Multimodal Differences in Effort-based Decision-Making in Depression
NCT ID: NCT06648460
Last Updated: 2025-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-08-01
2030-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prediction of REsponse to Depression Interventions Using Clinical and TD-fNIRS Measurements
NCT06002100
Sensor-based Characterization of Depression
NCT04370002
Study of the Neural Circuits Underlying the Negative Emotional Bias of Depressive Disorders and Their Response to Ketamine
NCT06630065
Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability
NCT02931487
Dopamine Neurotransmission in Major Depression
NCT01659814
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current evaluation approaches to characterizing reduced motivation rely on clinical assessments of patient symptoms through interviews and observation. While these typically assess functions relevant to patient quality of life, these assessments may be confounded by biases. On the other hand, translational research focuses on characterizing symptoms using computer-based tasks that provide quantitative objective markers (e.g., reaction time in pressing a key on a keyboard) but may not reflect real-life situations. In addition, studies investigating brain mechanisms often use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which requires patients to be stationary. Thus, there is a fundamental disconnect between measurements of behavior and the behavior itself under study.
To overcome these limitations, the study team envisions developing an instrumented behavioral assay, HORMES, that allows the objective assessment of reduced motivation during naturalistic behavior with concurrent measurements of the central and autonomic nervous systems as well as metabolic energy expenditure. This assay will utilize a CAREN system at Human Augmentation Core, a core facility available at Georgia Tech that is currently used for biomechanics research.
The proposed study will investigate differences in brain activity, autonomic system function, and metabolic energy expenditure in patients with major depression and matched controls during an effort-based decision-making task. The study team will collect multiple physiological measures - brain activity, cardiac activity, breathing activity, and energy expenditure in patients with major depression when they walk on a treadmill. Biomechanical information will be obtained using motion capture. The amount of effort they will need to expend will be varied by adjusting the treadmill's incline. These measures will be compared against those from a control group with age, gender, and BMI-matched healthy individuals.
The outcome of this study will inform what differences exist between healthy individuals and individuals with depression. The participants will be recruited from the Atlanta metro area and will all be allocated to the intervention. which is a behavioral task. The task requires participants to maximize rewards by choosing to pursue actions of different levels of physical effort (walking).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Effort-based decision-making
Participants perform a virtual-reality-based task in which they expend effort to receive virtual rewards.
Effort-based Decision-Making Task
Virtual Reality-based multi-stage task in which individuals must explore distinct "rooms" in a virtual environment that vary in the amount of effort (walking) and reward (points) they receive.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Effort-based Decision-Making Task
Virtual Reality-based multi-stage task in which individuals must explore distinct "rooms" in a virtual environment that vary in the amount of effort (walking) and reward (points) they receive.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18-65 years old
* Able-bodied
* Fluent in English
* Able to give written and verbal informed consent to the proposed experiment
* Able to comprehend the study procedure, potential risks, and benefits
* Group with depression
* Diagnosed with major depression
* Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology (QIDS) score \> 5
* 18-65 years old
* Able-bodied
* Fluent in English
* Able to give written and verbal informed consent to the proposed experiment
* Able to comprehend the study procedure, potential risks, and benefits
Exclusion Criteria
* Current diagnosed psychiatric disorder (e.g., anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder)
* Current pregnancy
* BMI \> 35
* Currently on antipsychotics
* Group with depression
* Diagnosed with psychotic symptoms
* Diagnosed with other neurological or psychiatric disorders
* Current pregnancy
* BMI \> 35
* Currently on antipsychotics
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Emory University
OTHER
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Georgia Institute of Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christopher J Rozell, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Georgia Institute of Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Georgia Tech Manufacturing Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H24306
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.