Comparison of Quadro Iliac vs Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use in Lumbar Discectomies

NCT ID: NCT06656507

Last Updated: 2025-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This multicenter, randomized, controlled study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in lumbar vertebra surgeries. The study will evaluate postoperative pain management, opioid consumption, side effects, hospital stay duration, and patient satisfaction. Patients scheduled for single-level lumbar disk herniation surgery will be randomized to receive either the QIPB or ESP block before awakening from anesthesia. Pain scores will be measured at multiple postoperative time points, and opioid consumption will be monitored using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The study seeks to identify the most effective and safe method for postoperative pain management in lumbar surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Detailed Description: The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of two commonly used regional anesthesia techniques-Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block-in lumbar vertebra surgeries. This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, and multicenter trial. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QIPB and ESP blocks in postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, side effects, hospital stay duration, and patient satisfaction. The findings are expected to contribute to identifying more effective and safer methods for postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgeries.

This study will focus on examining the impact of these two different block techniques on pain scores, particularly during the early postoperative period. By analyzing the potential benefits and limitations of these techniques, the study will aim to provide valuable insights into postoperative pain control. Additionally, a comparative analysis of the feasibility and patient safety of both block techniques will be conducted.

Materials and Methods: Patients aged 18 and above, with ASA scores of I-III, without bleeding diathesis, no history of anticoagulant use, no history of allergies to the medications used, and no history of neuropathic disease, undergoing single-level lumbar disk herniation surgery will be included in the study. Patients will be randomized to receive either ESP or QIP block before awakening post-surgery. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, and both blocks will be thoroughly explained.

To avoid bias, the study is designed as multicenter, and experienced anesthesiologists will perform the blocks at the end of the surgery, before the patient is awakened.

Block Techniques:

ESP Block: With a linear ultrasound probe in the transverse plane, the transverse process of the L3 vertebra will be identified. A block needle will be advanced under ultrasound guidance, and once the needle touches the transverse process, it will be withdrawn by 1mm, confirmed with sterile saline, and 50 mg (0.25%) bupivacaine will be administered bilaterally.

QIP Block: For patients in a prone position, a low-frequency convex transducer (2-6 MHz) will be placed at the midline at the L3 level in the transverse plane to identify the spinal process. Lateral movement will identify the transverse process within the erector spinae muscle. The transducer will then be rotated to the parasagittal plane and moved caudally to locate the attachment of the Quadratus Lumborum Muscle (QLM) to the iliac crest. A block needle will be advanced under ultrasound guidance, and 50 mg (0.25%) bupivacaine will be injected bilaterally into the fascia below the QLM.

Postoperative Care: Before awakening, all patients will receive 1g of paracetamol, 100mg of tramadol, and 50mg of dexketoprofen intravenously. Postoperatively, multimodal analgesia will be provided using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with tramadol HCl, set to deliver 20 mg boluses with a lockout interval of 20 minutes, and a maximum dose limit of 200mg over 4 hours. Pain scores will be assessed at rest and with movement at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0-10. Opioid consumption and the need for rescue analgesia (50 mg dexketoprofen in 100cc saline over 20 minutes) will also be evaluated. Routine administration of 1g of intravenous paracetamol will be given at 6 hours postoperatively.

Sample Size and Statistical Methods: A power analysis with an alpha error of 0.05, power of 0.8, and effect size of 0.8 determined that at least 26 patients per group (total 52) are needed. Accounting for potential errors, 60 patients will be enrolled in the study. Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS 21. Descriptive statistics will be computed for each variable, with continuous data presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (IQR), and categorical data as frequencies and percentages. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to assess normality, and non-parametric tests will be applied if the data are not normally distributed.

Between-group comparisons of continuous data will use independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on normality. Categorical variables will be compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's Exact Test. Primary outcomes, including NRS pain scores at rest at 24 hours, will be analyzed using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. Secondary outcomes, such as opioid consumption, nausea, vomiting, and motor block, will be analyzed similarly. Rescue analgesia need will be analyzed with the Chi-square test. A p-value of \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

This study aims to provide crucial information on the efficacy and safety of both block techniques, potentially improving postoperative pain management practices in lumbar spine surgeries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Lumbar Disc Herniation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study follows a Parallel Assignment model where eligible patients undergoing lumbar vertebra surgeries will be randomized into one of two groups. One group will receive the Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB), while the other group will receive the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block. Both interventions will be administered pre-awakening following surgery, with each group receiving only their assigned block. The groups will be assessed independently for postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, side effects, and overall patient satisfaction. This parallel approach ensures that each group's treatment and outcomes are evaluated without crossover, allowing for a direct comparison of the two regional anesthesia techniques.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
This study employs a Double-Blind masking approach to minimize bias. Both the patients and the healthcare providers (including postoperative care staff) will be unaware of which block (Quadro Iliac Plane Block or Erector Spinae Plane Block) was administered. The anesthesiologists performing the blocks will be informed of the assigned intervention but will not participate in postoperative care or outcome assessment. The outcome assessors, who will evaluate pain scores, opioid consumption, and other outcomes, will also be blinded to the group allocation to ensure unbiased data collection.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) Arm

Patients in this arm will receive the Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) before awakening from lumbar vertebra surgery. Patients in this arm will receive the Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) before awakening from lumbar vertebra surgery. The patient will be placed in a prone position, and a low-frequency convex ultrasound transducer (2-6 MHz) will be used. The transducer will be placed in the midline at the L3 level in the transverse plane to identify the spinal process. After lateral movement, the transverse process within the erector spinae muscle will be visualized. The transducer will then be rotated to the parasagittal plane and moved caudally to identify the attachment of the Quadratus Lumborum Muscle (QLM) to the iliac crest. A 22G x 100 mm peripheral nerve block needle (Stimuplex® Ultra 360®, B-Braun, USA) will be advanced under ultrasound guidance, and 50 mg (0.25%) bupivacaine will be injected bilaterally into the fascia below the QLM.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) will be performed pre-awakening in patients undergoing lumbar vertebra surgeries. Using a low-frequency convex ultrasound transducer (2-6 MHz), the spinal process will be identified at the L3 level in a prone-positioned patient. The transducer will be moved laterally to locate the transverse process within the erector spinae muscle and then rotated to the parasagittal plane to identify the Quadratus Lumborum Muscle (QLM) attachment to the iliac crest. A 22G x 100 mm block needle will be advanced under ultrasound guidance, and 50 mg (0.25%) bupivacaine will be injected bilaterally into the fascia beneath the QLM. This technique is designed to provide effective postoperative pain control by blocking the nerves in the quadratus lumborum plane.

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) Arm

Patients in this arm will receive the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) before awakening from lumbar vertebra surgery. Patients in this arm will receive the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) before awakening from lumbar vertebra surgery. A linear ultrasound probe will be placed transversely over the L3 vertebra to visualize the transverse process. A block needle (Stimuplex® Ultra 360®, B-Braun, USA) will be advanced under ultrasound guidance until it contacts the transverse process. After withdrawing the needle by 1 mm, 50 mg (0.25%) bupivacaine will be injected bilaterally.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) will also be performed pre-awakening. A linear ultrasound probe will be placed transversely at the level of the L3 vertebra to visualize the transverse process. A block needle will be advanced under ultrasound guidance until it touches the transverse process, after which the needle will be withdrawn 1 mm. Fifty milligrams (0.25%) bupivacaine will then be administered bilaterally. The ESP block aims to provide postoperative analgesia by blocking sensory nerves in the erector spinae plane.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB)

The Quadro Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) will be performed pre-awakening in patients undergoing lumbar vertebra surgeries. Using a low-frequency convex ultrasound transducer (2-6 MHz), the spinal process will be identified at the L3 level in a prone-positioned patient. The transducer will be moved laterally to locate the transverse process within the erector spinae muscle and then rotated to the parasagittal plane to identify the Quadratus Lumborum Muscle (QLM) attachment to the iliac crest. A 22G x 100 mm block needle will be advanced under ultrasound guidance, and 50 mg (0.25%) bupivacaine will be injected bilaterally into the fascia beneath the QLM. This technique is designed to provide effective postoperative pain control by blocking the nerves in the quadratus lumborum plane.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP)

The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) will also be performed pre-awakening. A linear ultrasound probe will be placed transversely at the level of the L3 vertebra to visualize the transverse process. A block needle will be advanced under ultrasound guidance until it touches the transverse process, after which the needle will be withdrawn 1 mm. Fifty milligrams (0.25%) bupivacaine will then be administered bilaterally. The ESP block aims to provide postoperative analgesia by blocking sensory nerves in the erector spinae plane.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 to 65 years.
* ASA physical status classification I-III.
* Patients scheduled for single-level lumbar disk herniation surgery.
* No history of bleeding diathesis.
* No history of anticoagulant use.
* No known allergies to the medications used in the study (e.g., bupivacaine).
* No history of neuropathic diseases.
* Patients who have provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients younger than 18 or older than 65 years.
* ASA physical status classification IV or higher.
* Patients with a history of coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
* Patients with a history of chronic opioid use or substance abuse.
* Patients with allergies to local anesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine).
* Patients with significant neuropathic conditions or central nervous system disorders.
* Patients with any contraindication to regional anesthesia.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
* Patients unable to provide informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Engin Ihsan Turan

anesthesiology and reanimation specialist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Health Science University İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Training Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Zincirlikuyu Medicana Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

qip-esp/ldh

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.