Comparison of High Flow vs Standard Nasal Cannula in Children With Burns Under Sedoanalgesia

NCT ID: NCT06663293

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-10

Study Completion Date

2022-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to investigate the positive effects of high-flow oxygen therapy on the reduction of airway adverse events and recovery time compared to conventional nasal oxygen therapy in pediatric burns treated with procedural sedoanalgesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNCO) has gained popularity in pediatric anesthesia practice. The basic mechanism of HFNCO involves reducing metabolic cost and work of breathing, decreasing nasopharyngeal resistance, and improving gas conditioning and secretion clearance. Heating and humidifying the oxygen administered make it easier for patients to tolerate high flow. The flow rate can be adjusted for all age groups. However, there are no studies in the literature investigating the effectiveness of HFNCO during procedural sedation in pediatric burn patients.

This randomized prospective study was performed in 50 patients aged 1-14 years in the pediatric burn unit. Patients were divided into two groups as Group HFO: High flow oxygen (n: 25) and Group NC: nasal cannula oxygen (n: 25). Age, sex, burn percentage, concomitant diseases, ASA score, BMI (body mass index), respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, recovery time and presence of complications during sedoanalgesia were recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Burns

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

50 patients aged 1-14 years in the pediatric burn unit were divided into two groups as Group HFO: High flow oxygen (n: 25) and Group NC: nasal cannula oxygen (n: 25).

The high flow group received nasal high flow therapy delivered by AIRVO™ 2 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Systems, New Zealand) along with single-use nasal oxygen cannulas. The HFNCO device was set to a temperature of 36°C and an FiO2 of 0.4. The initial oxygen flow rate for the high flow group was determined according to the age and weight of the patients, based on our pediatric intensive care team's guidelines and the reference from the Slain NK (10) study. When SpO2 fell below 94%, it was considered hypoxia, and the flow rate was increased by 2 to 4 L/min.

For the low flow group, the initial flow rate for nasal cannula oxygen was set at 3 L/min. In cases of hypoxia, the oxygen concentration was adjusted by increasing the flow rate by 1 to 2 L/min.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Nasal Cannula Oxygen group

Participants received low flow oxygen therapy through a conventional nasal cannula. The initial flow rate for nasal cannula oxygen was set at 3 L/min. In cases of hypoxia, the oxygen concentration was adjusted by increasing the flow rate by 1 to 2 L/min.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Conventional Nasal Cannula

Intervention Type OTHER

The initial flow rate for nasal cannula oxygen was set at 3 L/min. In cases of hypoxia, the oxygen concentration was adjusted by increasing the flow rate by 1 to 2 L/min.

midazolam, ketamine, propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Sedation was done with IV midazolam 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg, IV ketamine 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg, and IV propofol (1%) 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Sedation maintenance was done by propofol 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/h

High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Group

Participants received nasal high flow therapy delivered by AIRVO™ 2 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Systems, New Zealand) along with single-use nasal oxygen cannulas.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

High-flow nasal cannula

Intervention Type OTHER

The high-flow nasal oxygenation device was set to a temperature of 36°C and an FiO2 of 0.4. The initial oxygen flow rate for the high flow group was determined according to the age and weight of the patients, based on our pediatric intensive care team's guidelines and the reference from the Slain study. When SpO2 fell below 94%, it was considered hypoxia, and the flow rate was increased by 2 to 4 L/min.

midazolam, ketamine, propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Sedation was done with IV midazolam 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg, IV ketamine 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg, and IV propofol (1%) 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Sedation maintenance was done by propofol 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/h

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional Nasal Cannula

The initial flow rate for nasal cannula oxygen was set at 3 L/min. In cases of hypoxia, the oxygen concentration was adjusted by increasing the flow rate by 1 to 2 L/min.

Intervention Type OTHER

High-flow nasal cannula

The high-flow nasal oxygenation device was set to a temperature of 36°C and an FiO2 of 0.4. The initial oxygen flow rate for the high flow group was determined according to the age and weight of the patients, based on our pediatric intensive care team's guidelines and the reference from the Slain study. When SpO2 fell below 94%, it was considered hypoxia, and the flow rate was increased by 2 to 4 L/min.

Intervention Type OTHER

midazolam, ketamine, propofol

Sedation was done with IV midazolam 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg, IV ketamine 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg, and IV propofol (1%) 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Sedation maintenance was done by propofol 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/h

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 1 and 14 years
* ASA risk groups 1-3
* Second-degree burns covering more than 10% of the total body surface area, or third- and fourth-degree burns covering more than 2% of the total body surface area, burns involving the face, hands, feet, genital area, perineum, or major joints, electrical burns, and chemical burns.

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 1 year of age or over 14 years of age
* ASA score above 3
* Having restrictive or obstructive chronic respiratory diseases, active upper or lower respiratory infections, first-degree burns, and burns to the nasal area or respiratory tract.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zeliha Alicikus

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zeliha Alicikus

Study Director

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Umraniye Education and Research hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B.10.1.TKH.4.34.H.GP.0.01-93

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PreOxygenation In RSI Anesthesia
NCT02794532 COMPLETED NA
TCI vs. Manuel TIVA in Septorhinoplasty Surgeries
NCT06957470 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING