Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2/PHASE3
166 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-30
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Prolonging Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Spinal Anesthesia Through Different Routes if Administrations
NCT06769737
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation in Hypertensive Patients
NCT06712186
Comparision of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine With Low Dose Bupivacaine in Selective Spinal Anesthesia.
NCT04037774
Comparison of Efficacy of Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Block With or Without Dexmedetomidine
NCT05991375
Comparative Analysis of Intraoperative Effect Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Heavy Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries to Evaluate the Hemodynamic Stability and Onset and Duration of Motor Block of Using Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl
NCT07078201
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Numerous research studies have examined the synergistic effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in subarachnoid blocks. These effects are primarily observed in terms of extending the duration of sensory and motor blockade, enhancing postoperative analgesia, decreasing intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, and improving patient satisfaction. The mechanism underlying this synergistic effect is believed to be connected to the effects of dexmedetomidine on the central nervous system, which include its capacity to modify pain pathways, improve spinal anesthesia, and produce drowsiness and anxiolysis.
Although the combination of dexmedetomidine with hyperbaric bupivacaine has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in a number of studies, there is still discussion and continuing research over the best time, dosage, and patient selection criteria. As with any anesthesia procedure, the best course of action should be determined after taking into account specific patient considerations such age, comorbidities, and concurrent drugs.
Hameed et al compare the Synergistic effect of Dexmedetomidine on Subarachnoid Block with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine among three groups. In there study Patients in Group 1 received 2 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine; Group 2 received a combination of bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine infusion; and Group 3 received bupivacaine followed by Dexmedetomidine infusion. Their study show that onset time of sensory blockade. The duration of sensory blockade and the rate of recovery of complete sensory block was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1. The distribution of adverse effect among group 1 and group 2 was, hypotension 20% vs 40%, Bradycadria 8% vs 24%, and Nausea 12% vs 12% respectively.
Previous studies have indicated that Dexmedetomidine can enhance the duration and quality of sensory blockade, improve postoperative analgesia, and reduce opioid consumption when used in conjunction with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Despite these promising findings, further exploration is warranted to elucidate the optimal dosage, timing, and patient selection criteria for Dexmedetomidine administration in subarachnoid blocks. Understanding the mechanistic basis of Dexmedetomidine's synergistic effects on subarachnoid block duration is crucial for refining anesthesia protocols and ultimately improving patient outcomes. By conducting this research study, the investigators aim to contribute valuable insights into the role of Dexmedetomidine as a synergistic agent in prolonging subarachnoid block duration, with the overarching goal of enhancing perioperative care and surgical success rates.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A Hyperbaric Bupivicaine
Group A (Unexposed) will received 2 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine.
Hyperbaric bupivacaine
Group A (Unexposed) will received 2 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine
GROUP B Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine
Group B (Exposed) will receive a combination of bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine infusion.
hyperbaric bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine
Group B (Exposed) will receive a combination of bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine infusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hyperbaric bupivacaine
Group A (Unexposed) will received 2 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine
hyperbaric bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine
Group B (Exposed) will receive a combination of bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine infusion
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients scheduled for surgical procedures of lower limb requiring subarachnoid anesthesia.
3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I or II.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with a history of significant cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, or renal disease.
3. Pregnant or lactating women.
4. Patients with a history of substance abuse or dependence.
5. Patients on chronic opioid therapy or with opioid tolerance.
6. Patients with neurological deficits affecting sensation or motor function in the lower extremities.
7. Patients with psychiatric disorders affecting their ability to cooperate during the procedure or follow instructions.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Faryal Uzma
Faryal Uzma Prinicipal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lady Reading Hospital Mti Peshawar Kp Pakistan
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sharma A, Varghese N, Venkateswaran R. Effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus intravenous dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul-Sep;36(3):381-385. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_323_17. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
359/LRH/MTI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.