Stakeholder Perspectives on the Need for a Digital Solution in Pediatric Rehabilitation
NCT ID: NCT06570148
Last Updated: 2024-10-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-03-22
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective : the aim of this project is to explore the issues related to the usefulness and acceptability of a digital platform shared between children, their families and the professionals working with the children (rehabilitation, education, leisure) for monitoring children's health, to identify needs and preoccupations from the perspectives of the futur users, to inform the development of a digital application, named Deneo Kid.
Methodology: a qualitative study will be conducted. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with professionals from the rehabilitation, education, social and leisure sectors in France, as well as decision-makers (healthcare executives, facility directors), and disabled children aged 11 to 25, to explore the opportunities, needs and concerns of these potential users with regard to this type of digital solution. The interviews will be conducted and recorded on Zoom. Only the audio recording will be kept, transcribed verbatim and then destroyed. At least 30 participants will be included, but it's when saturation is reached that the number of participants to be included will be determined. For the analysis, the 6 phases of a reflexive thematic analysis will be monitored using Nvivo12 software, by three analysts. The final themes will inform the development of a future digital health technology.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Motor REHAbilitation TEChnologies for CHIldren With Disability: A Cross-European Survey
NCT05176522
Impact of the "Kid'EM App" Digital Guidance Tool for Setting Rehabilitation Goals by the Rehabilitation Professional for Children with Chronic Conditions Impacting Physical Health (READ'APP'T)
NCT06475950
Virtual Reality Implantation in Paediatric Rehabilitation (IMPLANT-VR4 CHILD)
NCT06627049
"Healthcare APPlication for Children and Young People With Neuromotor Disabilities": a Digital Tool to Promote Integrated Pediatric Rehabilitation Care for Children and Young People With Disabilities and Their Families: a Mixed-methods Usability-acceptability-impact Study (HAPPY)
NCT07307950
Early Support and Physiotherapy for Children and Their Motor Skills
NCT04523441
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Indeed, it is recognized in the literature that taking into account the needs and expectations of users (families, professionals, children) from the earliest design phases of a digital solution is essential to foster its usability, acceptability and future appropriation by its users. But this is not enough, and the literature shows a high percentage of failure in digital health innovation projects. For a solution to be adopted by its users, it is also essential to take into account the obstacles and brakes to the implementation of this type of solution at different levels (professionals, decision-makers). Indeed, authors have highlighted organizational factors likely to hinder or support the adoption of this type of solution, such as organizational support, or the persuasive strategies and techniques implemented by the organization to encourage the adoption of a solution by the professionals on a team.
Considering these elements, the investigators have chosen to include not only people concerned by the use of the solution, but also people empowered to lead change, i.e. decision-makers in settings welcoming children with chronic health conditions. Decision-makers is defined as those involved in decision-making concerning the implementation of digital solutions in the various structures working for the health of children with chronic health conditions. They may be health managers or senior health managers in hospitals and rehabilitation centers, directors or heads of department in medico-social establishments, or association leaders. This will enable us to work with decision-makers to define appropriate implementation strategies to encourage adoption of the solution in care environments, and thus guarantee the success of the Deneo KID project.
A qualitative focus group study of families of children with chronic illnesses was already carried out in 2022, supported by the Ildys Foundation (PITChREHAB study). Its aim was to explore the needs and expectations of families of children with chronic illnesses with regard to digital solutions to promote the exchange of information related to their child's rehabilitation. This study highlighted multiple opportunities for families, as well as essential functionalities to be included in the future Deneo KID solution from the families' point of view.
The ProChildRehab study is the second stage in the development of the Deneo KID solution. It focuses on the needs of child-facing professionals and decision-makers for a digital solution designed to facilitate the exchange of information about children with disabilities.
The ProChildRehab study is the second stage in the development of the Deneo KID solution. It focuses on the needs of professionals working with children and decision-makers for a digital solution designed to facilitate the exchange of information about children with disabilities.
The ProChildRehab study was approved by the CHU de Brest territory ethics committee on 14/03/2024. Since then, interviews have been carried out with 18 health, education and leisure professionals working with children with disabilities (psychologist, PRM doctor, specialist teacher, AESH, Handisport leader, etc.) and 6 decision-makers (health executive, SESSAD director, Handisport manager, etc.). Further interviews are planned, as data saturation has not yet been reached (there is some redundancy in the answers, but new ideas are still being contributed). Analysis of these interviews is underway (an iterative process in qualitative research, with analysis concurrent with data collection). Initial results suggest that the views of patients concerned by this future digital solution should be taken into account. Indeed, there is no consensus on several points, such as the psychological information that could be shared by the child and his parents with professionals via the platform (e.g. the child's morale), the fact of sharing photos of daily life and therefore quite intimate (e.g. photos of the house), the usefulness of proposing self-rehabilitation exercises to patients via the platform (rehabilitation overload for children vs. ensuring continuity of services), or the perception of what the child's "reality" is (e.g. professionals who ask for more information on the child's reality to better support him/her vs. other professionals who say that this information is confidential). The investigators would therefore like to explore with young people the acceptability of certain features, particularly in terms of the information that is acceptable for them to exchange about their health via this platform. The aim is to question people who could be concerned by the sharing of information through this future solution, i.e. young people with disabilities who are living or have lived through the care of a child with a disability.
These initial data obtained and the need to go out and interview patients corroborate with the literature on the subject, which highlights the gaps between patients' and clinicians' perceptions of their needs and interests with regard to e-health and advocates an "alignment of concerns" on both sides.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
semi-directed interview or focus group
Participants will be recruited using purposive sampling with maximum variation. If they meet the inclusion criteria, they will be invited to take part in an online interview or focus group, lasting between 40 minutes and 1.5 hours. During the Zoom interview or focus group, they will be asked to answer several pre-defined open-ended questions based on an interview grid co-constructed with the co-investigators, including a patient partner and parent partners. They will be asked to answer closed socio-demographic questions at the end of the interview or focus group. The Zoom meeting will be recorded (audio) and then transcribed into anonymized written form.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Speak and understand French
DECISION MAKERS
* Be a professional working in the health or social field and managing or coordinating a team of rehabilitation professionals working in pediatrics (clinical coordinator, health executive, senior health executive, clinical expert, director of a medico-social establishment, etc.), or a leisure structure for children with disabilities, or a crèche for children with disabilities.
* Speak and understand French
PATIENTS
* be between the ages of 11 and 25
* have had a disability as defined by the International Classification of Functioning and Disability (ICF) since childhood
* have undergone or be undergoing paediatric rehabilitation care
* have been followed or be followed by at least 3 different rehabilitation, school or leisure professionals (e.g. private physiotherapist, APA Handisport, specialized school teacher, etc.)
* have good oral communication skills
Exclusion Criteria
11 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Brest
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marietta Kersalé
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU de Brest
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chu Brest
Brest, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kersale M, Hong QN, Richard T, Kandalaft Cabrol C, Guevel A, Fily E, Tisserand G, Brochard S, Pomey MP, Pons C. Perspectives From Multidisciplinary Professionals in France on Shared Patient Portals for Integrated Pediatric Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Oct 10;12:e73068. doi: 10.2196/73068.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
29BRC24.0029 - ProKChildRehab
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.