Postoperative Rehabilitation Following Trapeziectomy and Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition
NCT ID: NCT01425034
Last Updated: 2019-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
234 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2019-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Variable Immobilization Protocol for Arthroplasty of the Carpometacarpal Joint of the Thumb
NCT04828954
The Role of the Proprioceptive Training in Functional Recovery of Patient With Thumb Base Osteoarthritis
NCT04892589
CMC I Stability Intraoperative
NCT03687775
Outcomes of Treatment for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis
NCT01724853
Occupational Therapy and Surgery in Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis
NCT01794754
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Postoperative rehabilitation and splinting protocols have varied widely between institutions. In fact, no studies have been published looking specifically at these protocols. Some institutions have taken a more conservative approach, having their patients immobilized by some means for up to twelve weeks with no motion for six weeks. Others advance their patients more quickly and start motion at four weeks with discontinuation of splinting at eight weeks.
There is one Cochrane Review on surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis that compared seven surgical techniques. They looked at outcomes of pain, physical function, range of motion, global assessment, strength, CMC imaging and adverse effects. There was no mention of a therapy protocol.1
The Hand Clinics, a comprehensive, state-of-the-art review by experts in the field, provide current, practical information of the diagnosis and treatment of conditions affecting the hand and wrist. Each issue focuses on a single topic relevant to hand surgery practice. In the most recent arthritis issue, Clinics 26 (2010), Bodin et al. discussed many surgical techniques and alluded to therapy after eight weeks of casting but no specific protocol is defined. 2
A recent book publication by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the American Society of Hand Therapists include a chapter on arthritis incorporating rehabilitation interventions following soft tissue reconstruction of the CMC joint. They advocate a more conservative approach. Up to four weeks a forearm based thumb spica cast is utilized with thumb IP range of motion and edema control. At week 5 the patient is changed to a forearm based thumb spica splint with addition of active range of motion of the wrist and thumb MP and IP joints. CMC joint range of motion is started at week 6. At this point isometric strengthening to the wrist, thenar and first dorsal interosseous muscles is initiated. At week 10 patients begin light pinch and grip exercises. The splint is discontinued week 12.3
Hand therapists find the Diagnosis and Treatment Manual by the Hand Rehabilitation Center of Indiana to be the 'bible' of hand therapy. They advocate a more aggressive, earlier motion, protocol. At week 2, a forearm based thumb spica cast or splint is placed. At week 4 active and passive range of motion to the thumb and wrist is started including palmar and radial abduction, wrist flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation, and thumb circumduction, flexion, and extension. At week 6, gentle strengthening is begun with discontinuation of the splint.4
A less popular but frequently used book, Hand and Upper Extremity Rehabilitation, a practical guide, their chapter on Thumb CMC arthroplasty included a concise protocol similar to the Indiana protocol. At week 2, active and passive MCP and IP range of motion is started. At week 4, CMC abduction and extension, CMC opposition and wrist range of motion is started. At week 8, pinch and grip strength is stressed. There is no discussion about splinting. 5
Despite these published protocols, there have been no studies looking at which protocol is better. There have been no prospective, randomized trials comparing a conservative approach consisting of longer immobilization with a more aggressive approach advocating earlier motion and shorter splinting times.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cast group
The 'Cast' group will be placed in a thumb spica short arm cast with the thumb IP joint free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.
casts for the thumb
The 'Cast' group will be placed in a thumb spica short arm cast with the thumb IP joint free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.
Motion group
The 'Motion' group will be placed in a forearm based thumb spica splint with the thumb IP free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.
Motion group
The 'Motion' group will be placed in a forearm based thumb spica splint with the thumb IP free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
casts for the thumb
The 'Cast' group will be placed in a thumb spica short arm cast with the thumb IP joint free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.
Motion group
The 'Motion' group will be placed in a forearm based thumb spica splint with the thumb IP free. They will be allowed digit, thumb IP and elbow range of motion.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients receiving LRTI by one of three enrolled surgeons at the U or one of the two enrolled surgeons at Intermountain who consented to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* h/o CRPS
* RA
* Revision LRTI
40 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Douglas Hutchinson
M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Douglas Hutchinson, M.D,
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Utah Orthopedics Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
InterMountain Health Care-TOSH orthopedic center
Murray, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
49860
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.