Effectiveness of an Intervention of Pharmacotherapeutic Plans to Reduce Medication-related Problems in Geriatric Residences

NCT ID: NCT05944328

Last Updated: 2023-07-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

862 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-22

Study Completion Date

2024-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Patients living in Geriatric Residences (RG) have increased aging, comorbidity, spending on health resources and mortality. High drug use is associated with an increased risk of falls, disability, and death. It is estimated that 20-50% of inappropriate medications are consumed in the elderly.

Hypothesis: A pharmaceutical intervention based on a clinical review of the pharmacotherapeutic plan of patients in RG will be useful in optimizing the prescription in terms of safety, reducing by 10% or more the inappropriate prescriptions.

Objectives: Evaluate the effectiveness of a structured pharmaceutical intervention based on the clinical review of the pharmacotherapeutic plan to improve its adequacy.

Decrease inadequate prescriptions in patients admitted to RG by 10%

Methodology: Pre-post, quasi-experimental intervention study with control group with prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients in RG. The intervention consists of the clinical review of the pharmacotherapeutic plan carried out by the pharmacist and subsequently agreed in the Pharmacotherapeutic Advisory Committee.

Determinations: The study variables will be evaluated at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. The primary variable is number of inappropriate prescriptions.

Statistical analysis: Percentage change will be measured before and after the intervention. Descriptive statistics will be performed for quantitative variables such as qualitative and comparison of means and proportions.

Expected results: Achieve a 10% decrease in inappropriate prescriptions

Applicability and Relevance: This study will expand the collaboration between the Pharmacy and Primary Care physicians, promoting the continuum of care, strengthening the safety culture, and improving prescribing habits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polypharmacy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intervention group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

systematic and structured review of patient pharmacotherapeutic treatment plans

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention consisted of a systematic and structured review of patient pharmacotherapeutic treatment plans to identify problems or situations of risk related to pharmacological treatments and to propose changes or improvements to optimise them. phases:

Individualised review of pharmacological treatment plans to detect drug-related problems:

Indication, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Safety When a drug-related problem was detected according to the above criteria, the pharmacist proposed an adjustment to the pharmacotherapeutic plan. The proposals could include: discontinuation of the drug, change of drug, change to a therapeutic equivalent, initiation of treatment, change of dosage, change of frequency or intensified monitoring.

The proposals made by the pharmacist were assessed and agreed upon by a committee comprising the doctors responsible and the pharmacist. Thereafter, the consensual proposals for change were discussed with the patient.

control group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

systematic and structured review of patient pharmacotherapeutic treatment plans

The intervention consisted of a systematic and structured review of patient pharmacotherapeutic treatment plans to identify problems or situations of risk related to pharmacological treatments and to propose changes or improvements to optimise them. phases:

Individualised review of pharmacological treatment plans to detect drug-related problems:

Indication, Appropriateness, Effectiveness, Safety When a drug-related problem was detected according to the above criteria, the pharmacist proposed an adjustment to the pharmacotherapeutic plan. The proposals could include: discontinuation of the drug, change of drug, change to a therapeutic equivalent, initiation of treatment, change of dosage, change of frequency or intensified monitoring.

The proposals made by the pharmacist were assessed and agreed upon by a committee comprising the doctors responsible and the pharmacist. Thereafter, the consensual proposals for change were discussed with the patient.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 65 years or older
* Pharmacological treatment with at least one drug and for a period of more than three months

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals who at the time of the pharmaceutical review were in hospital
* Patients nearing the end of life
* Patients whose participation was considered by the doctor responsible to be potentially detrimental
* Patients not covered by the public healthcare or pharmacy system were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cecilia Campabadal Prats

Tarragona, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

CecĂ­lia Campabadal Prats

Role: primary

679716123

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Campabadal-Prats C, Aragones E, Romeu M, Salom-Garrigues C, Bejarano F, Martin Lujan F, Canadell L. Effectiveness of a structured pharmaceutical review of pharmacotherapeutic plans to reduce drug-related problems in nursing homes: a study protocol of a pragmatic quasi-experimental trial. Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1522650. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1522650. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40717969 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22/191-P

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Polypharmacy Outpatient Clinic
NCT03911934 COMPLETED NA