Arterial Stiffness for Improved Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease by Coronary CT Angiography
NCT ID: NCT06734247
Last Updated: 2024-12-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-24
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Aortic Stiffness as a Prognostic Indicator of Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve by Multimodal Imaging
NCT03474159
HeartFlowNXT - HeartFlow Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using Coronary CT Angiography
NCT01757678
Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using Dynamic PET/CTA Fused Imagery
NCT04221594
MRI and Computational Simulation Cardiology Study
NCT03149341
Measurement of Heart-carotid Pulse Wave Velocity (hcPWV) by Laser Doppler Vibrometry (LDV)
NCT05711693
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2024, the ESC Guidelines were updated to recommend an updated clinical assessment method, the risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (RF-CL), which is based on symtoms and number of risk factors. It has been shown to have better predictive ability compared to PTP alone, but is still largely based on epidemiological data, which may not be valid for all individuals.
Coronary computer tomography angiography (CCTA) is the method becoming increasingly established at low-intermediate risk. An initial, non-invasive strategy with CCTA compared to invasive or more advanced examinations is safe and simple. At the same time, CCTA is resource-intensive, with limited availability, and the examination involves both contrast, radiation and incidental findings. Thus, there is a need to improve the risk estimation.
Arterial stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity is an independent marker for cardiovascular events and has been shown to be independently associated with the degree of coronary artery disease. Arterial stiffness is, however, rarely measured in the clinic as it traditionally has required cumbersome procedures. Newer methods include the brachial single cuff-based Arteriograph and the optical technique photoplethysmography (PPG), widely available in healthcare pulse oximeters, but increasingly also in different consumer devices, often complemented by single-lead ECG.
The main aim of this study is to evaluate arterial stiffness and its possible role to improve risk stratification of patients undergoing CCTA for potential coronary artery disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Coronary computer tomography angiography (CCTA)
Use of standard equipment for usual care
Photoplethysmography (PPG) and single-lead ECG
Physiological data acquisition equipment
Brachial single cuff-based arterial stiffness
Use of standard equipment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 30 to \<70 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known significant cardiac (\> moderate valvular disease, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or congenital heart disease), or pulmonary condition which could explain symptoms.
* Known ongoing atrial fibrillation/flutter.
* No Swedish social security number.
* Unable to provide written informed consent.
30 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
OTHER
Danderyd Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonas Spaak, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Danderyd University Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HW2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.