Machine Learning Versus Traditional Scores in Predicting Erythrocyte Need
NCT ID: NCT06594484
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
430 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-02-22
2024-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Machine Learning Model for Perioperative Transfusion Prediction
NCT05228548
Haematologic Predictors and Clinical Outcome in Cardiac Surgery
NCT02653885
SvO2 Trigger in Transfusion Strategy After Cardiac Surgery
NCT02761564
The Effect of Blood Transfusion on Venoarterial PCO2 Difference in Cardiac Surgery
NCT03245502
Moderate Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery Post Operative
NCT02712879
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the current study, a new estimation system created with the ML algorithm was compared with the known estimation systems. Comparing the ML algorithm with 6 different classical scoring systems is important in terms of demonstrating the potential of this technology.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether the model created with ML in predicting perioperative blood product consumption in cardiovascular surgeries is superior to predictive scoring systems that have proven themselves in the literature. Secondary aim is to compare the predictive value of using more than one scoring system in combination.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
General Anesthesia Group
The need for ES was recorded in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
Ml Based Algorithm 1
The values in the ML algorithm were selected according to logistic regression analysis and the values used in the other six scores tested. The success rate of the constructed networks correct predictions was considered as the success rate of the algorithm. The usefulness of the test was determined through AUROC analysis. Two algorithms were tested in our study. In the first algorithm (ML1), the dependent variable was erythrocyte suspension (ES) consumption, and the independent variables included patients; demographic data, laboratory data, and operational data
Ml Based Algroithm 2
is an Ml algorithm created by combining commonly used bleeding scores
Bleeding Scores
ACTION CRUSCADE TRACK WILL-BLEED PAPWORTH TRUST ACTAPORT skores used to predict ES need
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ml Based Algorithm 1
The values in the ML algorithm were selected according to logistic regression analysis and the values used in the other six scores tested. The success rate of the constructed networks correct predictions was considered as the success rate of the algorithm. The usefulness of the test was determined through AUROC analysis. Two algorithms were tested in our study. In the first algorithm (ML1), the dependent variable was erythrocyte suspension (ES) consumption, and the independent variables included patients; demographic data, laboratory data, and operational data
Ml Based Algroithm 2
is an Ml algorithm created by combining commonly used bleeding scores
Bleeding Scores
ACTION CRUSCADE TRACK WILL-BLEED PAPWORTH TRUST ACTAPORT skores used to predict ES need
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency surgery
* İntraoperative mortality
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kocaeli City Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmet Yuksek
md
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kocaeli City Hospital
Kocaeli, Izmıt, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Park J, Bonde PN. Machine Learning in Cardiac Surgery: Predicting Mortality and Readmission. ASAIO J. 2022 Dec 1;68(12):1490-1500. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001696. Epub 2022 May 9.
El-Sherbini AH, Shah A, Cheng R, Elsebaie A, Harby AA, Redfearn D, El-Diasty M. Machine Learning for Predicting Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Scoping Review of Current Literature. Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 15;209:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.079. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
Shahian DM, Lippmann RP. Commentary: Machine learning and cardiac surgery risk prediction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jun;163(6):2090-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.058. Epub 2020 Aug 24. No abstract available.
Miles TJ, Ghanta RK. Machine learning in cardiac surgery: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):2644-2653. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1659. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
Tseng PY, Chen YT, Wang CH, Chiu KM, Peng YS, Hsu SP, Chen KL, Yang CY, Lee OK. Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning. Crit Care. 2020 Jul 31;24(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03179-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-6
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.