Nerve Blocks vs Local Injections for Post-op Pain Prevention in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children

NCT ID: NCT03022279

Last Updated: 2023-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

87 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-06

Study Completion Date

2022-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to compare transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks to local wound infiltration (LWI) in terms of postoperative pain control in pediatric patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our hypothesis is that TAP blocks will be superior to LWI for postoperative pain control resulting in decreased use of opioid / narcotic pain medication and decreased pain scored in the immediate 24-hour postoperative period. The rationale is that determining the effect of analgesia in this pediatric population is important to optimize clinical care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, patients ages 8 through 17 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be invited to participate. Those having da Vinci cholecystectomy procedures will also be eligible. The da Vinci System is a minimally invasive option utilizing robotic technology. Once randomized, the patient will undergo either ultrasound guided bilateral TAP blocks or LWI at the beginning of the surgical procedure. Prospective data regarding pain scores, use of opioid medication, and nausea and vomiting episodes will be collected for both groups. Due to the nature of the study, it will not be possible to blind the investigators to the randomly selected method of injecting local anesthesia; however the personnel involved in the post-anesthetic and post-operative assessment will be blinded to the intervention, as well as the subjects themselves.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAP blocks

TAP block group will receive three injections performed by an Anesthesiologist trained in the procedure, prior to initiation of the surgical procedure. Bilateral posterior transversalis fascial plane blocks and a right sided subcostal transverse abdominal plane block will be placed under ultrasound guidance. Normal saline will be used to confirm proper muscle layer placement before instillation of the local anesthesia. All patients will receive 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine with maximum of 60 mL (divided equally amongst the injection sites).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAP Blocks

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block utilizing 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine

Local Wound Infiltration

Local wound infiltration (LWI) will be performed by the operative surgeon using 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine with maximum of 60 mL divided amongst the four port sites. 40% of the total dose will be given at the umbilicus, and 20% will be given at each of the other 3 ports. The majority of the anesthetic will be administered at the peritoneal level. Laparoscopic/robotic cholecystectomy will be performed with a port at the umbilicus and three smaller ports in a standard fashion in the subxiphoid and right upper quadrant regions. If conversion to open cholecystectomy occurs, the study data will still be collected, but the patient's data will be excluded from analysis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

local wound infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

local anesthesia provided at the surgical site utilizing 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAP Blocks

ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block utilizing 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

local wound infiltration

local anesthesia provided at the surgical site utilizing 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

nerve block transversus abdominis plane block local wound injections

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 8-17 yrs of age at date of enrollment.
2. Elective laparoscopic or da Vinci cholecystectomy scheduled for any diagnostic reason.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Chronic pain or chronic use of narcotic or other prescription pain medications.
2. Use of pain medication within 24 hours before surgery
3. Prior major abdominal surgery
4. Evidence of acute inflammation
5. Patients with acute cholecystitis
6. Bleeding / coagulation disorder
7. Seizure disorder
8. Renal dysfunction
9. Infection at injection sites for TAP block or trocar placement
10. Contraindication to LWI or TAP block procedure, as determined by surgeon or anesthesiologist performing the procedure (including, but not limited to, previous incision distorting anatomy or inability to visualize anatomical planes)
11. Any known allergy to medications used in this study
12. Patient unable to verbalize pain score or independently assess pain level
13. Unstable patient in need of emergent intervention at surgeon discretion
14. Patients who are known to be pregnant
15. Patients who are currently prisoners
16. Children in custody of the state
17. Subjects will a BMI \>/= 50
18. Investigator discretion for any other reason
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brian Wallace Gray

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brian Wallace Gray

Pediatric surgeon

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gray Brian, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1410511719

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.