental session will start by conducting the one repetition maximum (1-RM) test of unilateral knee extension of the dominant leg, in which the dominant side was identified by asking the participants which side they will use to kick a ball. Before conducting the 1-RM test, 5 minutes warm-up on the cycle ergometer at 75W will be done. Calibration of the dynamometer will be done before operating the machine with each participant, then the participant will be positioned on the dynamometer seat comfortably with ensuring the back is supported and the knee is aligned with the axis of rotation. The participant will be asked to complete one successful repetition of knee extension through full range of motion (ROM), with increasing load until the participant can no longer complete full knee extension ROM, 3 minutes of rest will be allowed between attempts until the 1-RM is identified. To eliminate the effect of fatigue after 1-RM test, the first experimental session will always include the application of the BFR cuff without resistance exercise.

For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP.

The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

The Current Study Focuses on Investigating the Short-term Effect of BFRT on the Somatosensory System Among Healthy Young Adults

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups: small cuff width (5 cm), medium cuff width (12 cm), and large cuff width (18 cm). Each participant in all three groups will enroll in the three experimental sessions in a random order. All experimental sessions will be provided by the same physiotherapist to minimize the inter-rater variations.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Passive application of BFR cuff

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Passive application of BFR cuff

Intervention Type OTHER

The first experimental session will start by conducting the one repetition maximum (1-RM) test of unilateral knee extension of the dominant leg, in which the dominant side was identified by asking the participants which side they will use to kick a ball. Before conducting the 1-RM test, 5 minutes warm-up on the cycle ergometer at 75W will be done. Calibration of the dynamometer will be done before operating the machine with each participant, then the participant will be positioned on the dynamometer seat comfortably with ensuring the back is supported and the knee is aligned with the axis of rotation. The participant will be asked to complete one successful repetition of knee extension through full range of motion (ROM), with increasing load until the participant can no longer complete full knee extension ROM, 3 minutes of rest will be allowed between attempts until the 1-RM is identified.

Resistance exercise with BFR

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Resistance exercise with BFR

Intervention Type OTHER

For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP.

The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours).

Resistance exercise without BFR

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Resistance exercise without BFR

Intervention Type OTHER

For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP.

The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Passive application of BFR cuff

The first experimental session will start by conducting the one repetition maximum (1-RM) test of unilateral knee extension of the dominant leg, in which the dominant side was identified by asking the participants which side they will use to kick a ball. Before conducting the 1-RM test, 5 minutes warm-up on the cycle ergometer at 75W will be done. Calibration of the dynamometer will be done before operating the machine with each participant, then the participant will be positioned on the dynamometer seat comfortably with ensuring the back is supported and the knee is aligned with the axis of rotation. The participant will be asked to complete one successful repetition of knee extension through full range of motion (ROM), with increasing load until the participant can no longer complete full knee extension ROM, 3 minutes of rest will be allowed between attempts until the 1-RM is identified.

Intervention Type OTHER

Resistance exercise with BFR

For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP.

The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours).

Intervention Type OTHER

Resistance exercise without BFR

For both experimental sessions 2 and 3, the order of exercise condition will be randomly selected, either to be (1) the application of BFR cuff with resistance exercise, or (2) resistance exercise without the application of BFR cuff to decrease the incidence of learning effect. Cuff pressure during the application of BFR will be standardized to 50% of AOP.

The resistance exercise for both experimental sessions 2 and 3 will be exactly similar and will involve four sets of isometric knee extensions at an intensity of 20% of 1-RM with repetitions of 30, 15, 15, and 15 by using the isokinetic dynamometer machine, which has a good to excellent test-retest reliability for knee extension movement with ICC value of 0.95-0.99. To minimize cognitive and neuromuscular fatigue, the experimental sessions will be separated by a minimum of three days (72 hours).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants will be included if they are aged 18-30 years of both genders, with no history of cardiovascular problems or osteo-articular problems in the lower limbs, and if they responded negatively to all items of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q).
* Participants will be included if they have a body mass index (BMI) less than 25 or non-overweight individuals.
* Use of the long international physical activity questionnaire (L-IPAQ) to ensure all participants have equal physical activity levels.

* Participants will be excluded if they were diagnosed with any neurological disease.
* Participants will be excluded if they have had any musculoskeletal injury in the past 3 months to avoid potential effect on their physical activity levels.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sharjah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Taif A. M. Omran

Master's Student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Sharjah

Sharjah city, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Arab Emirates

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Taif A. M. Omran, Master's Student

Role: CONTACT

+971551610573

Dr. Tamer Mohamed Shousha, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+971562224469

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Prof. Ibrahim Mostafa Abuamr, PhD

Role: primary

+97165057513

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yusof, N., (2019). Likert Scale vs. Visual analogue scale on vehicle seat discomfort questionnaire: a review. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 15(204).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Muzyka IM, Estephan B. Somatosensory evoked potentials. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:523-540. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00035-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31277874 (View on PubMed)

Li X, Li J, Qing L, Wang H, Ma H, Huang P. Effect of quadriceps training at different levels of blood flow restriction on quadriceps strength and thickness in the mid-term postoperative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled external pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 8;24(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06483-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37158913 (View on PubMed)

Wanner M, Probst-Hensch N, Kriemler S, Meier F, Autenrieth C, Martin BW. Validation of the long international physical activity questionnaire: Influence of age and language region. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Mar 9;3:250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.003. eCollection 2016 Jun.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27419023 (View on PubMed)

Korakakis V, Whiteley R, Giakas G. Low load resistance training with blood flow restriction decreases anterior knee pain more than resistance training alone. A pilot randomised controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Nov;34:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30268966 (View on PubMed)

Sousa J, Neto GR, Santos HH, Araujo JP, Silva HG, Cirilo-Sousa MS. Effects of strength training with blood flow restriction on torque, muscle activation and local muscular endurance in healthy subjects. Biol Sport. 2017 Mar;34(1):83-90. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.63738. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28416903 (View on PubMed)

Shousha T, Alayat M, Moustafa I. Effects of low-level laser therapy versus soft occlusive splints on mouth opening and surface electromyography in females with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized-controlled study. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 1;16(10):e0258063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258063. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34597318 (View on PubMed)

Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res. 2018 Apr 26;11:851-856. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S158847. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29731662 (View on PubMed)

Cidem M, Sahin Z, Aydin T, Aysal F. Somatosensory evoked potential findings in ankylosing spondylitis. Eurasian J Med. 2014 Feb;46(1):42-6. doi: 10.5152/eajm.2013.100.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25610293 (View on PubMed)

Tuominen J, Leppanen M, Jarske H, Pasanen K, Vasankari T, Parkkari J. Test-Retest Reliability of Isokinetic Ankle, Knee and Hip Strength in Physically Active Adults Using Biodex System 4 Pro. Methods Protoc. 2023 Mar 9;6(2):26. doi: 10.3390/mps6020026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36961046 (View on PubMed)

Maudrich T, Degener S, Ragert P, Kenville R. The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults. Exp Physiol. 2024 Nov;109(11):1869-1881. doi: 10.1113/EP091911. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39233383 (View on PubMed)

Fatela P, Reis JF, Mendonca GV, Avela J, Mil-Homens P. Acute effects of exercise under different levels of blood-flow restriction on muscle activation and fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 May;116(5):985-95. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3359-1. Epub 2016 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27017495 (View on PubMed)

Ilett MJ, Rantalainen T, Keske MA, May AK, Warmington SA. The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise. Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1018. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01018. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31456694 (View on PubMed)

van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel REH. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 29;12(12):e0189876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189876. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29287067 (View on PubMed)

Carter, K., Scheffold, A. L., Renteria, J., Berger, V. W., Luo, Y. A., Chipman, J. J., & Sverdlov, O. (2024). Regulatory Guidance on Randomization and the Use of Randomization Tests in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 16(4), 428-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/19466315.2023.2239521

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Broglio K. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Permuted Blocks and Stratification. JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2223-2224. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6360. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29872845 (View on PubMed)

Patterson SD, Hughes L, Warmington S, Burr J, Scott BR, Owens J, Abe T, Nielsen JL, Libardi CA, Laurentino G, Neto GR, Brandner C, Martin-Hernandez J, Loenneke J. Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety. Front Physiol. 2019 May 15;10:533. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31156448 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BFRT-SSEP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of WB-EMS in Runners.
NCT03425981 COMPLETED NA
Application of Manual Therapy to Archers
NCT06747104 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA