Clinical Studies of Endometrial Cytology and Cervical Methylation Assays in Endometrial Cancer Screening and Fertility-Preservation Evaluation
NCT ID: NCT06672341
Last Updated: 2024-11-05
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Total Enrollment
200 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2024-11-04
Study Completion Date
2026-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The current study aims to assess high-risk patients using both liquid-based cytology and cervical methylation testing. The results will be compared with the traditional hysteroscopic pathological findings to determine the sensitivity and specificity of these methods for early detection of endometrial cancer, thereby evaluating their potential application in early screening.
Primary Objectives：
1. To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of endometrial cytology for screening endometrial cancer.
2. To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of methylation testing for screening endometrial cancer.
3. To perform further molecular testing on tissue samples obtained from endometrial cytology and cervical methylation tests, aiming to explore early screening-sensitive indicators.
Secondary Objectives：
1. To determine the value of endometrial cytology in evaluating the efficacy of fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial cancer.
2. To assess the value of methylation testing in evaluating the efficacy of fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial cancer.
Primary Objectives：
1. To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of endometrial cytology for screening endometrial cancer.
2. To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of methylation testing for screening endometrial cancer.
3. To perform further molecular testing on tissue samples obtained from endometrial cytology and cervical methylation tests, aiming to explore early screening-sensitive indicators.
Secondary Objectives：
1. To determine the value of endometrial cytology in evaluating the efficacy of fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial cancer.
2. To assess the value of methylation testing in evaluating the efficacy of fertility-sparing treatments for endometrial cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cervical Cytology DNA Methylation for Endometrial Lesion Screening and Follow-up
NCT07298707
Endometrial Neoplasms
DNA Methylation
Cervical Smears
+2 more
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Endometrial Cancer Screening in High-risk Populations
NCT06125886
Cancer Screening
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Detection of Tumor DNA Through Cervical Smear and Liquid Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer Patients and Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Values of Tumor DNA Assay
NCT05504161
Endometrial Cancer
UNKNOWN
Methylated Biomarkers Predictive of Endometrial Cancer Risk
NCT06800677
Endometrial Cancer
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
DNA Methylation for Screening Uterine Cervical Lesions
NCT03960879
DNA Methylation
Uterine Cervical Cancer
High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
+1 more
UNKNOWN
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Endometrial cancer (EC) represents a significant public health concern for women globally, with nearly 200,000 new cases diagnosed each year. It ranks as the fourth most common gynecological malignancy threatening women's health, particularly prevalent among women in developed countries . In China, EC holds a prominent position in gynecological oncology, with studies indicating that its incidence rate is surpassed only by breast and cervical cancers . In recent years, the incidence of endometrial cancer has been steadily rising, particularly among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, with a notable trend toward younger age groups .
According to traditional etiological classifications, endometrial cancer can be divided into two types: Type I, which is estrogen-dependent, typically affects younger women, is characterized by lower cellular and tissue atypia, and is generally associated with a better prognosis. In contrast, Type II is independent of estrogen exposure, often exhibits high levels of cellular and tissue atypia, affects older women, and is linked to poorer prognoses.The 2023 FIGO guidelines introduced a molecular classification system for endometrial cancer based on gene expression profiles. This system identifies four molecular subtypes: POLE-mutant, mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53-mutant (p53abn). These classifications have shown improved prognostic accuracy and have been incorporated into the 2023 FIGO staging criteria. As a common gynecological malignancy, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis, which underscores the critical importance of early detection and diagnosis.
1.2 Early Screening Methods for Endometrial Cancer The search for effective early screening methods for endometrial cancer has garnered increasing attention from researchers and clinicians globally, with a growing body of studies addressing this issue. Currently, the primary method for early diagnosis remains pathological examination through endometrial curettage, which is considered the clinical gold standard. However, curettage has several limitations, including procedural complexity, cost, risk of intrauterine bleeding, potential iatrogenic infection, and patient discomfort.In addition to curettage, imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) are widely used for clinical diagnosis. TVU is a non-invasive, safe, and convenient method. However, its diagnostic accuracy is often limited by the apparent thickness of the endometrium, which can be influenced by various factors such as individual uterine anatomy and the patient's menstrual cycle phase. Blood spectrometry can detect endometrial cancer at all stages and may assist in identifying atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Additionally, several potential biomarkers, such as microRNAs, have been discovered. However, blood tests generally have low specificity and sensitivity, making them prone to interference from other pathological factors, which limits their clinical application prospects.
1.3 Endometrial Cytology Examination A review of commonly used screening methods reveals that each has its limitations and cannot be considered an optimal or universally applicable approach. Consequently, there is a pressing need for a more efficient, cost-effective, and low-risk screening method for endometrial cancer.
Liquid-based endometrial cytology is an emerging minimally invasive screening technique. This method involves collecting endometrial cells and tissues from the uterus and its downstream anatomical structures. The samples are preserved and analyzed using either liquid-based cytology techniques or tissue smear methods to reach a pathological diagnosis. Compared to invasive procedures such as fractional curettage, liquid-based cytology offers advantages in the screening of endometrial cancer, including being minimally invasive, convenient, and low-risk. In some clinical guidelines, liquid-based endometrial cytology has been recommended as a preferred screening method for endometrial cancer.
Currently, several instruments are used for endometrial cytology sampling, including the Tao Brush, Li Brush, pipelle catheter, and SAP-1 endometrial sampler. The Tao Brush and Li Brush are primarily used in Western countries, while the SAP-1, a domestically developed device, is more commonly applied in China. Recent studies have demonstrated that the Tao Brush provides a sample adequacy rate ranging from 89.9% to 100%, with a diagnostic concordance rate with histopathological findings of 91% to 96%. For diagnosing atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer, the Tao Brush exhibits sensitivity ranging from 91.7% to 100% and specificity of 96%. Similarly, the Li Brush demonstrates a sensitivity of 92.73% and specificity of 98.15% for screening endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. The pipelle aspiration method, known for its simplicity and reliability, shows a sample adequacy rate of 73.9% to 100%, with a sensitivity of 77.4% to 94.1% and a specificity of 98.5% to 100% for diagnosing endometrial cancer. Moreover, the pipelle aspiration method demonstrates both high sensitivity (99.6%) and specificity (98% to 100%) for detecting endometrial cancer and its precursor lesion, atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The SAP-1 endometrial sampler has also proven effective, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 91.7%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 99.3%, respectively, for diagnosing endometrial cancer. For endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, the SAP-1 device offers sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 82.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 99.4%, respectively. Among these methods, Pipelle suction has been most widely studied in clinical applications, with advantages in specimen quantity and accuracy. However, it is limited by a lack of visual control during sampling, which often restricts the sample range. Brush sampling covers a broader range and is effective for cell collection, but may not adequately capture small tissue samples. The SAP-1 sampler was designed to balance the advantages of both, though larger-scale studies are still needed to further evaluate its effectiveness.
Liquid-based cytology testing for endometrial cancer involves collecting specimens from the endometrium, cervix, vagina, and urine. A cohort study investigating vaginal specimens demonstrated that endometrial cells obtained via vaginal smears, analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting three genes associated with endometrial cancer (CTNNB1 on chromosome 3p22.1, FBXW7 on chromosome 4q31.3, and APC on chromosome 5q22.2), produced significant results in screening for endometrial cells. Among 65 confirmed cases of endometrial cancer, only 2 patients (3%) exhibited no abnormalities in the expression levels of these three genetic loci, resulting in a sensitivity of 97%. In a trial with 70 subjects, setting the optimal threshold by defining a positive result as having \>33.60% of cells in the vaginal smear show apparent pathological features yielded a sensitivity of 0.91, specificity of 0.83, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99) . Additionally, a multicenter study divided subjects into five cohorts based on their disease background and employed three methods for collecting endometrial cells: cervical smears, vaginal swabs, and self-collection. These samples were then analyzed using the Women's Cancer Risk Identification Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (WID-qEC) test. The WID-qEC technique uses polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess CpG island methylation in specific regions of the ZSCAN12 gene and the GYPC gene for the cytological screening of endometrial cancer. At the optimal threshold, the sensitivity for detecting endometrial cancer (EC) in cervical, self-collected, and vaginal swab samples from symptomatic patients was 97.2% (95% CI, 90.2-99.7), 90.1% (83.6-94.6), and 100% (63.1-100), respectively, while the specificity was 75.8% (63.6-85.5), 86.7% (79.3-92.2), and 89.1% (77.8-95.9), respectively. This multicenter study also included a prospective trial where cervical samples were used to predict the occurrence of endometrial cancer over a defined period. WID-qEC successfully identified 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8-98.9) of endometrial cancer cases a year before the subjects were ultimately diagnosed. The results of this multicenter trial showed consistent performance across different demographic groups, including menopausal status, age, cancer stage, grade, and ethnicity.
In another study that utilized cervical smear samples, WID-qEC screening for endometrial cancer achieved sensitivities of 86% and 90% in 64 confirmed endometrial cancer cases and 225 control subjects, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97). In a prospective study of 150 healthy Swedish women, WID-qEC screening confirmed 54 cases of endometrial cancer after three years. The sensitivity and specificity were 52% and 98%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89) . In terms of endometrial sampling, the pipelle catheter is the primary method used internationally. A meta-analysis of 12 studies, published between 1986 and 2022, encompassing 1,607 participants, evaluated the use of the pipelle for endometrial cancer screening. The results indicated that the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of the pipelle test were 0.774 (95% CI: 0.565-0.900), 0.985 (95% CI: 0.927-0.997), 97.000 (95% CI: 14.000-349.000), and 0.241 (95% CI: 0.101-0.442), respectively. These results were comparable to those of diagnostic curettage. For conventional diagnostic curettage, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.880 (95% CI: 0.281-0.993), 0.984 (95% CI: 0.956-0.995), 59.300 (95% CI: 14.200-153.000), and 0.194 (95% CI: 0.007-0.732), respectively . A similar prospective study from China examined endometrial cytology using the SAP-1 endometrial sampler. This study compared the results with those obtained through hysteroscopic examination and found that the sensitivity was 87.5%, and the specificity was 100%. However, the sample size of this study was relatively small, necessitating further validation with larger studies .
1.4 Cervical Cell Methylation Testing Cervical cell methylation testing is another promising method for methylation-based screening of endometrial cancer. This approach targets specific genes that undergo methylation in the early stages of endometrial cancer. The combined methylation analysis of four genes (CD01, BHLHE22, ACTB, and SEPTIN9) uses menstrual blood or vaginal secretions as samples, offering advantages such as safety, non-invasiveness, and self-collection. This method has shown high sensitivity and specificity for the early detection of endometrial cancer. Ongoing research suggests that the sensitivity and specificity of cervical cell methylation testing can reach 93.2% and 96%, respectively, although this data is yet to be published .
According to traditional etiological classifications, endometrial cancer can be divided into two types: Type I, which is estrogen-dependent, typically affects younger women, is characterized by lower cellular and tissue atypia, and is generally associated with a better prognosis. In contrast, Type II is independent of estrogen exposure, often exhibits high levels of cellular and tissue atypia, affects older women, and is linked to poorer prognoses.The 2023 FIGO guidelines introduced a molecular classification system for endometrial cancer based on gene expression profiles. This system identifies four molecular subtypes: POLE-mutant, mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53-mutant (p53abn). These classifications have shown improved prognostic accuracy and have been incorporated into the 2023 FIGO staging criteria. As a common gynecological malignancy, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis, which underscores the critical importance of early detection and diagnosis.
1.2 Early Screening Methods for Endometrial Cancer The search for effective early screening methods for endometrial cancer has garnered increasing attention from researchers and clinicians globally, with a growing body of studies addressing this issue. Currently, the primary method for early diagnosis remains pathological examination through endometrial curettage, which is considered the clinical gold standard. However, curettage has several limitations, including procedural complexity, cost, risk of intrauterine bleeding, potential iatrogenic infection, and patient discomfort.In addition to curettage, imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) are widely used for clinical diagnosis. TVU is a non-invasive, safe, and convenient method. However, its diagnostic accuracy is often limited by the apparent thickness of the endometrium, which can be influenced by various factors such as individual uterine anatomy and the patient's menstrual cycle phase. Blood spectrometry can detect endometrial cancer at all stages and may assist in identifying atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Additionally, several potential biomarkers, such as microRNAs, have been discovered. However, blood tests generally have low specificity and sensitivity, making them prone to interference from other pathological factors, which limits their clinical application prospects.
1.3 Endometrial Cytology Examination A review of commonly used screening methods reveals that each has its limitations and cannot be considered an optimal or universally applicable approach. Consequently, there is a pressing need for a more efficient, cost-effective, and low-risk screening method for endometrial cancer.
Liquid-based endometrial cytology is an emerging minimally invasive screening technique. This method involves collecting endometrial cells and tissues from the uterus and its downstream anatomical structures. The samples are preserved and analyzed using either liquid-based cytology techniques or tissue smear methods to reach a pathological diagnosis. Compared to invasive procedures such as fractional curettage, liquid-based cytology offers advantages in the screening of endometrial cancer, including being minimally invasive, convenient, and low-risk. In some clinical guidelines, liquid-based endometrial cytology has been recommended as a preferred screening method for endometrial cancer.
Currently, several instruments are used for endometrial cytology sampling, including the Tao Brush, Li Brush, pipelle catheter, and SAP-1 endometrial sampler. The Tao Brush and Li Brush are primarily used in Western countries, while the SAP-1, a domestically developed device, is more commonly applied in China. Recent studies have demonstrated that the Tao Brush provides a sample adequacy rate ranging from 89.9% to 100%, with a diagnostic concordance rate with histopathological findings of 91% to 96%. For diagnosing atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer, the Tao Brush exhibits sensitivity ranging from 91.7% to 100% and specificity of 96%. Similarly, the Li Brush demonstrates a sensitivity of 92.73% and specificity of 98.15% for screening endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. The pipelle aspiration method, known for its simplicity and reliability, shows a sample adequacy rate of 73.9% to 100%, with a sensitivity of 77.4% to 94.1% and a specificity of 98.5% to 100% for diagnosing endometrial cancer. Moreover, the pipelle aspiration method demonstrates both high sensitivity (99.6%) and specificity (98% to 100%) for detecting endometrial cancer and its precursor lesion, atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The SAP-1 endometrial sampler has also proven effective, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 91.7%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 99.3%, respectively, for diagnosing endometrial cancer. For endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, the SAP-1 device offers sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 82.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 99.4%, respectively. Among these methods, Pipelle suction has been most widely studied in clinical applications, with advantages in specimen quantity and accuracy. However, it is limited by a lack of visual control during sampling, which often restricts the sample range. Brush sampling covers a broader range and is effective for cell collection, but may not adequately capture small tissue samples. The SAP-1 sampler was designed to balance the advantages of both, though larger-scale studies are still needed to further evaluate its effectiveness.
Liquid-based cytology testing for endometrial cancer involves collecting specimens from the endometrium, cervix, vagina, and urine. A cohort study investigating vaginal specimens demonstrated that endometrial cells obtained via vaginal smears, analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting three genes associated with endometrial cancer (CTNNB1 on chromosome 3p22.1, FBXW7 on chromosome 4q31.3, and APC on chromosome 5q22.2), produced significant results in screening for endometrial cells. Among 65 confirmed cases of endometrial cancer, only 2 patients (3%) exhibited no abnormalities in the expression levels of these three genetic loci, resulting in a sensitivity of 97%. In a trial with 70 subjects, setting the optimal threshold by defining a positive result as having \>33.60% of cells in the vaginal smear show apparent pathological features yielded a sensitivity of 0.91, specificity of 0.83, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99) . Additionally, a multicenter study divided subjects into five cohorts based on their disease background and employed three methods for collecting endometrial cells: cervical smears, vaginal swabs, and self-collection. These samples were then analyzed using the Women's Cancer Risk Identification Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (WID-qEC) test. The WID-qEC technique uses polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess CpG island methylation in specific regions of the ZSCAN12 gene and the GYPC gene for the cytological screening of endometrial cancer. At the optimal threshold, the sensitivity for detecting endometrial cancer (EC) in cervical, self-collected, and vaginal swab samples from symptomatic patients was 97.2% (95% CI, 90.2-99.7), 90.1% (83.6-94.6), and 100% (63.1-100), respectively, while the specificity was 75.8% (63.6-85.5), 86.7% (79.3-92.2), and 89.1% (77.8-95.9), respectively. This multicenter study also included a prospective trial where cervical samples were used to predict the occurrence of endometrial cancer over a defined period. WID-qEC successfully identified 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8-98.9) of endometrial cancer cases a year before the subjects were ultimately diagnosed. The results of this multicenter trial showed consistent performance across different demographic groups, including menopausal status, age, cancer stage, grade, and ethnicity.
In another study that utilized cervical smear samples, WID-qEC screening for endometrial cancer achieved sensitivities of 86% and 90% in 64 confirmed endometrial cancer cases and 225 control subjects, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97). In a prospective study of 150 healthy Swedish women, WID-qEC screening confirmed 54 cases of endometrial cancer after three years. The sensitivity and specificity were 52% and 98%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89) . In terms of endometrial sampling, the pipelle catheter is the primary method used internationally. A meta-analysis of 12 studies, published between 1986 and 2022, encompassing 1,607 participants, evaluated the use of the pipelle for endometrial cancer screening. The results indicated that the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of the pipelle test were 0.774 (95% CI: 0.565-0.900), 0.985 (95% CI: 0.927-0.997), 97.000 (95% CI: 14.000-349.000), and 0.241 (95% CI: 0.101-0.442), respectively. These results were comparable to those of diagnostic curettage. For conventional diagnostic curettage, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.880 (95% CI: 0.281-0.993), 0.984 (95% CI: 0.956-0.995), 59.300 (95% CI: 14.200-153.000), and 0.194 (95% CI: 0.007-0.732), respectively . A similar prospective study from China examined endometrial cytology using the SAP-1 endometrial sampler. This study compared the results with those obtained through hysteroscopic examination and found that the sensitivity was 87.5%, and the specificity was 100%. However, the sample size of this study was relatively small, necessitating further validation with larger studies .
1.4 Cervical Cell Methylation Testing Cervical cell methylation testing is another promising method for methylation-based screening of endometrial cancer. This approach targets specific genes that undergo methylation in the early stages of endometrial cancer. The combined methylation analysis of four genes (CD01, BHLHE22, ACTB, and SEPTIN9) uses menstrual blood or vaginal secretions as samples, offering advantages such as safety, non-invasiveness, and self-collection. This method has shown high sensitivity and specificity for the early detection of endometrial cancer. Ongoing research suggests that the sensitivity and specificity of cervical cell methylation testing can reach 93.2% and 96%, respectively, although this data is yet to be published .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Endometrial Cancer
Methylation
Cytology
Fertility Preservation
Screening Tool
Liquid Biopsy
Non-invasive
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endometrial Cytology Testing
Endometrial Cytology Examination Liquid-based endometrial cytology is an emerging minimally invasive screening technique. This method involves collecting endometrial cells and tissues from the uterus and its downstream anatomical structures. The samples are preserved and analyzed using either liquid-based cytology techniques or tissue smear methods to reach a pathological diagnosis. Compared to invasive procedures such as fractional curettage, liquid-based cytology offers advantages in the screening of endometrial cancer, including being minimally invasive, convenient, and low-risk.
Intervention Type
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Cervical Methylation Testing
Cervical Cell Methylation Testing Cervical cell methylation testing is another promising method for methylation-based screening of endometrial cancer. This approach targets specific genes that undergo methylation in the early stages of endometrial cancer. The combined methylation analysis of four genes (CD01, BHLHE22, ACTB, and SEPTIN9) uses menstrual blood or vaginal secretions as samples, offering advantages such as safety, non-invasiveness, and self-collection. This method has shown high sensitivity and specificity for the early detection of endometrial cancer. Ongoing research suggests that the sensitivity and specificity of cervical cell methylation testing can reach 93.2% and 96%, respectively, although this data is yet to be published.
Intervention Type
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for the study:
1. Color Doppler ultrasound indicating intrauterine masses or abnormal endometrial thickening (for postmenopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy, endometrial thickness \>5mm).
2. Patients undergoing follow-up and efficacy evaluation for fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
3. Patients with endometrial thickening following endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
4. Signed informed consent form.
5. Good compliance.
1. Color Doppler ultrasound indicating intrauterine masses or abnormal endometrial thickening (for postmenopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy, endometrial thickness \>5mm).
2. Patients undergoing follow-up and efficacy evaluation for fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
3. Patients with endometrial thickening following endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
4. Signed informed consent form.
5. Good compliance.
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
1. Diagnosed with cervical cancer.
2. Severe systemic complications preventing hysteroscopy.
3. Pregnant or recent history of miscarriage.
4. Acute genital tract infection or pelvic inflammatory disease.
5. Insertion of an intrauterine device.
6. Sexual activity, vaginal douching, or medication use within 24 hours.
1. Diagnosed with cervical cancer.
2. Severe systemic complications preventing hysteroscopy.
3. Pregnant or recent history of miscarriage.
4. Acute genital tract infection or pelvic inflammatory disease.
5. Insertion of an intrauterine device.
6. Sexual activity, vaginal douching, or medication use within 24 hours.
Eligible Sex
FEMALE
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yulan Ren
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yulan Ren
Chief Physician
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sakna NA, Elgendi M, Salama MH, Zeinhom A, Labib S, Nabhan AF. Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial sampling tests for detecting endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 23;13(6):e072124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072124.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Barrett JE, Jones A, Evans I, Herzog C, Reisel D, Olaitan A, Mould T, MacDonald N, Doufekas K, Newton C, Crosbie EJ, Bjorge L, Colombo N, Dostalek L, Costas L, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Ponce J, Matias-Guiu X, Zikan M, Cibula D, Wang J, Sundstrom K, Dillner J, Widschwendter M. The WID-EC test for the detection and risk prediction of endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer. 2023 May 1;152(9):1977-1988. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34406. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Herzog C, Marin F, Jones A, Evans I, Reisel D, Redl E, Schreiberhuber L, Paytubi S, Pelegrina B, Carmona A, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Frias-Gomez J, Pineda M, Brunet J, Ponce J, Matias-Guiu X, de Sanjose S, Alemany L, Olaitan A, Wong M, Jurkovic D, Crosbie EJ, Rosenthal AN, Bjorge L, Zikan M, Dostalek L, Cibula D, Sundstrom K, Dillner J, Costas L, Widschwendter M. A Simple Cervicovaginal Epigenetic Test for Screening and Rapid Triage of Women With Suspected Endometrial Cancer: Validation in Several Cohort and Case/Control Sets. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 20;40(33):3828-3838. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00266. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weimer J, Huttmann M, Nusilati A, Andreas S, Roseler J, Tribian N, Rogmans C, Stope MB, Dahl E, Mustea A, Stickeler E, Hedemann N, Florkemeier I, Tiemann K, Magadeeva S, Dempfle A, Arnold N, Maass N, Bauerschlag D. Fluorescence in situ hybridization test for detection of endometrial carcinoma cells by non-invasive vaginal swab. J Cell Mol Med. 2023 Feb;27(3):379-391. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17658. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 734: The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Evaluating the Endometrium of Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e124-e129. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002631.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Paraskevaidi M, Morais CLM, Ashton KM, Stringfellow HF, McVey RJ, Ryan NAJ, O'Flynn H, Sivalingam VN, Kitson SJ, MacKintosh ML, Derbyshire AE, Pow C, Raglan O, Lima KMG, Kyrgiou M, Martin-Hirsch PL, Martin FL, Crosbie EJ. Detecting Endometrial Cancer by Blood Spectroscopy: A Diagnostic Cross-Sectional Study. Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 16;12(5):1256. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051256.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fan X, Zou X, Liu C, Cheng W, Zhang S, Geng X, Zhu W. MicroRNA expression profile in serum reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers for endometrial cancer. Biosci Rep. 2021 Jun 25;41(6):BSR20210111. doi: 10.1042/BSR20210111.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pertl B, Lahousen M, Pieber D, Heydarfadai HJ, Giuliani A. [Value of ultrasound in early detection of endometrial carcinoma]. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 1996;36(1):14-20. doi: 10.1159/000272606. German.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tabor A, Watt HC, Wald NJ. Endometrial thickness as a test for endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):663-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01771-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bassetty KC, Begum D, Barmon D, Baruah U, Gupta S, Kumar M, Nath J, Khanikar D, Bhattacharyya M, Roy PS. FIGO 2023 endometrial staging: a leap of faith into the new "prognostic based' rather than "anatomical based" staging-too fast too furious?? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 May 11;150(5):251. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05739-w.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rammohan P, Thummar V, Mehta P. Nab-Paclitaxel-Based Systemic Approach to Achieving Complete Remission for Relapsed Stage III Endometrial Carcinoma: Insights From the Indian Subcontinent. Cureus. 2024 Mar 28;16(3):e57111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57111. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Di Cristofano A, Ellenson LH. Endometrial carcinoma. Annu Rev Pathol. 2007;2:57-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.2.010506.091905.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hu Z, Wu Z, Liu W, Ning Y, Liu J, Ding W, Fan J, Cai S, Li Q, Li W, Yang X, Dou Y, Wang W, Peng W, Lu F, Zhuang X, Qin T, Kang X, Feng C, Xu Z, Lv Q, Wang Q, Wang C, Wang X, Wang Z, Wang J, Jiang J, Wang B, Mills GB, Ma D, Gao Q, Li K, Chen G, Chen X, Sun C. Proteogenomic insights into early-onset endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: predictors for fertility-sparing therapy response. Nat Genet. 2024 Apr;56(4):637-651. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01703-z. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hao C, Lin S, Liu P, Liang W, Li Z, Li Y. Potential serum metabolites and long-chain noncoding RNA biomarkers for endometrial cancer tissue. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023 Feb;49(2):725-743. doi: 10.1111/jog.15494. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Otsuka I. Therapeutic Benefit of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Node-Negative Uterine-Confined Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: Omission of Adjuvant Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 17;14(18):4516. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184516.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Niu S, Molberg K, Castrillon DH, Lucas E, Chen H. Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Precancers. Molecular Characteristics, Candidate Immunohistochemical Markers, and Promising Results of Three-Marker Panel: Current Status and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 15;16(6):1159. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061159.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2410-Exp098
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Endometrial Cancer Testing With Vaginal and Endometrial Cell Samples
NCT01793545
COMPLETED
A Multi-center Prospective Study on the Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes and Quality of Life in Young Woman After Fertility-sparing Treatment of Endometrial Cancer and Endometrial Intraepithelial Hyperplasia
NCT06745427
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies
NCT05309122
UNKNOWN
DNA Methylation Testing for the Screening of Uterine Cervical Lesion
NCT04646954
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
Host DNA Methylation for Endometrial Cancer Screening
NCT05290415
UNKNOWN
The Feasibility Study of the Li Brush for the Screening of Endometrial Cancer in the Postmenopausal Period
NCT02512848
UNKNOWN
DNA Methylation for Screening Uterine Cervical Lesions: A Case-control Study
NCT03961191
UNKNOWN
Cytologic Analysis of Distention Media as a Screening Test for Endometrial Cancer
NCT00462969
COMPLETED
NA
Cell-free DNA Methylation for Endometrial Cancer
NCT04651738
UNKNOWN
NA
Conservative Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer
NCT06170684
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
An Observational Study Based on Endometrial Cancer Risk Screening Model
NCT05634798
UNKNOWN
Study of Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome in Chinese Patients of Endometrial Cancer
NCT03291106
UNKNOWN
Leveraging Methylated DNA Markers (MDMs) in the Detection of Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Cervical Cancer
NCT05051722
RECRUITING
Use of an Intrauterine Manipulator and Its Correlation with Positive Peritoneal Cytology in Early Stage Endometrial Cancers
NCT04570553
RECRUITING
NA
Cervical Cytology DNA Methylation for Cervical Cancer Screening
NCT06557954
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Determine the Utility of Liquid Biopsies and Tumor Molecular Profiling in Predicting Recurrence in Endometrial Cancers
NCT05049538
RECRUITING
Vaginal Fluid Collection for Detection of Endometrial Cancer
NCT06294886
RECRUITING
Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer
NCT05737797
RECRUITING
NA
Cervical Cancer Screening with NGS-HPV Technology Based on Menstrual Blood
NCT06082765
RECRUITING
Probe-based and Needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy During Gynaecological Procedures.
NCT02221076
COMPLETED
NA
Screening of Biomarkers on Endometrial Cancers
NCT00674349
UNKNOWN
NA
Comparison Of Cytology And Molecular Screening For Detecting Cervical Reactive Cellular Changes In General Population
NCT07211204
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
A Cohort Study of Uterine Malignancies
NCT05635123
RECRUITING
DNA Methylation and the Increased Risk of Cervical Cancer Development
NCT06859151
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Survival Outcomes of Uterine Cervical Malignancies in Chinese Population
NCT03291236
UNKNOWN