The Outcome of Injured Cervical Spinal Cord with Uncontrolled Swelling Under Duraplasty
NCT ID: NCT06552507
Last Updated: 2025-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
104 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-01
2026-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Rationale for Research:
In a systematic review, individuals suffering from cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries (TSCIs) identified specific priorities for improvement in their quality of life. These priorities encompassed enhanced arm and hand function, improved bladder and bowel control, sexual function, and the nurturing of personal relationships with their families and friends.
In this context, the investigators posit that augmenting standard treatment with expansion duraplasty has the potential to address several critical aspects of TSCI. Our hypothesis centers on the idea that the incorporation of duraplasty into the treatment regimen can lead to a reduction in spinal cord compression, an enhancement in Spinal Cord Perfusion Pressure (SCPP), an amelioration in spinal cord metabolism, and a mitigation of inflammation at the injury site. The investigatorsanticipate that these physiological and metabolic enhancements will contribute to increased neuronal survival, ultimately resulting in improved motor outcomes. These improved motor outcomes, in turn, are expected to translate into enhanced limb function, superior bladder and bowel control, and an overall improvement in the quality of life for the patients.
Our investigative focus encompasses a comprehensive examination of the impact of duraplasty on various facets of spinal cord physiology, metabolism, inflammation, motor and sensory performance, and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measures. These HRQoL measures encompass aspects such as hand function, ambulation, bladder and bowel function, as well as the mental, emotional, and social well-being of the patients.
In the north area of R.O.C, individuals with TSCI are initially admitted to Linkou Chang Guan Memorial Hospital, where they typically undergo surgery involving spinal instrumentation (e.g., screws and rods) to address deformities and instability. Bony decompression, typically carried out through laminectomy, is a common surgical intervention aimed at addressing the adverse effects of bony compression on the spinal cord. It is worth noting that a significant majority of surgeons (ranging from 85% to 96%) advocate for bony decompression as a primary treatment for TSCI, as recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines in 2016. However, the effectiveness of bony decompression in improving outcomes following TSCI remains a topic of debate and uncertainty, largely due to the absence of robust evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Our proposal suggests that bony decompression in isolation may offer only partial relief to the swollen and injured spinal cord, which continues to experience compression against the dura. This may explain the persisting uncertainty surrounding the benefits of bony decompression in TSCI treatment. Achieving adequate cord decompression through surgical intervention assumes particular importance in this context, given the lack of pharmaceutical treatments proven to enhance outcomes in individuals with acute and severe TSCI. While the administration of methylprednisolone initially showed promise, subsequent trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses have cast doubt on its efficacy and raised concerns about potential harm.
The management of TSCI in the R.O.C is characterized by considerable variation among major trauma centers, encompassing diverse practices related to factors such as target blood pressure, choice of anesthetic agents, extent of monitoring (including the use of arterial and central lines), and timing of surgery. To circumvent these controversies and differences in practice, the "The outcome of Injured cervical Spinal Cord with Uncontrolled Swelling under Duraplasty" trial has been meticulously designed in a single major trauma center to allow participating surgeon can follow the same protocol about time to surgery and medically management.
The "The outcome of Injured cervical Spinal Cord with Uncontrolled Swelling under Duraplasty" trial was conceived with the aim of addressing these critical questions surrounding TSCI management, ultimately seeking to improve the outcomes and quality of life for individuals grappling with this challenging condition.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of Korean Society of Spine Surgery on the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
NCT01911013
Clinical Trial of Remote Preconditioning in Patients Undergoing Cervical Decompression Surgery
NCT00778323
Functional Outcome After Combined Posterior Laminectomy and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Large Cervical Disc Prolapse
NCT06847503
Functional Outcome After Surgery for Cervical Disc Prolapse
NCT06857643
Platysma Incision Cosmesis
NCT03338608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Laminectomy with Duroplasty
Duroplasty
Duroplasty
The investigators open the dura from midline and repaired with fish mouth for dura augmentation
Laminectomy only
laminectomy without duroplasty
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Duroplasty
The investigators open the dura from midline and repaired with fish mouth for dura augmentation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Severe cervical (C2 - T1) traumatic spinal cord injury (AIS grade A-C)
* Deemed to require and be suitable for surgery that includes laminectomy or diskectomy by local surgeon
* Surgery within 72 hours of traumatic spinal cord injury
* Able to provide informed consent or consultee declaration or proxy consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Thoracic or lumbar traumatic spinal cord injury
* Probable dural tear due to injury
* Other central nervous system disease
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Daalen Wetters T, Coffino P. Cultured S49 mouse T lymphoma cells. Methods Enzymol. 1987;151:9-19. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(87)51005-9. No abstract available.
Farmer C, Fenu E, O'Flynn N, Guthrie B. Clinical assessment and management of multimorbidity: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2016 Sep 21;354:i4843. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4843. No abstract available.
Liu J, Liu P, Ma Z, Mou J, Wang Z, Sun D, Cheng J, Zhang D, Xiao J. The effects of aging on the profile of the cervical spine. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14425. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014425.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2312250059
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.