Validation of the Accuracy of a Novel POCT Dry Blood Gas Analyzer in Acute Care Settings

NCT ID: NCT06726473

Last Updated: 2025-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

216 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-17

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to validate the performance of the novel POCT dry blood gas analyzer EG-i30, against the currently widely used traditional wet blood gas analyzer, Radiometer ABL90, in acute care settings. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. How consistent are the results between EG-i30 and ABL90 in acute care settings, including outliers, correlation, linearity, and bias?
2. Whether EG-i30 can be considered a suitable alternative to ABL90 in acute care settings.

Participants will be patients in the emergency department who will undergo simultaneous testing with EG-i30 and ABL90 during their emergency care to assess the performance of EG-i30.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This observational study aims to compare the performance of two blood gas analyzers, the EG-i30 dry blood gas analyzer and the ABL90 wet blood gas analyzer, in an emergency department (ED) or emergency intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The study will evaluate the consistency, correlation, and bias between the two analyzers for various blood gas and biochemical parameters, such as Potential of hydrogen (pH), Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), Sodium (Na+), Potassium (K+), Chloride (Cl-), Ionized calcium (iCa2+), Lactate (Lac), Glucose (Glu), and Hematocrit (Hct). The study design is observational, with no intervention or treatment assigned to the participants. The comparison will be made using residual blood samples collected as part of routine care, following standard clinical procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure Acid-Base Balance Disorder Sepsis Shock Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1: ABL90 Group

Blood gas and biochemical measurements are performed using the ABL90 blood gas analyzer. The results will be compared with those from the EG-i30 analyzer.

Wet Blood Gas Analyzer (ABL90)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

This group involves the use of the ABL90 wet blood gas analyzer for measuring arterial whole blood samples. The results obtained from the ABL90 analyzer will be compared with those obtained from the EG-i30 dry blood gas analyzer

Group 2: EG-i30 Group

Blood gas and biochemical measurements are performed using the EG-i30 blood gas analyzer. The results will be compared with those from the ABL90 analyzer.

Dry Blood Gas Analyzer (EG-i30)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

This group involves the use of the EG-i30 dry blood gas analyzer for measuring arterial whole blood samples. The results obtained from the EG-i30 analyzer will be compared with those obtained from the ABL90 wet blood gas analyzer.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Wet Blood Gas Analyzer (ABL90)

This group involves the use of the ABL90 wet blood gas analyzer for measuring arterial whole blood samples. The results obtained from the ABL90 analyzer will be compared with those obtained from the EG-i30 dry blood gas analyzer

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Dry Blood Gas Analyzer (EG-i30)

This group involves the use of the EG-i30 dry blood gas analyzer for measuring arterial whole blood samples. The results obtained from the EG-i30 analyzer will be compared with those obtained from the ABL90 wet blood gas analyzer.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are scheduled to undergo arterial blood gas analysis in the emergency department (ED) or emergency intensive care unit (EICU).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a confirmed history of infectious diseases such as hepatitis B, syphilis, HIV/AIDS, etc.
* Patients whose residual blood samples are not tested within the specified time frame after collection.
* Other patients deemed ineligible by the investigator (e.g., samples with contamination or other factors affecting sample quality).
Minimum Eligible Age

28 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhujiang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lixia Yang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Organization

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Organization

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Breathnach CS. The development of blood gas analysis. Med Hist. 1972 Jan;16(1):51-62. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300017257. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4558439 (View on PubMed)

Shapiro BA. The history of pH and blood gas analysis. Respir Care Clin N Am. 1995 Sep;1(1):1-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9390846 (View on PubMed)

Davis MD, Walsh BK, Sittig SE, Restrepo RD. AARC clinical practice guideline: blood gas analysis and hemoximetry: 2013. Respir Care. 2013 Oct;58(10):1694-703. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02786. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23901131 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-KY-408-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sepsis Metabolomics
NCT01649440 COMPLETED