Effectiveness of Audiovisual Versus Written Postoperative Instructions for Patients Undergoing Minor Hand Procedures

NCT ID: NCT06582550

Last Updated: 2024-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-19

Study Completion Date

2026-01-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The utility and effectiveness of video-based instructions (VBI) versus standard written instructions was not previously investigated in hand surgery; thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual instruction as compared to regular verbal instructions given to patients undergoing common hand procedures, including instruction recall and compliance, patient education, patient satisfaction with the information given, patient satisfaction with operative experience.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Outcomes of hand surgery are greatly dependent on factors outside the operating theater as well. These include patient compliance to preoperative instructions that consist of proper surgical site care, proper positioning, and following occupational therapy protocols. Previous studies have shown that video-based information provide greater patient satisfaction than verbal instructions. Visual information was also reported to decrease patient anxiety regarding the procedure and increases patient education in terms of procedure risks and benefits(1-5). The utility and effectiveness of video-based instructions (VBI) versus standard written instructions was not previously investigated in hand surgery; thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual instruction as compared to regular verbal instructions given to patients undergoing common hand procedures, including instruction recall and compliance, patient education, patient satisfaction with the information given, patient satisfaction with operative experience. The secondary objective is to evaluate if VBI result in better outcomes than standard written instructions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Hand Cyst Ganglion Trigger Finger

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Note that the surgical intervention is the same in both study arms. The comparison is in regards to the post-operative instructions with the aim of quality improvement.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Audiovisual Instruction Group

Patients who require a hand surgery presenting to the clinic will be divided randomly; each participant is assigned by opening a prepared envelope with a dedicated group randomly, if the patient is assigned to group 1, they will receive standard printed instructions regarding their expected postoperative care, but if the patient is assigned to group 2, they will be provided with a barcode to scan to view audiovisual instructions regarding their post-operative course

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Minor Hand Procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Unilateral minor hand procedure (carpal tunnel release, trigger finger A1 pulley release, lesion excision)

Written Instruction Group

Patients who require a hand surgery presenting to the clinic will be divided randomly; each participant is assigned by opening a prepared envelope with a dedicated group randomly, if the patient is assigned to group 1, they will receive standard printed instructions regarding their expected postoperative care, but if the patient is assigned to group 2, they will be provided with a barcode to scan to view audiovisual instructions regarding their post-operative course

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Minor Hand Procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Unilateral minor hand procedure (carpal tunnel release, trigger finger A1 pulley release, lesion excision)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Minor Hand Procedure

Unilateral minor hand procedure (carpal tunnel release, trigger finger A1 pulley release, lesion excision)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Please ensure that ALL items below are satisfied to be included in the study.

* Patient undergoing hand and/or upper extremity surgery with Dr. Thibaudeau
* Patient ≥ 18 years old
* Patient who comprehends instructions provided in English and/or French
* Patient who can navigate the internet to complete an online post-operative questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria

Please ensure that NONE of the following items are selected to be included in the study.

* Patient presenting with intra-articular, open, or pathological fractures
* Patient presenting with associated tendon or nerve injuries
* Patient receiving definitive surgery ≥21 days after injury
* Patient with previous surgeries/deformity in the hand
* Patient with pre-existing severe joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis, finger joint stiffness, or non-union)
* Patient with medical contraindications to surgery
* Patient who is unable to comply with rehabilitation
* Patient who is unwilling to be followed up
* Patient with dementia
* Patient with significant mental illness
* Patient who is unable to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephanie Thibaudeau

Assistant Professor of Plastic Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rawan ElAbd, MD MSc

Role: CONTACT

514-934-8025

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-10990

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.