The PediQUEST Response to Pain Of Children With Neurologic Disability Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT06075797
Last Updated: 2026-01-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-08
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Is the study feasible and acceptable for participants?
* Does PQ-ResPOND have a potential to be effective?
Participants will:
* answer surveys (their parents will) telling us about the child's pain, symptoms, and use of complementary therapies, and about their own psychological distress and satisfaction with care.
* a group will receive the PQ-ResPOND intervention which consists of:
* activating parents and providers by using the PediQUEST system, a web platform that administers surveys and generates feedback reports alerting parents and providers about the child's experience, AND
* responding to child pain or discomfort by incorporating the Response team (members of the hospital's palliative care team) into the child's care to privde a standardized approach to managing recurrent pain.
Researchers will use a comparison (control) group consisting of participants who will answer surveys and receive usual care (no feedback reports or consult with palliative care in this group) to see if a randomized design is feasible.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Personalized Innovative Intervention Pathways to Promote EF in Children With CP
NCT06288971
BeFAST or BeSTRONG: Brain Change After Fun Athletic Sports-skill Training or Brain Change After Strength TRaining Focusing ON Gait
NCT02754128
Repetitive TMS and Occupational Therapy in Children and Young Adults With Chronic Hemiparesis
NCT02057276
Solution Focused Coaching Strategy Within a Paediatric Multidisciplinary Neuromuscular Clinic
NCT02997514
Motor Outcomes to Validate Evaluations in Pediatric FSHD (MOVE Peds)
NCT06847282
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aims are to 1. assess study's feasibility and acceptability by evaluating recruitment (rates and suitability of screening/tracking), adherence to the intervention (by study participants and interventionists), and retention (dropout rates, reasons, and demographics); and, 2. explore potential for intervention's efficacy by estimating effect sizes and variability of the outcomes proposed for the full-scale RCT (child recurrent pain and symptom burden, and parent outcomes) and assessing intervention's acceptability through semi-structured interviews.
Methods: Researchers will conduct a single site Phase II Pilot 2:1 RCT of PQ-ResPOND (intervention, n=30) vs. usual care (control, n=15) in 45 children ≥1 year-old \& AYA with SNI and moderate to severe recurrent pain behaviors. After randomization, participants will answer weekly PQ-ResPOND surveys and monthly outcome surveys over 12 weeks via the PQ App, and a semi-structured exit interview. Intervention: participants assigned to this arm will receive the PQ-ResPOND intervention which combines (i) parent-mediated activation through weekly collection and feedback to parents and clinicians, via our PQ App, of parent reported child pain (Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist-Revised scale (NCCPC-R)) and other symptoms (PediQUEST-Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale adapted for children with SNI), with (ii) PPC team-mediated activation of primary clinicians and parents: through PPC consultation, and (iii) PPC team activation through training in a standardized approach to recurrent pain using the PQ-ResPOND Checklist (adapted by the study's interprofessional expert panel). Usual care: participants in this arm will continue receiving care as usual.
Outcomes: Investigators will use quantitative and qualitative outcomes to study feasibility and acceptability including recruitment and retention rates, intermittent attrition, adherence to intervention delivery by clinicians, and participant and clinician's acceptability of the intervention. To preliminarily estimate effect sizes and variability, the corresponding scores for child's pain and symptom burden, and parent distress and activation measures will be estimated.
Analysis: For feasibility and acceptability quantitative outcomes investigators will use descriptive statistics. Demographics and reasons for attrition will be reported to explore potential for selection bias. A focused thematic analysis will be used to analyze qualitative variables. To estimate effect sizes and variability of trial outcomes, mixed linear regression models will be estimated. A predefined set of progression criteria are in place.
Discussion: Results will inform whether a full-scale Phase III RCT is warranted, and will help with study design and sample size calculation, development of a manual of procedures and fidelity monitoring strategies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PQ-ResPOND (Intervention)
Participants in the intervention arm will (i) answer weekly PQ-ResPOND Surveys over 12 weeks, (ii) receive feedback reports (generated by the PediQUEST system to summarize parents answers), and (iii) engage with the pediatric palliative care (PPC) team.
The interprofessional PPC team will focus on child's recurrent pain and related symptoms using a standardized approach and work on family activation strategies.
PediQUEST ResPOND
PPC teams will have access to feedback reports and the PQ-ResPOND checklist (standardized framework to diagnosis and treatment of recurrent pain behaviors in children with severe neurologic impairment).
Integration of the PPC team into care will be achieved through (i) initial consultation (goals: identify treatment goals, and address recurrent pain), and (ii) follow-up: the team will contact or visit the family in response to feedback reports or for treatment monitoring purposes.
Usual care (Control)
Participants randomized to the control arm will be assigned weekly PQ-ResPOND Surveys up to week 12. Participants in this arm will not have access to the full PediQUEST system, i.e. no reports will be generated. They will not meet the PPC team but can receive regular palliative care consultations following the site's usual referral procedures.
Children in the usual care arm will receive standard care, which at Boston Children's Hospital usually involves several primary clinicians (primarily neurologists or Complex Care Service attending physicians) and access to psychosocial clinician care throughout the illness course. PPC referrals are typically made at the discretion of the primary clinician, often for decision making reasons and/or closer to end-of-life. If a child presents persistent distress, they will be cared through the usual mechanisms. The rationale for collecting weekly surveys is to minimize reporting bias and may increase adherence and retention.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PediQUEST ResPOND
PPC teams will have access to feedback reports and the PQ-ResPOND checklist (standardized framework to diagnosis and treatment of recurrent pain behaviors in children with severe neurologic impairment).
Integration of the PPC team into care will be achieved through (i) initial consultation (goals: identify treatment goals, and address recurrent pain), and (ii) follow-up: the team will contact or visit the family in response to feedback reports or for treatment monitoring purposes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Child participants will be selected from the base population of patients who are:
* ≥ 1 year old,
* receiving routine (ongoing) care at Boston Children's Hospital, AND
* followed by the Neurology, Cerebral Palsy or Complex Care services.
All patients from the base population will be screened to include any patient who:
* has severe neurological impairment, defined as:
* a Central Nervous System disorder resulting in motor and cognitive impairment and an inability to communicate either verbally or through sign language, AND
* has complete caregiver dependency for activities of daily living AND
* date of diagnosis of SNI is ≥ 4 months prior to the date of screening
Exclusion Criteria
* the child,
* is already followed by the palliative care team, OR
* is not expected to survive at least 2 months after enrollment; OR
* does not have "moderate to severe recurrent pain", as measured through the baseline Child Pain Survey (PPP). Specifically, we will exclude participants whose:
* "Good days" AND "Difficult days" PPP scores are \<14, AND
* "Most troublesome pain" PPP score is \<30, AND
* Number of "difficult days" are \<8 in past month, AND
* Number of days with "most troublesome pain" are \<4 in past month; OR • both parents,
* do not have legal guardianship, OR
* are unable to read, write, and speak English OR Spanish
* are unable to understand and complete surveys.
1 Year
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
NIH
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Deakin University
OTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joanne Wolfe, MD, MPH
Physician in Chief, Chair, Department of Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joanne Wolfe, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Deakin University
Burwood, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023p002305
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.