The Clinical Impact of Cobas® Eplex Blood Culture Panels for the Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia
NCT ID: NCT06576258
Last Updated: 2025-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-19
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fast Assay for Pathogen Identification and Characterization
NCT03841162
Impact of the Blood Culture Technique on the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis
NCT03153384
Infections Caused by ESbL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Italy
NCT00404625
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Parameters of Cefoxitin in Women With Acute Pyelonephritis Without Severity Symptoms Due to Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Producing Escherichia Coli
NCT01820793
Optimization Management Study of Community Urinary Tract Infections Spectrum
NCT03655548
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The gold standard for diagnosis of BSIs is through blood cultures. To detect bacteremia or fungemia, blood from patients is collected and incubated in blood culture bottles. When using conventional culture methods, a positive blood bottle is investigated using direct microscopic investigation, gram-staining, inoculation of selective and non-selective agars, MALDI-TOF identification, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and standardized AST methods. These methods require several (manual) steps and days of turn-around-time. Following the collection of a blood culture, time to result depends on several factors such as the time needed for transporting the blood bottles and loading in the incubator, the growth rate of bacteria or fungi as well as the time to obtain the identification and AST result.
Rapid diagnostic tests to improve the time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy have been developed. Most tests involve organism identification and genotypic resistance profiles. Rapid molecular diagnostic testing, such as multiplex PCR methods, enable early identification of bacteria or fungi and their antimicrobial resistance genes (results within less than 2 hours after initiation of the test). This helps minimize the time needed to initiate effective antimicrobial therapy. Commercial diagnostic systems to accelerate the identification and detection of antibiotic resistance genes of causative pathogens in BSI have been developed. Examples include Cepheid® GeneXpert, BioFire® FilmArray®TM, and Roche eplex®. The system used in this study, the eplex system, is a random access multiplex PCR platform combining extraction of nucleic acids and rapid RT-PCR. Three Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panels are used to identify the disease-causing organisms: Gram-positive panel, Gram-negative panel and Fungal Pathogen panel. These panels are designed to detect 56 different organisms covering 95% of pathogens commonly associated with BSIs and 10 common antibiotic resistance genes.
The objective of this study is to assess the impact of rapid molecular testing on positive blood cultures with the cobas® eplex system (Roche) on antibiotic therapy and patient outcome.
In this study, we prospectively evaluate the performance of the eplex system for pathogen identification and detection of resistance markers compared to routine SOC for bloodstream infections. The potential impact of the eplex on time to optimization (inititiation, discontinuation, escalation or de-escalation) of antimicrobial therapy and patient outcome will be evaluated.
In summary, Finally, this study will evaluate the potential benefits of implementing CE-IVD registered syndromic diagnostic testing of bloodstream infections.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group (eplex implementation)
Positive blood culture samples from the intervention group are subjected to eplex multiplex PCR in addition to the SOC culture methods. cobas® eplex system with syndromic panels is a medical device designed for in vitro diagnostic use and is CE-IVD registered. The medical device is used in accordance with the terms of the CE mark.
cobas eplex multiplex PCR
Positive blood culture samples from the intervention group are subjected to cobas eplex multiplex PCR in addition to the SOC culture methods.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cobas eplex multiplex PCR
Positive blood culture samples from the intervention group are subjected to cobas eplex multiplex PCR in addition to the SOC culture methods.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients hospitalized from blood draw (at least 24h)
* For pediatric patient only BSI episodes caused by gram-negative organisms
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients in comfort care or with an estimated survival before sepsis of less than one month
* Patients with positive blood culture bottles within the past 14 days
* Patients for which the blood bottles are highly suspected of contaminants (bacterial species belonging to potential skin commensals or known environmental contaminants) and in the absence of any other site of infections.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Roche Diagnostics GmbH
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Antwerp
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Veerle Matheeussen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Antwerp
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Antwerp
Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EGDE-3742
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.