Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block

NCT ID: NCT05094193

Last Updated: 2021-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For symptomatic gall bladder disorders (cholelithiasis and cholecystitis), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered as the gold standard treatment. However, these minimally invasive technique is associated with acute moderate pain during the 24 hours postoperative, which is routinely managed using opioids. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been used as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy. Besides, Wang et al found that TAP block is more effective than a conventional pain control, but not significatively different from another local incisional pain control that is port site infiltration.So, the aim of this study, is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of trocar-site infiltration with ropivacaine with ultrasound-guided TAP block following laparoscopic cholecystectomy when used as part of multimodal analgesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Acute pain management Ropivacaine Trocar-site infiltration TAP-block Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trocar-site infiltration

Trocar-site infiltration with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% (6 mL in 10 mm trocar site and 4 mL in 5 mm trocar site) associated with bilateral TAP block with 20 mL of normal saline in each side

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trocar-site infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% (6 mL in 10 mm trocar site and 4 mL in 6 mm trocar site)

TAP block placebo

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of normal saline in each side

TAP block

Trocar-site infiltration with 20 mL of normal saline associated with bilateral TAP block with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% in each side

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% in each side

Trocar site infiltration placebo

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

20 mL of normal saline

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trocar-site infiltration

20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% (6 mL in 10 mm trocar site and 4 mL in 6 mm trocar site)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TAP block

bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% in each side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Trocar site infiltration placebo

20 mL of normal saline

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TAP block placebo

bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of normal saline in each side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* BMI \< 30 kg/m2
* Scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
* ASA grade I, II and III

Exclusion Criteria

* Bile duct exploration, insertion of a T-drain or patients with acute cholecystitis
* Conversion to open cholecystectomy or if the surgery exceeded 200 minutes
* Severe systemic disease
* Patients on analgesics for any reason
* History of allergy to local anesthetics
* An ongoing pregnancy
* Patient refusal
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tunis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daghmouri Mohamed Aziz

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

BEN FADHEL Kamel, M.D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Habib Thameur Hospital of Tunis, Department of Anesthesia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Habib Thameur Hospital

Tunis, , Tunisia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Tunisia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

DAGHMOURI Mohamed Aziz, M.D

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0029442474

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HTHEC-2021-29

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id