Prioritising Patient Medication Review: Hospitals Reaching Out
NCT ID: NCT06451692
Last Updated: 2024-09-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-17
2027-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Medication Reviews to Polypharmacy Patients
NCT04945447
Pharmacist-led Medicines Management Outpatient Service
NCT01534559
Telephone Contact Between Hospital and General Practitioner About Medication Review for Older Patients
NCT03369652
Polypharmacy Outpatient Clinic
NCT03911934
The Pharmacist Follows You and Your Medication From Hospital to Your Daily Life and Investigate What This Means to You
NCT03079375
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As the population ages, the concept of frailty becomes increasing in the provision of health care to an ageing population, and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) can be used as a judgement-based frailty tool to evaluate specific domains including comorbidity, function, and cognition to generate a frailty score. In addition, an attempt to detect patients at high risk of medication errors is the Medicine Risk Score (MERIS) where acutely admitted patients are allocated into low and high risk of potential ADEs by predefined detection limits. Further, These components will be used to determine
In addition, an understudied patient group within polypharmacy and PIPs, are patients with dementia creating inequality among patient groups. The use of polypharmacy and Potential Inappropriate Prescribing are widespread in this patient group, and dementia is well-known to have a negative effect on overall mortality, which demonstrates the need for interventions to improve medication treatment in people with dementia. Intervention studies have examined the effects of pharmacist-led medication reviews in different hospital settings with various outcomes, but no exact model for prioritising patient medication review exists. Thus, there is a need to identify patients who will benefit most from a medication review in terms of outcomes, such as readmission, emergency department and general practitioner contacts. The aim of this project is to examine the effect of a cross-sectoral medication review between a clinical pharmacist and a medical specialist in coordination with the General Practitioner (GP), including patients from Hospital Sønderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Denmark (SHS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
The clinical pharmacist will assess the patient's medication, and perform interviews with the patient and/or the patient's attorney-in-fact. Potential medical recommendations will be discussed with the treating hospital clinician and the clinical pharmacist, and a medication plan will be developed together with the patient or the patient's attorney-in-fact. The GPs will be informed through optimized discharge summaries.
Clinical pharmacist
The clinical pharmacist calls the patients' GP 90 days after discharge for follow-up
Control group
Patients in the control group receive standard care without a clinical pharmacist involved in the healthcare team at ward level. Standard care consists of usual treatment from a team of hospital physicians, nurses, nurse assistants, and as needed occupational therapists, physiotherapist, and clinical dieticians. Hospital physicians and/or nurses might perform patient counselling about medication treatment during hospitalization
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical pharmacist
The clinical pharmacist calls the patients' GP 90 days after discharge for follow-up
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sygehus Sønderjylland
Aabenraa, Southern Denmark, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SHS-Pharm2 - 2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.