Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT ID: NCT02712151
Last Updated: 2024-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators plan to conduct a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study where patients will be designated into either a test group receiving an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks with ropivacaine and peri-portal sterile saline or the control group that will receive ultrasound-guided TAP block with sterile saline and peri-portal infiltration of ropivacaine. The anesthesia team and surgical team will both be blinded as well as the research personal in the postoperative period. Patients age 5-17 and American Society of Anesthesiology status I and II undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be included.
The study hypothesis is that ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks, specifically single shot transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks, are superior to local wound infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for decreasing postoperative pain and pain related behavior and facilitating functional recovery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nerve Blocks vs Local Injections for Post-op Pain Prevention in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children
NCT03022279
Trans-incisional vs Laparoscopic Guided Rectus Sheath Block for Pediatric Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02494336
Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02225418
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
NCT02185716
Comparison of Oblique Subcostal, Posterior or Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04693156
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Stratified randomization of patients will be conducted by the pharmacy to maintain the double-blinded nature of the study. The pharmacy staff will deliver a study syringe labeled "regional" and a study syringe labeled "local". Depending on randomization, the "regional" syringe will be filled with either ropivacaine 0.2% or normal saline to the corresponding volume based on the dosing outlined. Similarly, the local syringe will be filled with the opposite solution. Thus, if the "regional" syringe is filled with ropivacaine, the local syringe will be filled with normal saline, and vice versa.
Both surgical and anesthesia teams will be blind to the intervention received by the patient.
The patients will be divided into two groups: 1. Abdominal Wall Block with Ropivacaine and 2. Surgical infiltration with Ropivacaine.
The abdominal wall block group will receive: bilateral transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks via ultrasound guidance. A total of 1.0ml/kg distributed between the four blocks (0.4+0.4+0.1+0.1) of 0.2% Ropivacaine (max 50ml) will be injected, as a one time single shot injection, into the fours sites. Surgical infiltration of the four port sites will receive 0.4ml/kg of sterile saline.
The surgical infiltration group will receive: surgical infiltration of local anesthetic into the 4 laparoscopic port sites. A total of 0.4 ml/kg (0.1+0.1+0.1+0.1) of 0.5% Ropivacaine, divided between the four port sites (max 20 ml), will be used. A total of 1ml/kg, divided between the TAP (0.4ml/kg on each side) and RS (0.1ml/kg on each side), of sterile saline will be used for the nerve blocks.
Intra-operative Methods: After induction of anesthesia, but before the first incision, each patient will receive an ultrasound-guided block by the regional anesthesiologist as follows:
A. Block Placement:
a. Time out performed for procedure b. Site prepared using aseptic technique c. Localization of the bilateral posterior TAP plane and bilateral rectus sheaths using a portable ultrasound machine i. Aseptic preparation of probe with sterile sheath ii. 38mm linear probe (BK Medical, USA) iii. 15 MegaHertz frequency d. Needle: 22g 80mm echogenic e. Drug administration per protocol and group allocation
B. Periportal Infiltration:
a. Injection of drug and volume per protocol into the planned insertion sites for the 4 ports.
All patients will receive acetaminophen IV 15 mg/kg, dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg, and morphine 0.05 mg/kg after induction of anesthesia but prior to the first incision. At the conclusion of surgery, prior to emergence, each patient will receive ketorolac IV 0.5 mg/kg (max 30 mg). All intraoperative details of care including vitals signs, medication administration, complications, and timing of events are recorded in the electronic anesthesia record.
PACU Methods: Pain will be assessed post-operatively in the PACU (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit) using the FLACC, FACES Pain Rating Scale or Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) as per PACU protocol and as appropriate to patient age. Once the patient is awake and able to respond to questions, a pain score will be obtained and documented by a study investigator until discharge from the recovery room. Morphine 0.05 mg/kg IV will be administered for NRS, FLACC, or FACES score greater than 4. This can be repeated every 10 minutes to a total of 4 doses. Doses, times, and types of all medications administered in the PACU, in addition to the duration of time a patient spends in the PACU, are documented in the electronic medical record (per standard PACU protocol). Post-anesthetic complications are documented by the PACU nurse in the electronic medical record. Trained research personnel will evaluate for the presence or absence of periumbilical analgesia prior to discharge from PACU. The patient will be discharged from the PACU to an in-patient bed when standard PACU discharge criteria are met.
Inpatient Methods: All patients will receive standard postoperative orders to include acetaminophen 15 mg/kg IV q 6 hours, ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg IV q6 hours, morphine 0.05 mg/kg IV q 2 hours as needed, and oxycodone 0.15 mg/kg PO Q 4 hours as needed. Pain will be assessed by the unit nurses using the appropriate scale for age. Morphine 0.5 mg/kg IV or oxycodone 0.15mg/kg will be administered for NRS, FLACC, or FACES score greater than 4.
Pain Scores will be recorded at 3,6,12 and 24 hours postoperatively with the patient at rest and during coughing.
On the morning of POD #1, trained research personnel will administer the appropriate survey of functional recovery. Validated questionnaires to assess postoperative recovery are available for use in pediatric patients \< 12 yrs age (Parents Postoperative Pain Management (PPPM)) and adult patients (Post Discharge Surgical Recovery (PDSR) scale (10-13)). No validated survey exists for patients between the ages of 12 -17 and it was decided to extend the PPPM for use on patients up to and including patients 15 years of age and to use the PDSR on any patient older than 15.
In addition, parents and patients will fill out a bedside diary in the form of a bingo card (addendum 2).
Total intravenous and oral opioid (oral oxycodone or other oral opioid given will be converted to IV morphine equivalents).
Doses, times, and types of all medications administered while in the OR, PACU and inpatient units will be abstracted from the patient's electronic medical record soon after the patient is discharged from the hospital to ensure that study protocols were followed. Fentanyl administration will be analyzed separate from other opioids due to its comparatively divergent half-life and potency. Other data related to hospital stay such as length of procedure (surgery start time to surgery stop time), length of time in the OR, length of time in the recovery room, and length of hospital stay, will be also be collected. Any complication or opioid-related side effect will also be collected. Data will be kept in an excel spreadsheet. The spreadsheet will have anonymous patient identifiers and will be kept in a folder on a password protected hard-drive. Only persons involved in the research study will have access to the folder.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Abdominal Wall Block with Ropivacaine 0.2%
Patients will receive bilateral transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath blocks via ultrasound guidance. A total of 1.0ml/kg distributed between the four blocks (0.4+0.4+0.1+0.1) of 0.2% Ropivacaine (max 50ml) will be injected, as a one time single shot injection, into the fours sites. Surgical infiltration of the four port sites will receive 0.4ml/kg of sterile saline.
Abdominal Wall Block
bilateral TAP and RS blocks.
Surgical infiltration
distributed between the 4 laparoscopic port sites.
Sterile saline
Placebo injection
Ropivacaine 0.2%
Ropivacaine 0.2% 1.0 ml/kg total in divided doses for bilateral TAP and RS blocks.
Ultrasound
For nerve localization
Surgical Infiltration with Ropivacaine 0.5%
Patients will receive surgical infiltration of local anesthetic into the 4 laparoscopic port sites. A total of 0.4 ml/kg (0.1+0.1+0.1+0.1) of 0.5% Ropivacaine, divided between the four port sites (max 20 ml), will be used. A total of 1ml/kg, divided between the TAP (0.4ml/kg on each side) and RS (0.1ml/kg on each side), of sterile saline will be used for the nerve blocks.
Abdominal Wall Block
bilateral TAP and RS blocks.
Surgical infiltration
distributed between the 4 laparoscopic port sites.
Sterile saline
Placebo injection
Ultrasound
For nerve localization
Ropivacaine 0.5%
Ropivacaine 0.5% 0.4 ml/kg total in divided doses distributed between the 4 laparoscopic port sites
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Abdominal Wall Block
bilateral TAP and RS blocks.
Surgical infiltration
distributed between the 4 laparoscopic port sites.
Sterile saline
Placebo injection
Ropivacaine 0.2%
Ropivacaine 0.2% 1.0 ml/kg total in divided doses for bilateral TAP and RS blocks.
Ultrasound
For nerve localization
Ropivacaine 0.5%
Ropivacaine 0.5% 0.4 ml/kg total in divided doses distributed between the 4 laparoscopic port sites
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ASA status 1-2
3. Parent is able to provide informed consent and patient's \> age 7 able to give assent
4. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
5. Surgery will involve and be limited to laparoscopic cholecystectomy
6. Admission status: 24-hour admission to hospital
Exclusion Criteria
2. All emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomies or conversion to an open procedure
3. Patients who will remain intubated or require ICU care postoperatively
4. Significant liver or renal disease
5. Coagulopathy
6. Underlying neurocognitive disorder or developmental delay affecting ability to convey feelings of pain to medical staff
7. Diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome
8. Active infection over nerve block sites
9. History of allergy to local anesthetic agents or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS)
10. Known alcohol or substance abuse within the past 6 months
11. Daily Opioid use
12. ASA class 3 or higher
5 Years
17 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karen Boretsky
Dr. Karen Boretsky
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karen Boretsky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Finley AG, McGrath PJ, Forward PS, McNeill G, Fitzgerald P. Parents' management of children's pain following 'minor' surgery. Pain. 1996 Jan;64(1):83-87. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00091-7.
Joshi GP, Beck DE, Emerson RH, Halaszynski TM, Jahr JS, Lipman AG, Nihira MA, Sheth KR, Simpson MH, Sinatra RS. Defining new directions for more effective management of surgical pain in the United States: highlights of the inaugural Surgical Pain Congress. Am Surg. 2014 Mar;80(3):219-28.
Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.
Joshi GP, Kehlet H. Procedure-specific pain management: the road to improve postsurgical pain management? Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):780-2. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866e1. No abstract available.
Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, Brolmann HA, de Vet HC. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery. 2008 Feb;143(2):206-15. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.017. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
Kleinbeck SV. Self-reported at-home postoperative recovery. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Dec;23(6):461-72. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200012)23:63.0.CO;2-S.
Chambers CT, Reid GJ, McGrath PJ, Finley GA. Development and preliminary validation of a postoperative pain measure for parents. Pain. 1996 Dec;68(2-3):307-13. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03209-5.
von Baeyer CL, Chambers CT, Eakins DM. Development of a 10-item short form of the parents' postoperative pain measure: the PPPM-SF. J Pain. 2011 Mar;12(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-P00022058
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.