A Study to Test Whether BI 771716 Helps People With an Advanced Form of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Called Geographic Atrophy

NCT ID: NCT06722157

Last Updated: 2025-12-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

202 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-06

Study Completion Date

2026-10-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is open to people 50 years or older with an eye condition called geographic atrophy. The purpose of this study is to compare a medicine called BI 771716 with a medicine called pegcetacoplan. BI 771716 is being developed to treat people with geographic atrophy. Pegcetacoplan is a medicine already used to treat people with geographic atrophy.

In this study, participants receive either BI 771716 or pegcetacoplan as injections in the eye.

Participants are in the study for a little longer than a year and visit the study site every 4 weeks. At the visits, the study doctor checks the eyes of the participants. The results are compared between the groups of participants to see whether the treatment works. The study doctor also regularly checks participants' health and takes note of any unwanted effects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Macular Degeneration, Age-related Geographic Atrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: BI 771716

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BI 771716

Intervention Type DRUG

BI 771716

Arm B: BI 771716 and Sham comparator

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BI 771716

Intervention Type DRUG

BI 771716

Sham comparator to BI 771716

Intervention Type DRUG

Sham comparator to BI 771716

Arm C: Pegcetacoplan

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pegcetacoplan

Intervention Type DRUG

Pegcetacoplan

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BI 771716

BI 771716

Intervention Type DRUG

Pegcetacoplan

Pegcetacoplan

Intervention Type DRUG

Sham comparator to BI 771716

Sham comparator to BI 771716

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Syfovre ®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age at least 50 years old at the time of randomization visit
* Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with International Council on Harmonisation - Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation prior to admission to the trial
* Male or female participants. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria and instructions on the duration of use are provided in the participant information. Male participants must be ready and able to use either a condom or abstinence as contraceptive measures
* Diagnosis of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), where the total GA lesion area must be ≥2.5 square millimetres (mm²) and ≤17.5 mm² as measured by Fundus autofluorescence (FAF)

* If multiple lesions are present in the study eye, at least 1 lesion must have an area of ≥1.25 mm²
* Note: Fellow eye is not required to have GA
* Note: subfoveal GA lesions (defined as GA lesions within 1 micron of the foveal center point) will be allowed to be enrolled until a maximum is reached of 36 subfoveal lesions in the entire trial (36 is 20% of the total trial population of 180 participants). No more than 36 participants with subfoveal GA lesions should be enrolled. After the maximum of 36 participants is reached, then any participants with subfoveal GA lesions should not be enrolled
* Fellow eye must have sufficient visual function compared to the study eye, per the investigator's medical judgment in consultation with the patient, to support the patient's daily functioning
* BCVA letter score of ≥24 letters, using the ETDRS chart in the study eye (equivalent to ≥20/320 on the Snellen chart). Note: If both eyes meet eligibility criteria, the eye with the worse visual function per the investigator's medical judgment in consultation with the patient, will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes have similar visual function, the study eye will be selected per the investigator's medical judgment in consultation with the patient

Exclusion Criteria

* GA lesions whose area cannot be accurately defined in the study eye
* Exudative neovascular AMD (eAMD) in the study eye

\-- Note: eAMD in the fellow eye is allowed
* Previously received treatment in the study eye for GA secondary to AMD within 4 months or 5 half-lives prior to baseline, whichever is longer
* Previously received an investigational medication (oral or intravitreal) for GA secondary to AMD within 4 months or 5 half-lives prior to baseline, whichever is longer
* Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial, or 30 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer since ending another investigational device or drug trial(s) or receiving other investigational treatment(s). Any previous use of gene therapy or cell therapy is not permitted
* Additional eye disease as follows:

* Any eye disease in the study eye that could compromise BCVA
* Uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension with intraocular pressure \>24 millimetre of mercury (mmHg) in study eye
* History of high myopia \>8 diopters in the study eye
* Anterior segment and vitreous abnormalities that would preclude adequate observation with spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the study eye
* Ocular conditions at the discretion of the investigator that might interfere with outcome of the trial in the study eye
* Active intraocular inflammation in the study eye
* Active infectious conjunctivitis in either eye
* Prior vitrectomy surgery in the study eye
* History of major intraocular surgeries including major corneal surgery. Uneventful cataract surgery, refractive surgery, oculoplastic surgery, strabismus surgery, and other extraocular surgery may be permitted if they have occurred more than 3 months prior to baseline in the study eye
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boehringer Ingelheim

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Associated Retina Consultants

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Associated Retina Consultants, Ltd.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix Retina Associates

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Retina Macula Institute of Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Global Research Management

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Southern California

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants Medical Group, Inc

Modesto, California, United States

Site Status

Eye Research Foundation

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of San Diego

Poway, California, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants Medical Group

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Bay Area Retina Associates - Walnut Creek

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Retina Associates

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Connecticut Eye Consultants, PC

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Retina Group of New England, PC

Waterford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Rand Eye Institute

Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Retina Group of Florida

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Eye Associates of Pinellas

Pinellas Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Retina Vitreous Associates of Florida

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Southeast Retina Center, PC

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University Retina and Macula Associates

Lemont, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Illinois Retina Associates - Oak Park

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Butchertown Clinical Trials

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Mid Atlantic Retina Specialists

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Minnesota

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mississippi Retina Associates

Madison, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

University of Missouri Health System

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Envision Ocular, LLC

Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Eye Associates of New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Long Island Vitreoretinal Consultants - Westbury

Westbury, New York, United States

Site Status

Verum Research, LLC

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Mid Atlantic Retina - Bethlehem

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston Neuroscience Institute - Charleston

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Tennessee Retina

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin Clinical Research, LLC

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas-Beaumont-70319

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas-Bellaire-67493

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Foundation of the Southwest

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas - Katy

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

Red River Research Partners, LLC

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retinal Consultants of San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas - Schertz

Schertz, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas-The Woodlands-67575

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Eye Center

Lynchburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane Eye Clinic

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Puerto Rico United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1308-7923

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1497-0002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id