Machine Learning Versus Traditional Scores in Predicting Erythrocyte Need

NCT ID: NCT06594484

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

430 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-22

Study Completion Date

2024-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, we compared perioperative bleeding prediction scores with our machine learning-based prediction system in predicting the need for erythrocyte suspension during cardiovascular surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The success of ML algorithms in predicting perioperative blood product use in CABG remains an under-tested topic. Unnecessary preparation of blood products or not being able to supply them when necessary is critical for both patient safety and the effective use of hospital resources \[8\]. Bleeding amounts and blood product use strategies can vary with institute protocols. Scoring systems that determine the general framework may not perform well due to local factors. ML algorithms can be created locally according to previous patient data of each clinic and can improve themselves with learning mechanisms, suggesting significant potential in this field.

In the current study, a new estimation system created with the ML algorithm was compared with the known estimation systems. Comparing the ML algorithm with 6 different classical scoring systems is important in terms of demonstrating the potential of this technology.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the model created with ML in predicting perioperative blood product consumption in cardiovascular surgeries is superior to predictive scoring systems that have proven themselves in the literature. Secondary aim is to compare the predictive value of using more than one scoring system in combination.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Erythrocyte Transfusion Machine Learning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

General Anesthesia Group

The need for ES was recorded in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

Ml Based Algorithm 1

Intervention Type OTHER

The values in the ML algorithm were selected according to logistic regression analysis and the values used in the other six scores tested. The success rate of the constructed networks correct predictions was considered as the success rate of the algorithm. The usefulness of the test was determined through AUROC analysis. Two algorithms were tested in our study. In the first algorithm (ML1), the dependent variable was erythrocyte suspension (ES) consumption, and the independent variables included patients; demographic data, laboratory data, and operational data

Ml Based Algroithm 2

Intervention Type OTHER

is an Ml algorithm created by combining commonly used bleeding scores

Bleeding Scores

Intervention Type OTHER

ACTION CRUSCADE TRACK WILL-BLEED PAPWORTH TRUST ACTAPORT skores used to predict ES need

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ml Based Algorithm 1

The values in the ML algorithm were selected according to logistic regression analysis and the values used in the other six scores tested. The success rate of the constructed networks correct predictions was considered as the success rate of the algorithm. The usefulness of the test was determined through AUROC analysis. Two algorithms were tested in our study. In the first algorithm (ML1), the dependent variable was erythrocyte suspension (ES) consumption, and the independent variables included patients; demographic data, laboratory data, and operational data

Intervention Type OTHER

Ml Based Algroithm 2

is an Ml algorithm created by combining commonly used bleeding scores

Intervention Type OTHER

Bleeding Scores

ACTION CRUSCADE TRACK WILL-BLEED PAPWORTH TRUST ACTAPORT skores used to predict ES need

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Data from patients who underwent isolated CABG surgeries in the cardiac and vascular surgery operating rooms between 01.01.2023 and 01.01.2024 were evaluated.

Exclusion Criteria

* Missing Data
* Emergency surgery
* İntraoperative mortality
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kocaeli City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmet Yuksek

md

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kocaeli City Hospital

Kocaeli, Izmıt, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Park J, Bonde PN. Machine Learning in Cardiac Surgery: Predicting Mortality and Readmission. ASAIO J. 2022 Dec 1;68(12):1490-1500. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001696. Epub 2022 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35544455 (View on PubMed)

El-Sherbini AH, Shah A, Cheng R, Elsebaie A, Harby AA, Redfearn D, El-Diasty M. Machine Learning for Predicting Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Scoping Review of Current Literature. Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 15;209:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.079. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37871512 (View on PubMed)

Shahian DM, Lippmann RP. Commentary: Machine learning and cardiac surgery risk prediction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jun;163(6):2090-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.058. Epub 2020 Aug 24. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32951875 (View on PubMed)

Miles TJ, Ghanta RK. Machine learning in cardiac surgery: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):2644-2653. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1659. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38738250 (View on PubMed)

Tseng PY, Chen YT, Wang CH, Chiu KM, Peng YS, Hsu SP, Chen KL, Yang CY, Lee OK. Prediction of the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery by machine learning. Crit Care. 2020 Jul 31;24(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03179-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32736589 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-6

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Transfusion in Cardiac Valve Surgery
NCT06332547 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA