Restoring Emotion Regulation Networks in Depression Vulnerability

NCT ID: NCT02931487

Last Updated: 2019-04-30

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 134 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2015-05-31
• Study Completion Date: 2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Selective biases in attention can be modified by a simple computerized technique: The Attention Bias Modification Task (ABM) pioneered by MacLeod et al. Cognitive biases may be one reason depression recurs, and altering these biases should reduce risk of recurrence. Recently, evidence has supported this hypothesis . The mechanisms by which ABM works are not well understood. More research is needed to explore how altering an implicit attentional bias can lead to changes in subjective mood. One possible explanation is that positive attentional biases are an important component of explicit methods of emotion regulation. The ability to effectively regulate one's emotions is a fundamental component of mental health and this ability is impaired in depression. It has also been shown that recovered depressed people spontaneously show a more dysfunctional pattern of emotion regulation as compared to never depressed controls. Supporting this, growing evidence implicates dysregulation of a medial/orbitofrontal circuit in mood disorders. This circuit includes the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, the ventral striatum, the ventral pallidum and medial thalamus. Components of this circuit are reciprocally connected with the amygdala, which is implicated in emotional processing in the healthy brain and dysregulated in depression. Negative emotion processing biases depend on both enhanced "bottom-up" responses to emotionally salient stimuli and reduces "top-down" cognitive control mechanisms, required to suppress responses to emotionally salient but task irrelevant information. Cognitive reappraisal and distancing are common strategies to down- or upregulate emotional responses. Reappraisal is an emotion regulation strategy that involves reinterpretation and changing the way one thinks about an event or stimulus with the goal of changing its affective impact. Distancing is a type of reappraisal that involves creating mental space between oneself and the emotional event in order to see things from a different, less self-focused perspective. It has been shown that distancing is a strategy that people can improve at over time compared to reinterpretation. The neural systems which support the explicit regulation of emotion have previously been characterized and include both lateral- and prefrontal cortex. This frontal activity is predicted to downregulate limbic circuitry involving the amygdala during passive viewing of emotional salient stimuli.

Conditions

Major Depression

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: TRIPLE

Study Groups

Attentional Bias Modification

ABM dot-probe task with image stimuli (faces) of three valences: positive (happy), neutral, or negative (angry and fearful). In the ABM condition, probes were located behind positive stimuli in 87 % of the trials (valid trials), as opposed to 13% with probes located behind the more negative stimuli (invalid trials). Consequently, participants should implicitly learn to deploy their attention toward positive stimuli, and in this way develop a more positive AB when completing the task.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Attentional Bias Modification

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Computerized

Sham comparator

Sham condition without modification of attentional bias. These trials are identical in structure to the ABM trials with the exception that target probes replaced negative and positive images with equal frequency.

Group Type: SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Comparator

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Computerized

Interventions

Attentional Bias Modification

Computerized

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Sham Comparator

Computerized

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Currently no-depressed subjects with a history of major depression.

Exclusion Criteria

• Current or past neurological illness, bipolar disorder, psychosis or drug addiction.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Oslo

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Nils Inge Landrø

Professor Dr. philos

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Nils I Landrø, phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Oslo

Locations

University of Oslo, Department of Psychology

Oslo, , Norway

Countries

Norway

References

Hilland E, Landro NI ;, Harmer CJ, Browning M, Maglanoc LA, Jonassen R. Attentional bias modification is associated with fMRI response toward negative stimuli in individuals with residual depression: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020 Jan 1;45(1):23-33. doi: 10.1503/jpn.180118.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 31397551 (View on PubMed)

Hilland E, Landro NI, Harmer CJ, Maglanoc LA, Jonassen R. Within-Network Connectivity in the Salience Network After Attention Bias Modification Training in Residual Depression: Report From a Preregistered Clinical Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 21;12:508. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00508. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 30622463 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

HSØ-2015052

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id