A Post-Market, Retrospective Study on 3D Metal Tibial and Femoral Cones
NCT ID: NCT06578897
Last Updated: 2025-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
118 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-02-13
2025-02-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
i. The addition of a box which allows a stem to be inserted into the femoral canal; ii. The addition of screw lugs so that augments can be placed on the distal and posterior resections, and; iii. The box which also allows various levels of constraint to be added to the polyethylene insert. The tibial component offers the ability to place augments.
Indications for Use:
The GMK® Total Knee System is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components.
This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:
* Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis
* Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle
* Post traumatic loss of joint configuration
* Primary implantation failure
* Ligamentous Instability
Tibial augments are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement. In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the tibial and on the femoral component.
GMK® Revision femoral components are manufactured of Cobalt Chromium Molybdenum (CoCrMo) according to ISO 5832-4:1996, Implants for Surgery- Metallic materials - Part 4: Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Casting Alloy, the same as the GMK® Primary femoral components. They have an asymmetric patellar groove (left and right) with different radii of curvature in coronal plane as well as non-parallel anterior and posterior cuts (wedge shape). The GMK® Revision posterior stabilized femoral components are designed for use without cruciate ligaments when additional stability is required to prevent subluxation of the femur to the tibia in flexion, same as the GMK® Primary femoral components.
In case of severe bone loss, the tibial cones and femoral cones may be used to respectively reinforce the proximal tibia cavity and the distal femoral cavity, providing structural support and load redistribution on the remaining bone. Being an integral part of revision TKA for patients with such bone loss, the clinical outcomes for revision TKAs using the cone components are important for the knowledge regarding performance and survivorship of the Revision TKA as a whole.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Unicondylar- or Total Knee Replacement? Patient Satisfaction, Function and Muscle Mass
NCT02563756
A Study Using Metaphyseal Cones Versus a Cemented Stem Construct in Revision TKR
NCT03169634
Stability of the Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis
NCT02577978
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Robot Assisted Total Knee Replacement Outcomes
NCT03523897
Post Market, Retrospective Study to Evaluate Patients Implanted With Medacta Versafit Cup DM ™️ 2 Years Post-op
NCT03897387
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3D Metal Tibial and Femoral cones
* To collect retrospective clinical outcomes and data on revision TKAs using Medacta GMK Revision with 3D metal tibial and femoral cones
* Evaluate the patient reported functionality of the operated knee
* Evaluate the clinical and radiological performance
* Evaluate safety of the cones
* Evaluate survivorship of revisions using tibial and femoral cones
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must have received a Medacta GMK Revision component using 3D metal tibial and femoral cones
* Must be at minimum 1 year (12 months) post-treatment
* No age limit criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects that were incarcerated at the time of surgery.
* History of alcoholism
* On chemotherapy or radiation therapy during the time of interest
* Habitual use of narcotic pain medications prior to surgery or after surgery for reasons other than knee pain
* History of a metabolic disorder affecting the skeletal system other than osteoarthritis or osteoporosis
* History of chronic pain issues for reasons other than knee pain
* Progressive local or systemic infection during time of interest
* Muscular loss, neuromuscular disease, or vascular deficiency of the affected limb
* Obesity or excessive weight of subject
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medacta International SA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MUSA-CONES1-2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.