Postoperative Rehabilitation Following Trapeziectomy and Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition

NCT ID: NCT01425034

Last Updated: 2019-08-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

234 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2019-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis of the thumb joint ('basal arthritis') is a common entity treated by hand surgeons in our society. It can be a significant source of functional disability secondary to a painful, and often weak, grip. Once patients have failed treatment by conservative means, such as splinting, anti-inflammatories, and cortisone injections, the next option is surgical management. Several surgical options are available depending on the severity of the disease. For the early stages of arthritis options include a ligament reconstruction or a metacarpal extension osteotomy. For advanced stages, only salvage procedures exist. These have included simple trapeziectomy, arthrodesis and implant arthroplasty. The most common procedure, however, has been a trapeziectomy with a ligament reconstruction tendon interposition

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis of the thumb joint ('basal arthritis') is a common entity treated by hand surgeons in our society. It can be a significant source of functional disability secondary to a painful, and often weak, grip. Once patients have failed treatment by conservative means, such as splinting, anti-inflammatories, and cortisone injections, the next option is surgical management. Several surgical options are available depending on the severity of the disease. For the early stages of arthritis options include a ligament reconstruction or a metacarpal extension osteotomy. For advanced stages, only salvage procedures exist. These have included simple trapeziectomy, arthrodesis and implant arthroplasty. The most common procedure, however, has been a trapeziectomy with a ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. During this procedure the arthritic trapezium is excised to remove arthritic joint surfaces, the anterior oblique ligament is reconstructed to restore thumb metacarpal stability and prevent axial shortening, and a fascial interposition is performed to reduce the likelihood of impingement between neighboring bones.

Postoperative rehabilitation and splinting protocols have varied widely between institutions. In fact, no studies have been published looking specifically at these protocols. Some institutions have taken a more conservative approach, having their patients immobilized by some means for up to twelve weeks with no motion for six weeks. Others advance their patients more quickly and start motion at four weeks with discontinuation of splinting at eight weeks.

There is one Cochrane Review on surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis that compared seven surgical techniques. They looked at outcomes of pain, physical function, range of motion, global assessment, strength, CMC imaging and adverse effects. There was no mention of a therapy protocol.1

The Hand Clinics, a comprehensive, state-of-the-art review by experts in the field, provide current, practical information of the diagnosis and treatment of conditions affecting the hand and wrist. Each issue focuses on a single topic relevant to hand surgery practice. In the most recent arthritis issue, Clinics 26 (2010), Bodin et al. discussed many surgical techniques and alluded to therapy after eight weeks of casting but no specific protocol is defined. 2

A recent book publication by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the American Society of Hand Therapists include a chapter on arthritis incorporating rehabilitation interventions following soft tissue reconstruction of the CMC joint. They advocate a more conservative approach. Up to four weeks a forearm based thumb spica cast is utilized with thumb IP range of motion and edema control. At week 5 the patient is changed to a forearm based thumb spica splint with addition of active range of motion of the wrist and thumb MP and IP joints. CMC joint range of motion is started at week 6. At this point isometric strengthening to the wrist, thenar and first dorsal interosseous muscles is initiated. At week 10 patients begin light pinch and grip exercises. The splint is discontinued week 12.3

Hand therapists find the Diagnosis and Treatment Manual by the Hand Rehabilitation Center of Indiana to be the 'bible' of hand therapy. They advocate a more aggressive, earlier motion, protocol. At week 2, a forearm based thumb spica cast or splint is placed. At week 4 active and passive range of motion to the thumb and wrist is started including palmar and radial abduction, wrist flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, and thumb circumduction, flexion, and extension. At week 6, gentle strengthening is begun with discontinuation of the splint.4

A less popular but frequently used book, Hand and Upper Extremity Rehabilitation, a practical guide, their chapter on Thumb CMC arthroplasty included a concise protocol similar to the Indiana protocol. At week 2, active and passive MCP and IP range of motion is started. At week 4, CMC abduction and extension, CMC opposition and wrist range of motion is started. At week 8, pinch and grip strength is stressed. There is no discussion about splinting. 5

Despite these published protocols, there have been no studies looking at which protocol is better. There have been no prospective, randomized trials comparing a conservative approach consisting of longer immobilization with a more aggressive approach advocating earlier motion and shorter splinting times.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthrosis of the Carpometacarpal Joint of the Thumb

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cast group

The 'Cast' group will be placed in a thumb spica short arm cast with the thumb IP joint free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

casts for the thumb

Intervention Type OTHER

The 'Cast' group will be placed in a thumb spica short arm cast with the thumb IP joint free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.

Motion group

The 'Motion' group will be placed in a forearm based thumb spica splint with the thumb IP free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Motion group

Intervention Type OTHER

The 'Motion' group will be placed in a forearm based thumb spica splint with the thumb IP free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

casts for the thumb

The 'Cast' group will be placed in a thumb spica short arm cast with the thumb IP joint free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Motion group

The 'Motion' group will be placed in a forearm based thumb spica splint with the thumb IP free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cast group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 40 years old with basal arthritis who failed conservative treatment
* Patients receiving LRTI by one of three enrolled surgeons at the U or one of the two enrolled surgeons at Intermountain who consented to the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing more procedures in addition to the LRTI that may alter the postoperative course, not including CTR or thumb MCP capsulodesis, MP fusion, trigger finger release
* h/o CRPS
* RA
* Revision LRTI
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Douglas Hutchinson

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Douglas Hutchinson, M.D,

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah Orthopedics Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

InterMountain Health Care-TOSH orthopedic center

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

49860

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.