Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
451 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-09-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predictors of Mortality Among Patients With Head Trauma
NCT06922396
Impact of Early Mobilization on SAH Patients Physiological Parameters
NCT06286683
Radiological Changes of Glymphatic-meningeal Lymphatic Drainage System After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
NCT06444438
Osmotic Therapy for Patients With Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
NCT05858060
Study Evaluating the Potential Impact of a Hemorrhagic Risk Stratification Score in Patients With Mild Head Trauma
NCT04993495
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Survivors
Survivors were defined as patients who were still alive after 28 days of admission to the emergency department.
Glasgow coma scale
The levels of response in the components of the Glasgow Coma Scale are 'scored' from 1, for no response, up to normal values of 4 (Eye-opening response) 5 ( Verbal response) and 6 (Motor response) The total Coma Score thus has values between three and 15, three being the worst and 15 being the highest.
Hunt-Hess scale
The Hunt-Hess scale was used to assess SAH severity according to the clinical presentation and the visible neurological deficits. The Grades run from 1 to 5:
* Grade 1: Asymptomatic or minimal headache, slight neck stiffness.
* Grade 2: Moderate to severe headache, and neck stiffness, but no neurological deficit except cranial nerve palsy.
* Grade 3: Drowsiness, confusion, or a mild focal deficit.
* Grade 4: Stupor, moderate to severe hemiparesis, early decerebrate rigidity, and vegetative disturbance.
* Grade 5: Deep coma, decerebrate rigidity, and a moribund appearance.
World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale
The World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale, introduced in 1988, is used to evaluate the clinical severity of patients with SAH. This scale is derived from the GCS score and considers the presence of motor deficits:
* Grade 1: GCS score of 15, no motor deficit
* Grade 2: GCS score of 13 to 14, no motor deficit
* Grade 3: GCS score of 13 to 14, with motor deficit
* Grade 4: GCS score of 7 to 12, with or without motor deficit
* Grade 5: GCS score of 3 to 6, with or without motor deficit
modified Fisher scale
The modified Fisher scale was used to evaluate SAH severity by reference to the extent of hemorrhage as revealed by CT of the brain. Four grades are depending on the degree of bleeding observed:
* Grade 0: No hemorrhage apparent in CT.
* Grade 1: Minimal hemorrhage without intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).
* Grade 2: Thin or diffusely thin (\<1mm) hemorrhage with bilateral IVH.
* Grade 3: Thick (\> 1 mm) hemorrhage without bilateral IVH.
* Grade 4: Thick (\> 1 mm) hemorrhage with bilateral IVH.
VASOGRADE scale
The VASOGRADE scale was established to estimate the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia following SAH. This scale is based on the WFNS and the modified Fisher scales at admission. There are three categories:
* Green: WFNS score of 1 or 2 and modified Fisher scale of 1 or 2.
* Yellow: WFNS score of 1 or 3 and modified Fisher scale of 3 or 4.
* Red: WFNS score of 4 or 5 and any modified Fisher scale score.
Ogilvy and Carter scale
The Ogilvy and Carter scale is a grading system used to predict the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with SAH due to a ruptured aneurysm. The scale considers multiple factors, including age, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, and aneurysm size, with a score assigned to each of these variables:
* Age greater than 50
* Hunt and Hess grade of 4 to 5
* Fisher grade scores of 3 to 4
* Aneurysm size \>10 mm
* An additional point is added for a giant posterior circulation aneurysm (≥25 mm)
Non-survivors
Non-survivors had passed away within 28 days of admission to the emergency department.
Glasgow coma scale
The levels of response in the components of the Glasgow Coma Scale are 'scored' from 1, for no response, up to normal values of 4 (Eye-opening response) 5 ( Verbal response) and 6 (Motor response) The total Coma Score thus has values between three and 15, three being the worst and 15 being the highest.
Hunt-Hess scale
The Hunt-Hess scale was used to assess SAH severity according to the clinical presentation and the visible neurological deficits. The Grades run from 1 to 5:
* Grade 1: Asymptomatic or minimal headache, slight neck stiffness.
* Grade 2: Moderate to severe headache, and neck stiffness, but no neurological deficit except cranial nerve palsy.
* Grade 3: Drowsiness, confusion, or a mild focal deficit.
* Grade 4: Stupor, moderate to severe hemiparesis, early decerebrate rigidity, and vegetative disturbance.
* Grade 5: Deep coma, decerebrate rigidity, and a moribund appearance.
World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale
The World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale, introduced in 1988, is used to evaluate the clinical severity of patients with SAH. This scale is derived from the GCS score and considers the presence of motor deficits:
* Grade 1: GCS score of 15, no motor deficit
* Grade 2: GCS score of 13 to 14, no motor deficit
* Grade 3: GCS score of 13 to 14, with motor deficit
* Grade 4: GCS score of 7 to 12, with or without motor deficit
* Grade 5: GCS score of 3 to 6, with or without motor deficit
modified Fisher scale
The modified Fisher scale was used to evaluate SAH severity by reference to the extent of hemorrhage as revealed by CT of the brain. Four grades are depending on the degree of bleeding observed:
* Grade 0: No hemorrhage apparent in CT.
* Grade 1: Minimal hemorrhage without intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).
* Grade 2: Thin or diffusely thin (\<1mm) hemorrhage with bilateral IVH.
* Grade 3: Thick (\> 1 mm) hemorrhage without bilateral IVH.
* Grade 4: Thick (\> 1 mm) hemorrhage with bilateral IVH.
VASOGRADE scale
The VASOGRADE scale was established to estimate the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia following SAH. This scale is based on the WFNS and the modified Fisher scales at admission. There are three categories:
* Green: WFNS score of 1 or 2 and modified Fisher scale of 1 or 2.
* Yellow: WFNS score of 1 or 3 and modified Fisher scale of 3 or 4.
* Red: WFNS score of 4 or 5 and any modified Fisher scale score.
Ogilvy and Carter scale
The Ogilvy and Carter scale is a grading system used to predict the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with SAH due to a ruptured aneurysm. The scale considers multiple factors, including age, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, and aneurysm size, with a score assigned to each of these variables:
* Age greater than 50
* Hunt and Hess grade of 4 to 5
* Fisher grade scores of 3 to 4
* Aneurysm size \>10 mm
* An additional point is added for a giant posterior circulation aneurysm (≥25 mm)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Glasgow coma scale
The levels of response in the components of the Glasgow Coma Scale are 'scored' from 1, for no response, up to normal values of 4 (Eye-opening response) 5 ( Verbal response) and 6 (Motor response) The total Coma Score thus has values between three and 15, three being the worst and 15 being the highest.
Hunt-Hess scale
The Hunt-Hess scale was used to assess SAH severity according to the clinical presentation and the visible neurological deficits. The Grades run from 1 to 5:
* Grade 1: Asymptomatic or minimal headache, slight neck stiffness.
* Grade 2: Moderate to severe headache, and neck stiffness, but no neurological deficit except cranial nerve palsy.
* Grade 3: Drowsiness, confusion, or a mild focal deficit.
* Grade 4: Stupor, moderate to severe hemiparesis, early decerebrate rigidity, and vegetative disturbance.
* Grade 5: Deep coma, decerebrate rigidity, and a moribund appearance.
World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale
The World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale, introduced in 1988, is used to evaluate the clinical severity of patients with SAH. This scale is derived from the GCS score and considers the presence of motor deficits:
* Grade 1: GCS score of 15, no motor deficit
* Grade 2: GCS score of 13 to 14, no motor deficit
* Grade 3: GCS score of 13 to 14, with motor deficit
* Grade 4: GCS score of 7 to 12, with or without motor deficit
* Grade 5: GCS score of 3 to 6, with or without motor deficit
modified Fisher scale
The modified Fisher scale was used to evaluate SAH severity by reference to the extent of hemorrhage as revealed by CT of the brain. Four grades are depending on the degree of bleeding observed:
* Grade 0: No hemorrhage apparent in CT.
* Grade 1: Minimal hemorrhage without intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).
* Grade 2: Thin or diffusely thin (\<1mm) hemorrhage with bilateral IVH.
* Grade 3: Thick (\> 1 mm) hemorrhage without bilateral IVH.
* Grade 4: Thick (\> 1 mm) hemorrhage with bilateral IVH.
VASOGRADE scale
The VASOGRADE scale was established to estimate the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia following SAH. This scale is based on the WFNS and the modified Fisher scales at admission. There are three categories:
* Green: WFNS score of 1 or 2 and modified Fisher scale of 1 or 2.
* Yellow: WFNS score of 1 or 3 and modified Fisher scale of 3 or 4.
* Red: WFNS score of 4 or 5 and any modified Fisher scale score.
Ogilvy and Carter scale
The Ogilvy and Carter scale is a grading system used to predict the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with SAH due to a ruptured aneurysm. The scale considers multiple factors, including age, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, and aneurysm size, with a score assigned to each of these variables:
* Age greater than 50
* Hunt and Hess grade of 4 to 5
* Fisher grade scores of 3 to 4
* Aneurysm size \>10 mm
* An additional point is added for a giant posterior circulation aneurysm (≥25 mm)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with missing information
* patients with traumatic SAH
* patients with subdural or epidural hemorrhage
* patients with concurrent ischemic stroke
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adem Az
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adem Az, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sharma D. Perioperative Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Anesthesiology. 2020 Dec 1;133(6):1283-1305. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003558.
Hijdra A, van Gijn J, Nagelkerke NJ, Vermeulen M, van Crevel H. Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia, rebleeding, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1988 Oct;19(10):1250-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.10.1250.
Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care. 2005;2(2):110-8. doi: 10.1385/NCC:2:2:110.
Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1998 May;42(5):959-68; discussion 968-70. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199805000-00001.
Takagi K, Tamura A, Nakagomi T, Nakayama H, Gotoh O, Kawai K, Taneda M, Yasui N, Hadeishi H, Sano K. How should a subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale be determined? A combinatorial approach based solely on the Glasgow Coma Scale. J Neurosurg. 1999 Apr;90(4):680-7. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0680.
Dengler NF, Sommerfeld J, Diesing D, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S. Prediction of cerebral infarction and patient outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of new and established radiographic, clinical and combined scores. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Jan;25(1):111-119. doi: 10.1111/ene.13471. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
38-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.