Blood Flow Restriction Training For The Treatment Of Lateral Epicondylopathy

NCT ID: NCT07172568

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-25

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction Training for the treatment of lateral elbow epicondylopathy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. To test a non-invasive, rapid treatment option for epicondylopathia humeri radialis for its effectiveness, Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training will be supplemented to the applied exercise therapy. In BFR training, blood flow to the muscle is reduced by tying off the limb to be trained, e.g. with a blood pressure cuff, to achieve mechanical compression of the underlying blood vessels. This results in increased accumulation of blood in the capillary bed distal to the pressure cuff. Although isolated adverse effects have been reported, based on the current literature, it can be assumed that BFR training is comparable to conventional training in terms of safety for the user. Regarding the effect of BFR applications, it has been shown that even BFR without additional training measures can reduce muscle atrophy occurring during immobilization. A systematic literature review confirmed the positive effect of BFR augmented strength training in terms of strength development as well as muscle gain. The first positive results of BFR training compared to conventional physiotherapy have already been shown in rehabilitation after replacement surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament and after treatment of a radius fracture. Therefore, there is a scientific interest to verify the effectivity of this method in another disease of the musculoskeletal system, epicondylopathia humeri radialis.

Question: Does the implementation of a BFR-protocol in the physiotherapeutic treatment of epicondylopathia humeri radialis lead to a significantly pain relief and function improvement in the affected hand? Hypothesis: The implementation of a BFR-protocol in the physiotherapeutic treatment leads to a significantly pain relief an function improvement in comparison to a cohort without BFR.
2. All patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be informed about the study in the special consultation for shoulder and elbow diseases and asked whether they would like to participate and will receive a declaration of participation if they agree. Patients are informed in detail that participation is voluntary, and that non-participation will not result in any disadvantages for their treatment. Prior to the start of therapy, one of the above-mentioned study physicians will personally inform the patient about the risks and benefits of the study. After sufficient time for reflection, the corresponding declaration of participation is gone through with the patient, signed by both parties in case of consent and the patient receives a copy of it. After signing the participation form, an appointment will be made to start the six-week randomized physiotherapy (2x per week a 20min; group A: Physiotherapy + BFR while intermittently wearing the BFR cuff (Delfi Medical Innocation Inc., Vancouver, Canada) at 50% of arterial occlusion pressure analogous to previous studies; Group B Physiotherapy + sham-BFR (BFR cuff inflated to 20mmHg). Patients are informed that they can discontinue therapy without giving a reason.

Physiotherapy treatment will be performed according to the current evidence-based protocol in the Department and Polyclinic for Sports Orthopedics of the Klinikum rechts der Isar of the Technical University of Munich twice a week over a period of six weeks. Randomization will be done by the treating physiotherapist(s) before the first physiotherapy session. Before the start of the first therapy unit (T1), as well as after completion of the six-week intervention (T2), six weeks after completion of therapy (T3) and again 12 weeks aufter completion of the physiotherapeutic treatment (T4), both clinical examinations to assess the progress of therapy by a blinded study physician and the completion of a standardized questionnaire by the subject will take place. No travel or expense allowance is provided. During the clinical examination, the joint status as well as the clinical signs of epicondylopathia radialis humeri will be collected. Further data collection is performed by means of questionnaires.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Elbow Tendinopathy Elbow, Tennis Lateral Epicondylitis Epicondylitis of the Elbow Blood Flow Restriction Therapy BFR

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

It's a Randomized Controlled Trial, double blinded. The participant and the investigator are blinded and have no information about the group affiliation.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The Participant is randomly assigned to a cohort by drawing a number. Only the attending physiotherapist knows which number belongs to which cohort and start then either the BFR-training or the sham-BFR. The examining doctor in the preliminary investigation and in the follow-ups does not know how the patients were treated. Also the outcomes assessor has no informations about the treatment of the patients, therefore the assessment of the results is also carried out blindly.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

20mmHg pressure Blood Flow Restriction

The patients in the control group are wearing a blood-flow-restriction cuff proximal to the elbow with an applied pressure of just 20mmHg. Studies have shown that this amount of pressure has no impact. The control group remains blind using the cuff with low pressure. The therapy protocol is exactly the same as in the Interventional group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sham-Blood Flow Restriction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the control group, 20 mmHg are applied to the extremity during exercises.

50% of Mean arterial blood pressure Blood Flow Restriction

The patients in the intervention group are wearing a blood-flow-restriction cuff proximal to the elbow with an applied pressure of 50% of the mean arterial blood pressure. The therapy protocol is exactly the same as in the control group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blood Flow Restriction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the intervention group, 50% of limb occlussion pressure are applied to the extremity during exercises.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Blood Flow Restriction

In the intervention group, 50% of limb occlussion pressure are applied to the extremity during exercises.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sham-Blood Flow Restriction

In the control group, 20 mmHg are applied to the extremity during exercises.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis
* duration of symptoms \> 6 weeks
* failed physical therapy
* absence of x-ray abnormalities
* written and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* prior joint infiltrations
* duration of symptoms \> 12 months
* concomitant rheumatoid diseases
* concomitant elbow pathologies, including medial epicondylitis
* concomitant radicular symptoms of the cervical spine, shoulder or hand
* traumatic etiology of symptoms
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maximilian Hinz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alexandros Doucas, MD

Role: CONTACT

+491737442245

Pavel Kadantsev, MD

Role: CONTACT

+4915221021120

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maximilian Hinz, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hinz M, Franz A, Pirker C, Traimer S, Lappen S, Doucas A, Siebenlist S. [Blood flow restriction training as a treatment option for lateral elbow tendinopathy-a study presentation]. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 May;52(5):365-370. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04370-w. Epub 2023 Apr 20. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37079041 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

245/21 S-NP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.