Effects of Pharmacist-led Medication Reconciliation Services on Geriatric Patients

NCT ID: NCT06610292

Last Updated: 2024-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-24

Study Completion Date

2018-10-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess the effects of Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on hospitalized elderly patients aged above 65 at a leading tertiary military hospital in Jordan.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A four-month randomized controlled trial was conducted at King Hussein Medical Hospital (KHMH), one of the Royal Military Medical Services (RMS) tertiary hospitals located in central Amman. During the study period, 128 patients were selected using convenience sampling. Later, medication histories were compared between pre-admission and admission records to obtain the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and identify medication discrepancies, which were categorized as either intentional (documentation errors) or unintentional discrepancies.

The already selected patients were randomly allocated into two groups (intervention and control groups). Then, Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation services were provided to the intervention group and standard care was provided to the control group. Also at discharge the number of medication discrepancies was documented. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with the occurrence of unintentional discrepancies.

Within 30 days post-discharge, patients were assessed for any hospital re-admissions, emergency department visits and medication-related side effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Geriatric Patients Medication Reconcilitation Upon Hospital Admission Medication Reconciliation At Discharge Pharmacist-led Medication Reconciliation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Patients did not receive Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation services

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention group

Patients received Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation services

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation services

Intervention Type OTHER

Upon admission, information about patients Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) was extracted. Information on current medications, both regular and as-needed, was also recorded. All data were cross-referenced with the electronic records and verified through patients or caregivers interviews to create a comprehensive medication list.

Then, comparison was conducted between standard care medication list and Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation list to identify any possible medication discrepancies. Also, during hospital stay and upon discharge emerging medication discrepancies were assessed and resolved.

Moreover, the impacts on healthcare resources utilization within 30 days post-discharge was measured. This includes evaluating hospital re-admissions, emergency department visits, and the occurrence of any adverse drug events (ADEs).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation services

Upon admission, information about patients Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) was extracted. Information on current medications, both regular and as-needed, was also recorded. All data were cross-referenced with the electronic records and verified through patients or caregivers interviews to create a comprehensive medication list.

Then, comparison was conducted between standard care medication list and Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation list to identify any possible medication discrepancies. Also, during hospital stay and upon discharge emerging medication discrepancies were assessed and resolved.

Moreover, the impacts on healthcare resources utilization within 30 days post-discharge was measured. This includes evaluating hospital re-admissions, emergency department visits, and the occurrence of any adverse drug events (ADEs).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Newly admitted patient within no more than 24 hours and anticipated to stay in the hospital for more than 48 hours.
* Geriatrics patients defined as those aged (≥65 years) (Orimo et al., 2006).
* Prescribed at least one chronic medication prior to the study admission.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient admitted to the critical care or isolation units or in unconscious or comatose states.
* Patients if they were discharged against medical advice.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jordanian Royal Medical Services

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Medical Services, Jordanian Armed Forces

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Jordan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Majed Shafaamri

Research Assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eman A Hammad

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Jordan

Amman, , Jordan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Jordan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6/2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.