Postoperative Care After Carpal Tunnel Release Using Short Educational Videos

NCT ID: NCT06647719

Last Updated: 2024-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a patient-directed postoperative care program, using short educational videos, can improve patient satisfaction and reduce healthcare resource utilization in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Will patients in the video-based care program be more satisfied with their postoperative care? Will this approach reduce healthcare resource use and the burden on patients without increasing complication rates? Researchers will compare the video-based patient-directed care group to the standard in-person follow-up group to see if patient satisfaction and resource use differ while maintaining similar outcomes and complication rates.

Participants will:

Watch three short educational videos (\< 60 seconds each) on postoperative care. Schedule a suture removal appointment with a nurse at their convenience if needed.

Continue to have access to their provider through traditional methods such as phone, EMR, or urgent in-person visits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a commonly performed procedure with predictable outcomes and a low complication rate. Traditionally, patients are scheduled for two postoperative follow-up visits-one at two weeks and another at six weeks. However, these routine visits rarely lead to a change in patient management and often impose logistical and financial burdens on patients, particularly for those living in rural areas who must travel long distances to their healthcare provider's clinic.

This study proposes an alternative postoperative care model for CTR patients that leverages short educational videos and allows patients to manage their recovery more independently. The experimental group in the study will receive three brief (\< 60 seconds each) educational videos after surgery. These videos will cover key aspects of postoperative care, including wound management and when to seek medical attention. Unlike the traditional model, patients in this group will not have scheduled in-person or virtual follow-up visits unless they require them. All patients in the experimental group will still have access to their healthcare provider through standard communication channels, such as:

Calling the office for advice or concerns. Sending secure messages through the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Attending urgent in-person visits if necessary. If nonabsorbable sutures are used during surgery, patients in the experimental group will schedule an appointment for suture removal with a nurse at their convenience, usually 10-14 days post-surgery.

The primary goal of the study is to determine whether this patient-directed care model, which utilizes educational videos, can improve patient satisfaction and reduce the use of healthcare resources without compromising care quality or increasing complication rates.

Specific Aim: The study aims to evaluate whether a patient-directed postoperative care program for CTR can:

Improve patient satisfaction. Reduce healthcare resource utilization. Lessen the burden of care (e.g., fewer missed workdays and less time spent on healthcare-related activities).

Maintain comparable patient-reported outcomes, complication rates, and the number of urgent visits as those observed in traditional in-person follow-up care.

Hypotheses:

Patients who receive the educational videos will report higher satisfaction with their care.

These patients will miss fewer days of work and spend less time on health-related activities.

The experimental group will consume fewer healthcare resources (e.g., fewer clinic visits).

Patient-reported outcomes, complication rates, and urgent visits will be similar between the experimental and standard in-person care groups.

Significance: The results of this study have the potential to transform and enhance postoperative care for patients undergoing CTR and other minor surgical procedures. By reducing the need for routine in-person visits, the proposed care model can help alleviate the burden on patients, particularly those from rural areas. Additionally, reducing clinic utilization for straightforward postoperative cases could increase the availability of clinic appointments for more complex cases, thereby improving overall healthcare system efficiency. This patient-directed model could also be expanded to other surgical and nonsurgical conditions, empowering patients to take a more active role in their recovery while maintaining high standards of care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patient Satisfaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of Care

In-person group will be followed with standard -of-care postoperative clinic visits with a hand \& upper extremity orthopaedic surgeon at Carilion Clinic Institute for Orthopaedics and Neurosciences at 2 weeks and 6 weeks from date of service.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Video Management

Postoperative education will be provided with 3 short videos that will be accessible to patients on all social media platforms and through MyChart with no scheduled in person postoperative visits. Patients will have a one time visit with either nurse or orthopaedic technician for suture removal 10-14 days from surgery if the participant has nonabsorbable sutures placed during surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Educational Videos

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects in the experimental group will be provided with 3 links to videos to be watched after CTR surgery. These videos will be available through YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, or MyChart. Videos will be available to watch multiple times at the subjects choice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Educational Videos

Subjects in the experimental group will be provided with 3 links to videos to be watched after CTR surgery. These videos will be available through YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, or MyChart. Videos will be available to watch multiple times at the subjects choice.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing either endoscopic (CPT 29848) or open CTR (CPT 64721)
* Access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer to view educational videos
* Access to internet to download or view postoperative education videos
* Age 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing any additional procedures
* Worker's compensation status
* Revision procedures
* Patients unable to utilize technology to view videos or follow instructions
* Patients with no access to internet
* Inability to provide informed consent for the study
* Patients unable to speak English fluently
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Carilion Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cesar J Bravo

Orthopedic Hand and Upper Extremity Surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cesar Bravo, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Carilion Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Carilion Clinic Orthopaedic Surgery

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Greenfield PT, Manz WJ, DeMaio EL, Duddleston SH, Xerogeanes JW, Scott Maughon T, Spencer CC, Dawes A, Boden SD, Hammond KE, Wagner ER, Gottschalk MB, Daly CA, Pombo MW. Telehealth Can Be Implemented Across a Musculoskeletal Service Line Without Compromising Patient Satisfaction. HSS J. 2021 Feb;17(1):36-45. doi: 10.1177/1556331620977171. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33967640 (View on PubMed)

https://www. pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/?menuItem=81867c91- 92ad-45b8-a964-a2a894f873ef

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kim SH, Koh WU, Rhim JH, Karm MH, Yu HS, Lee BY, Shin JW, Leem JG. Preconsent video-assisted instruction improves the comprehension and satisfaction in elderly patient visiting pain clinic. Korean J Pain. 2012 Oct;25(4):254-7. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2012.25.4.254. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23091686 (View on PubMed)

Denny MC, Vahidy F, Vu KY, Sharrief AZ, Savitz SI. Video-based educational intervention associated with improved stroke literacy, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3):e0171952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171952. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28333925 (View on PubMed)

Kim S, Ju MK, Son S, Jun S, Lee SY, Han CS. Development of video-based educational materials for kidney-transplant patients. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0236750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236750. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32745145 (View on PubMed)

Veldhuijzen G, Klemt-Kropp M, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, van Balkom B, van Esch AAJ, Drenth JPH. Computer-based patient education is non-inferior to nurse counselling prior to colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):254-263. doi: 10.1055/a-1225-8708. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32702759 (View on PubMed)

Kuba MHM, Izuka BH. One Brace: One Visit: Treatment of Pediatric Distal Radius Buckle Fractures With a Removable Wrist Brace and No Follow-up Visit. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Jul;38(6):e338-e342. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001169.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29529004 (View on PubMed)

Gamble D, Jenkins PJ, Edge MJ, Gilmour A, Anthony IC, Nugent M, Rymaszewski LA. Satisfaction and functional outcome with "self-care" for the management of fifth metacarpal fractures. Hand (N Y). 2015 Dec;10(4):607-12. doi: 10.1007/s11552-015-9749-8. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26568712 (View on PubMed)

Vusirikala A, Ensor D, Asokan AK, Lee AJ, Ray R, Tsekes D, Edwin J. Hello, can you hear me? Orthopaedic clinic telephone consultations in the COVID-19 era- a patient and clinician perspective. World J Orthop. 2021 Jan 18;12(1):24-34. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.24. eCollection 2021 Jan 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33520679 (View on PubMed)

Orrange S, Patel A, Mack WJ, Cassetta J. Patient Satisfaction and Trust in Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Apr 22;8(2):e28589. doi: 10.2196/28589.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33822736 (View on PubMed)

Reider-Demer M, Raja P, Martin N, Schwinger M, Babayan D. Prospective and retrospective study of videoconference telemedicine follow-up after elective neurosurgery: results of a pilot program. Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):497-501. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0878-0. Epub 2017 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28735437 (View on PubMed)

Kane LT, Thakar O, Jamgochian G, Lazarus MD, Abboud JA, Namdari S, Horneff JG. The role of telehealth as a platform for postoperative visits following rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Apr;29(4):775-783. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32197766 (View on PubMed)

Williams M, Amin A, Getgood A, Hallam P, Chojnowski AJ, Chapman PG. Telephone clinic follow-up following carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Oct;33(5):641-4. doi: 10.1177/1753193408090124. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18579622 (View on PubMed)

Grandizio LC, Mettler AW, Caselli ME, Pavis EJ. Telemedicine After Upper Extremity Surgery: A Prospective Study of Program Implementation. J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Sep;45(9):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32693989 (View on PubMed)

Kummerow Broman K, Roumie CL, Stewart MK, Castellanos JA, Tarpley JL, Dittus RS, Pierce RA. Implementation of a Telephone Postoperative Clinic in an Integrated Health System. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27545100 (View on PubMed)

Parisien RL, Shin M, Constant M, Saltzman BM, Li X, Levine WN, Trofa DP. Telehealth Utilization in Response to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun 1;28(11):e487-e492. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00339.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32459409 (View on PubMed)

https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Rizzi AM, Polachek WS, Dulas M, Strelzow JA, Hynes KK. The new 'normal': Rapid adoption of telemedicine in orthopaedics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Injury. 2020 Dec;51(12):2816-2821. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32951916 (View on PubMed)

Sultan AA, Acuna AJ, Samuel LT, Rabin JM, Grits D, Gurd DP, Kuivila TE, Goodwin RC. Utilization of Telemedicine Virtual Visits in Pediatric Spinal Deformity Patients: A Comparison of Feasibility and Patient Satisfaction at a Large Academic Center. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Sep;40(8):e712-e715. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001553.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32235192 (View on PubMed)

Halonen LM, Vasara H, Stenroos A, Kosola J. Routine follow-up is unnecessary after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures-Analysis of 995 cases. Injury. 2020 Jun;51(6):1343-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.033. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32220506 (View on PubMed)

Tofte JN, Anthony CA, Polgreen PM, Buckwalter JA, Caldwell LS, Fowler TP, Ebinger T, Hanley JM, Dowdle SB, Holte AJ, Arpey NC, Lawler EA. Postoperative care via smartphone following carpal tunnel release. J Telemed Telecare. 2020 May;26(4):223-231. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18807606. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30428766 (View on PubMed)

Zhang D, Blazar P, Earp BE. Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):471-476. doi: 10.1177/1558944718765226. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29557679 (View on PubMed)

Matsis R, Chou J, Clode N. Outcome of carpal tunnel decompression with pre-surgical diagnosis determined on general practitioner assessment and nerve conduction study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Sep 6;13:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.028. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33717870 (View on PubMed)

Sun Cao P, Loewenstein SN, Timsina LR, Adkinson JM. The Association of Insurance Status and Complications After Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):192-197. doi: 10.1177/1558944721990818. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33631982 (View on PubMed)

Fajardo M, Kim SH, Szabo RM. Incidence of carpal tunnel release: trends and implications within the United States ambulatory care setting. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Aug;37(8):1599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.035. Epub 2012 Jun 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22727925 (View on PubMed)

Luckhaupt SE, Dahlhamer JM, Ward BW, Sweeney MH, Sestito JP, Calvert GM. Prevalence and work-relatedness of carpal tunnel syndrome in the working population, United States, 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Ind Med. 2013 Jun;56(6):615-24. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22048. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22495886 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-21-1469

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Carpal Tunnel Release Efficacy Trial
NCT06934187 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA