Application of a New Surgical Technique in Proximal Gastrectomy: a Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

NCT ID: NCT06679244

Last Updated: 2025-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-04

Study Completion Date

2029-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective study using a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label, and efficacy validated approach.At present, there is no universally recognized optimal method for gastrointestinal reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.Author's team has proposed an innovative method named Hao's Esophagogastrostomay by Fisture Technique (HEFT).By adding anti reflux structures such as "false gastric fundus" and "false cardia" to the anastomosis of the residual stomach of the esophagus, not only can the purpose of anti reflux be achieved, but also the normal physiological channel can be maintained, it can fully utilize residual stomach function and reduce the difficulty of surgery.Through retrospective research, our single center has confirmed that HEFT is safe and feasible.On this basis, this study will compare the nutritional status, short- and medium- to long-term safety after laparoscopic HEFT and double-tract reconstruction , in order to evaluate and discover more reasonable digestive tract reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy, and to promote the development and popularization of minimally treatment technology for gastric cancer.

This study was jointly conducted by Shanghai-level hospitals (Huashan Hospital ,Shanghai Cancer Center, and Ruijin Hospital), with Huashan Hospital as the leading unit. This study will recruit 52 patients, with 26 patients in the experimental group and 26 patients in the control group. Using a central dynamic randomization method based on minimization, patients are assigned to groups in a 1:1 ratio. Based on the different anastomotic methods used in proximal gastrectomy, patients are divided into a HEFT group (experimental group) and a double-tract reconstruction group (control group).Plan to collect cases for 2 years, and follow up for another year after the last case is enrolled.

The primary endpoint of the study was the body weight loss (BWL) rate at 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints: Effect evaluation indicators: hemoglobin level at 1 year after surgery; Serum albumin level at 1 year after surgery; The incidence of anastomotic stenosis 1 year after surgery; Incidence of reflux esophagitis at 1 year after surgery. Evaluation of short-term surgical safety (duration: 7 days): operation time, intraoperative bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pancreatic leakage, and incidence of abdominal infection; Evaluation of medium- and long-term safety after surgery (duration: 36 months): overall survival rate at 3 years after surgery; disease-free survival rate at 3 years after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Based on the different anastomotic methods used in proximal gastrectomy, patients are divided into a HEFT group (experimental group) and a double-tract reconstruction group (control group).

HEFT group:Patients included in this group will receive totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique(HEFT),which is an innovative surgery that investigators first began to apply in patients with proximal gastric cancer.

double-tract reconstruction group:Patients included in this group will receive totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction group,which is a widely used and proven safe and effective surgical approach in proximal gastrectomy
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Performing Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This is an innovative surgical method applied in proximal gastrectomy. By adding anti reflux structures such as "false gastric fundus" and "false cardia" on the basis of esophageal residual gastric anastomosis, the goal of anti reflux is achieved, while maintaining normal physiological channels and fully utilizing residual gastric function, reducing the difficulty of proximal gastrectomy surgery

Performing double-tract reconstruction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This is a traditional surgical method that has been widely used in proximal gastrectomy. After disconnecting the proximal stomach, performing Roux-en-Y anastomosis of the esophagus and jejunum firstly, followed by lateral anastomosis of the residual stomach and jejunum. Previous studies have confirmed its safety and effectiveness, but there are also issues of gastric channel disuse and high missed detection rate of residual stomach.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with Hao's esophagogastrostomy by fissure technique

This is an innovative surgical method applied in proximal gastrectomy. By adding anti reflux structures such as "false gastric fundus" and "false cardia" on the basis of esophageal residual gastric anastomosis, the goal of anti reflux is achieved, while maintaining normal physiological channels and fully utilizing residual gastric function, reducing the difficulty of proximal gastrectomy surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction

This is a traditional surgical method that has been widely used in proximal gastrectomy. After disconnecting the proximal stomach, performing Roux-en-Y anastomosis of the esophagus and jejunum firstly, followed by lateral anastomosis of the residual stomach and jejunum. Previous studies have confirmed its safety and effectiveness, but there are also issues of gastric channel disuse and high missed detection rate of residual stomach.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 18 years old ≤ 80 years old;
2. The primary tumor lesion is located in the upper part of the stomach or the esophagogastric junction (Siewert II or III), and it is expected that R0 surgical results can be obtained by performing proximal gastrectomy and D2 dissection;
3. The primary lesion was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma through endoscopic biopsy and histopathological examination;
4. If it is upper gastric adenocarcinoma, the clinical TNM staging based on imaging needs to be cT1N0M0. If it is ductal gastric junction adenocarcinoma, it needs to be cT1-3N0-1M0, and clinical imaging judgment shows no distant gastric lymph node metastasis;
5. Expected survival exceeds 6 months;
6. No history of upper abdominal surgery (excluding laparoscopic cholecystectomy);
7. No chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc. were performed before surgery;
8. Preoperative ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) physical status score 0/1;
9. Preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grading I-III ;
10. Good function of important organs;
11. Sign the patient's informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

1. Preoperative imaging examination suggests the fusion of enlarged lymph nodes (maximum diameter ≥ 3cm) in the area;
2. Pregnant and lactating women;
3. Suffering from other malignant tumors within 5 years;
4. Preoperative body temperature ≥ 38 ℃ or complicated with infectious diseases requiring systematic treatment;
5. Serious mental illness;
6. Severe respiratory diseases, FEV1\<50% of the expected value;
7. Severe liver and kidney dysfunction;
8. History of unstable angina or heart attack within 6 months;
9. History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months, excluding old intracavitary infarction;
10. Apply systemic corticosteroid therapy within one month;
11. Patients with complications of gastric cancer (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) requiring emergency surgery;
12. The patient has participated or is currently participating in other clinical studies (within 6 months)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai Cancer Hospital, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Huashan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hao Hankun

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

Shanghai, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Second Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,

Shanghai, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hankun Hao, doctor

Role: CONTACT

+86 18121186328

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lu Zang, doctor

Role: primary

+86 13701752969

Hankun Hao, doctor

Role: primary

+86 18121186328

FengLin Liu, doctor

Role: primary

+86 13918765733

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Moriya H, Hirai K, Watanabe M. Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with Toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Sep;209(3):344-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Jun 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19717038 (View on PubMed)

Aizawa M, Yabusaki H, Nakada K, Matsuki A, Bamba T, Nakagawa S. A Retrospective Review of a Single-Center Experience with Posterolateral Fundoplication During Esophagogastrostomy After Proximal Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3230-3233. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05052-8. Epub 2021 Jul 8. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34240326 (View on PubMed)

Shoji Y, Nunobe S, Ida S, Kumagai K, Ohashi M, Sano T, Hiki N. Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019 Sep;22(5):1036-1043. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00940-0. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30838469 (View on PubMed)

Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S, Ueyama S, Tanaka N, Muraoka A, Hato S, Kimura T, Tanakaya K, Kikuchi S, Tanabe S, Noma K, Nishizaki M, Kagawa S, Shirakawa Y, Kamikawa Y, Fujiwara T. Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study). Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018 Oct 11;3(1):96-103. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12216. eCollection 2019 Jan.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30697614 (View on PubMed)

Aihara R, Mochiki E, Ohno T, Yanai M, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, Ando H, Asao T, Kuwano H. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0947-8. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20376493 (View on PubMed)

Tanaka K, Ebihara Y, Kurashima Y, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Noji T, Murakami S, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with oblique jejunogastrostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Sep;402(6):995-1002. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1587-4. Epub 2017 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28493146 (View on PubMed)

Aikou T, Natsugoe S, Shimazu H, Nishi M. Antrum preserving double tract method for reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy. Jpn J Surg. 1988 Jan;18(1):114-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02470857.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3386066 (View on PubMed)

Zang L. [Reconstruction following laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;15(8):787-9. Chinese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23072016 (View on PubMed)

Fujiya K, Kawamura T, Omae K, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Terashima M. Impact of Malnutrition After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Long-Term Survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):974-983. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6342-8. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29388124 (View on PubMed)

Yamasaki M, Takiguchi S, Omori T, Hirao M, Imamura H, Fujitani K, Tamura S, Akamaru Y, Kishi K, Fujita J, Hirao T, Demura K, Matsuyama J, Takeno A, Ebisui C, Takachi K, Takayama O, Fukunaga H, Okada K, Adachi S, Fukuda S, Matsuura N, Saito T, Takahashi T, Kurokawa Y, Yano M, Eguchi H, Doki Y. Multicenter prospective trial of total gastrectomy versus proximal gastrectomy for upper third cT1 gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;24(2):535-543. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01129-6. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33118118 (View on PubMed)

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jan;26(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36342574 (View on PubMed)

GBD 2017 Stomach Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;5(1):42-54. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30328-0. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31648970 (View on PubMed)

Cui WL, Wang ZQ, Shi XL, Ma MY, Wang J, Wang ZH, Wang YP, Hong J, Hao HK. Application of Hao's Esophagogastrostomy by Fissure Technique (HEFT) in proximal gastrectomy: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e104365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104365.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40803728 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-1173

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PG Versus TG for Advanced PGC
NCT06614439 COMPLETED NA