Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane Block Versus Intraperitoneal Irrigation of Local Anesthetic for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT ID: NCT06714279
Last Updated: 2025-08-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE1
144 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-12
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Keyhole gallbladder surgery is typically performed under general anaesthesia (or while the patient is 'fully asleep'), however doctors use other pain relief types to reduce pain after the operation. One of these options is local anaesthetic, which involves the injection of an medication into or onto the part of the body which has been operated on. The reason for doing this is to reduce the pain felt by the patient in the part if the body where the operation occurred. The best way of using these medications remain unclear.
The local anaesthetic being used in the study is fully approved for use in Ireland and the drug itself is not being tested. In other words, the drug is not an experimental drug. Local anaesthetic drugs are given in different ways in patients who have just had the keyhole surgery on their gall bladder (this is the surgery that you are about to have).
Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare two ways of giving patients these local anaesthetic medications following key-hole gallbladder surgery. These include (1) injecting the medication into the skin at the surgical wounds and squirting it onto the liver (where the gallbladder has been removed from), or (2) injecting the medication into the skin at the surgical wounds and into the muscles in the abdomen (known formally as a transversus abdominus plane block).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Unilateral Laparoscopic TAP Block vs. Local Infiltration in Post-Cholecystectomy Analgesia
NCT07176299
Intraperitoneal Techniques of Local Anaesthesia During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01090882
Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block
NCT05094193
Postoperative Pain Difference for 'IV Paracetamol' and TAP Block' in Acute Cholecystitis
NCT04767542
Comparison of Oblique Subcostal, Posterior or Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04693156
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite these recommendations, there remains ambiguity in the surgical literature surrounding to the optimal strategy for the infiltration of local anaesthetic; previous data has coherently demonstrated the superiority of surgical site wound infiltration, intraperitoneal infiltration and intra-abdominal wall blocks with local anaesthetic agents in reducing post-operative pain relative to placebo. In particular, data from a previous randomised clinical trial (RCT) has indicated that infiltrating the gallbladder fossa with local anaesthetic is more effective in reducing post-operative pain than local wound infiltration, however these results were subsequently refuted in a sequential RCT, leaving ambiguity as to the effect of this technique in reducing post-operative pain. Furthermore, recent RCTs have demonstrated that infiltration of local anaesthetic into either transversus abdominus plane (TAP) or the rectus sheath intraoperatively reduced post-operative pain compared to infiltration into the wound alone, directly reducing the post-operative morphine requirement. While ultrasound-guided transversus abdominus plane (US-TAP) are now commonly utilised in the perioperative setting following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the suitability of a laparoscopic-guided approach (L-TAP) has been less well established within the surgical literature.
Given the contrasting results of these previous studies, there remains no consensus as to the validity of using L-TAP or intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic to the liver bed as contemporary modes of delivering local anaesthetic following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to perform a prospective, randomised study evaluating the benefit of L-TAP or intraperitoneal infiltration in patients indicated to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study is a parallel two-arm study which will evaluate outcomes following local anesthetic infiltration (1) directly into the laparoscopic port sites combined with intraperitoneal infiltration, and (2) directly into the laparoscopic port sites combined with laparoscopic infiltration via TAP block.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Group - Tap Block
Study Group: Study group: Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane in four points: above the umbilicus on the left side; dose calculation 2.5mg per body weight.
After the cholecystectomy is done and just before withdrawing port and deflating the abdomen, the operating surgeon will advance a needle into the abdominal wall to the level of the preperitoneal space. Once the needle tip is seen, it is withdrawn slowly and gently about 0.5cm above/superficial to the transversus abdominis (TA) muscle. The surgeon then infiltrates the local anaesthetic into the plane, and the right plane is confirmed by visualising a uniform protrusion downwards of the TA muscle fibres (Doyle's bulge). Seeing a preperitoneal or muscle blister laparoscopically indicates that the infiltration is deeper to this plane, and the needle should be withdrawn more superficially.
Tap Block - Bupivacaine
The medicinal product for both groups is the same - Bupivacaine. The mode of administration is what this study is reviewing: Control group (Intraperitoneal infiltration to liver) and Study Group - Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LTap Block)
Control Group - Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic onto Liver
Administration of local anesthetic to the liver using, dose calculation 2.5mg per body weight.
Intraperitoneal infiltration to liver
The medicinal product for both groups is the same - Bupivacaine. The mode of administration is what this study is reviewing: Control group (Intraperitoneal infiltration to liver) and Study Group - Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LTap Block)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tap Block - Bupivacaine
The medicinal product for both groups is the same - Bupivacaine. The mode of administration is what this study is reviewing: Control group (Intraperitoneal infiltration to liver) and Study Group - Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LTap Block)
Intraperitoneal infiltration to liver
The medicinal product for both groups is the same - Bupivacaine. The mode of administration is what this study is reviewing: Control group (Intraperitoneal infiltration to liver) and Study Group - Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LTap Block)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Matthew Davey
Specialist Registrar in General Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arnold DK Hill, MB MCh FRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
RCSI
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beaumont Hospital
Dublin, , Ireland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24.71
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.