Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vagus Nerve Stimulation as Treatment for Long Covid
NCT05608629
Vagus Nerve Stimulation to the Ear to Improve Symptoms in Post-COVID-19 and ME/CFS
NCT06968104
Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Post COVID Fatigue
NCT05445427
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Improved Recovery After Exertion.
NCT06510985
Auricular Vagus Stimulation in Obesity
NCT05230628
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The need for the proposed trial is supported by an earlier open label tVNS trial in 15 PASC patients who also fulfilled the 1994 case criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome \[ME/CFS but for simplicity CFS\]. The research team chose patients with PASC-CFS for two reasons: first, CFS following Covid infection is probably the most common subgroup of patients with PASC. In the study, of 41 PASC patients whose continued symptoms over time lead to their being referred for cardiopulmonary exercise tests, 47% fulfilled the 1994 case criteria for the diagnosis of CFS. Second, the research team limited the tVNS pilot to PASC-CFS to reduce the heterogeneity inherent in the diagnosis of PASC. The research team specifically recruited non-hospitalized patients with documented Covid who remained ill with fatigue, widespread pain, cognitive complaints, and post-exertional malaise for at least 6 months after the acute infection, thus fulfilling the 1994 case criteria for CFS. Importantly, the entire study was done remotely without requiring participants to come into the medical center or stop current medical treatments.
The research team proposes to extend this study to inform us which of two possible ways of stimulating the vagus is the most effective in improving the health of PASC-CFS patients. The study again will be done remotely with the study team having access to large databases of non-hospitalized PASC sufferers. After determination that a patient had Covid, continued ill with PASC and now fulfills criteria for the diagnosis of CFS, the participant will be asked to respond to questionnaires via RedCap as to magnitude of fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, widespread pain and/or post-exertional malaise, as well as their functional status. Each will then be randomized into Treatment A or B and sent the device for these two treatment limbs with instructions to use the device for 35 min a day in the morning over a 6-week period.
During the fifth week of study participation, participants will receive a stick-on device \[as well as instructions via zoom\] to allow them to use the device to provide data on heart rate variability - an objective measure of treatment success. Participants will do this for a 6-minute period in the afternoon and then return the device to the study team.
Participants will complete questionnaires on RedCap at the end of the first 6-week phase and return the device to the study team to determine usage. Participants will be told they must use their device for at least 30 of the 42 days in order to get access to the device that gave the best clinical outcome for an additional 6-weeks. At the end of this second 6-week period, participants will again complete questionnaires and return their device to the study team.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
#1: Patient controlled
Patient will ramp up current intensity until uncomfortable, then ratchet back to what is comfortable and press button. Patient is to do this daily for 35 minutes for 6 weeks.
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulator
A device attached to the tragus of the ear which when activated stimulates an ascending branch of the vagus nerve
#2: Device Controlled
Patients will ramp up current intensity until uncomfortable, then ratchet back to what is comfortable and press button. The device has software embedded in it that is used to arrive at a personalized way of stimulating the vagus nerve. At this level, the device stimulus will not be sensed by the patient. Patient is to do this daily for 35 minutes for 6 weeks.
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulator
A device attached to the tragus of the ear which when activated stimulates an ascending branch of the vagus nerve
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulator
A device attached to the tragus of the ear which when activated stimulates an ascending branch of the vagus nerve
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Chalder Fatigue Scale score of 4 or greater
* SF-36 Physical Function scale score ≤70
* VAS values of 3 or higher from 0 \[none\] 3 \[substantial\] to 5 \[very severe burden\] on at least two of the following symptoms - fatigue; widespread pain, brain fog, post-exertional malaise
Exclusion Criteria
* Hospitalized for COVID-19 infection
* BMI ≥30
* Pregnancy
21 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Benjamin Natelson
Professor of Neurology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benjamin H Natelson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Anna Norweg, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY-23-01007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.