Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-01

Study Completion Date

2018-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the functional outcomes of Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) and Conventional Instrumentation TKA at the 8-year follow-up.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Effects of Computer Navigation Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty on Endothelial Damage Marker Levels

NCT02206321

Computer-assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Total Knee Replacement

UNKNOWN

Comparison Between Brainlab Knee 3 Computer-assisted Navigation Systems and Conventional Instruments in TKA: a Prospective Cohort Study.

NCT04960345

Total Knee Arthroplasty

UNKNOWN

CAS vs Standard Technique in TKA: Comparison of Clinical and Functional Results

NCT06608745

Knee Arthroplasty, Total

RECRUITING NA

Comparison of Highly Cross-Linked and Conventional Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT02020057

Osteoarthritis, Knee

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Radiological, Clinical, Functional Outcomes Between Anatomically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT04183985

Knee Arthropathy Anatomically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The data of the present study was collected from the review of the medical chart of the patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAS) TKA in one limb and conventional TKA. Then, comparing the functional outcomes of CAS and Conventional Instrumentation was performed by statistical software.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthropathy of Knee Joint

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA

the patients who were received CAS TKA in one limb

Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TKAs were performed using the image-free CAS navigation system VectorVision

Conventional TKA

the patients who were received conventional TKA in one limb

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer-Assisted Navigation TKA

TKAs were performed using the image-free CAS navigation system VectorVision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patients who were scheduled to undergo staged bilateral TKA and randomly assigned to receive CAS TKA in one limb and conventional TKA in the other at the 8-year follow-up.