Restoration of Thumb Strength and Function in Basal Joint Arthritis: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial (RESTART)
NCT ID: NCT04458584
Last Updated: 2025-04-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
165 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-06-29
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and metacarpal stabilization is associated with superior functional outcomes and strength,
2. Preservation of the arthroplasty space correlates with functional outcomes, pain relief, and restoration of strength after basal joint arthroplasty, and
3. Mitigation of metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) hyperextension optimizes postoperative strength after basal joint arthroplasty, regardless of surgical technique.
It is hypothesized that thumb basal joint arthroplasty with metacarpal stabilization, by either ligament reconstruction (I) or suture suspension (II), provides greater improvement in grip and pinch strength, and better hand function, than might be achieved following provision of pain relief alone by simple trapeziectomy (III). Preservation of the arthroplasty space will correlate positively, and MCPJ hyperextension will correlate negatively, with improved thumb function and lateral pinch strength.
Primary Aims (within 3 procedure cohorts):
1. Compare pre-operative pinch and grip strength as well as patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for pain in patients before and after lidocaine injection of the trapeziometacarpal joint, prior to thumb basal joint arthroplasty;
2. Compare post-operative pinch and grip strength and PROs for pain and function at 3 and 6 months after thumb basal joint arthroplasty with pre-operative values before and after lidocaine injection;
3. Correlate preservation of dynamic arthroplasty space as measured on a stress radiograph with postoperative improvement in pinch and grip strength, and PROs for pain and function;
4. Correlate dynamic MCP joint position and laxity with change in strength and patient-reported pain and function to define optimal MCPJ position.
Secondary Aims (between 3 procedure cohorts):
1. Compare change in pre- and post-operative pinch and grip strength and PROs for pain and function between patients having basal joint arthroplasty with and without specific metacarpal stabilization;
2. Compare preservation of the dynamic arthroplasty space and improvement in strength and patient-reported pain and function between arthroplasty groups; and
3. Compare changes in pinch and grip strength and PROs for pain and function with dynamic MCPJ position between arthroplasty groups.
4. Compare postoperative neuritis and complications between surgical groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Distraction vs Interposition Arthroplasty for Basilar Thumb Osteoarthritis
NCT04155853
Ligament Reconstruction Weilby vs Simple Trapeziectomy
NCT03858946
Trapeziectomy Suspensionplasty Versus Carpometacarpal Joint Replacement in Treatment of Basal Thumb Osteoarthritis
NCT04588961
Trapeziectomy: Internal Brace vs. Ligament Reconstruction (Prospective)
NCT05753891
Pinch Grip and Functional Outcomes Between Hematoma Distraction Arthroplasty Versus Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition Arthroplasty in Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis.
NCT06858800
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ligament Reconstruction - Tendon Interposition (LRTI)
Patients undergoing thumb basal joint arthroplasty using LRTI procedure as treatment of osteoarthritis.
Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction (I; LRTI)
Thumb basal joint arthroplasty (surgical) using Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction (I; LRTI)
Suture Suspensionplasty (SS)
Patients undergoing thumb basal joint arthroplasty using suture suspensionplasty (SS) procedure as treatment of osteoarthritis.
Trapeziectomy with suture suspensionplasty (II; SS)
Thumb basal joint arthroplasty (surgical) using Trapeziectomy with suture suspension-lastly (II; SS)
Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy (AT)
Patients undergoing thumb basal joint arthroplasty using arthroscopic trapeziectomy (AT) procedure as treatment of osteoarthritis.
Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy (III; AT)
Thumb basal joint arthroplasty (surgical) using Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy (III; AT)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction (I; LRTI)
Thumb basal joint arthroplasty (surgical) using Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction (I; LRTI)
Trapeziectomy with suture suspensionplasty (II; SS)
Thumb basal joint arthroplasty (surgical) using Trapeziectomy with suture suspension-lastly (II; SS)
Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy (III; AT)
Thumb basal joint arthroplasty (surgical) using Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy (III; AT)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing elective non-prosthetic, primary basal joint arthroplasty;
* Patient has necessary mental capacity to participate and comply with study protocol;
* Patient is willing and able to give informed consent; and
* Patient is willing to participate under the care of their chosen surgeon.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral hand procedures of any nature;
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
* Women of reproductive potential unless there is a negative urine pregnancy test on the day of surgery. Women of child bearing potential include those who are premenopausal who have not had a bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal is defined as not having had a menstrual period for at least one calendar year.
* Vulnerable patient populations including prisoners and institutionalized individuals.
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vincent D. Pellegrini
Staff Physician, Orthopaedics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vincent D Pellegrini, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D20092
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.