Online Psychotherapy for Emotional Reasoning Bias in Public Speaking Anxiety
NCT ID: NCT06552273
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
158 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-01
2025-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multisite Virtual Reality Intervention for Speech Anxiety
NCT06593847
Evaluation of Physiological and Vocal Parameters in Volunteers of Both Genders Submitted to an Anxiogenic Task
NCT01157273
Speech Treatment for Minimally Verbal Children With ASD and CAS
NCT05066178
Effects of Emotional Processes on Speech Motor Control in Early Childhood Stuttering.
NCT05003583
Assessing Perceptual Effects of Interactive Tasks
NCT06828523
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To evaluate the effects of this intervention, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted, comparing two arms, an experimental group to which the bias correction training will be applied and a control group, to which a non-specific intervention will be used. A total of 158 participants based on calculations with the G\*Power program will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (N=79) and a control group (N=79). Bias correction training consists of 12 daily self-applied sessions in which components such as psychoeducation in emotions and the detection of ER biases and their impact on behavior are targeted. The primary outcome measure will be Emotional reasoning bias severity and symptomatology associated with public speaking anxiety. Secondary outcome measures will be the severity of depressive and anxious symptomatology, quality of life, usability, and perceived acceptance of participants.
Individuals will be assessed thrice: at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up.
Data will be analyzed both per protocol and intention-to-treat. This study will pioneer this type of intervention by bringing together an underdeveloped concept with implementing new technologies. It is intended to increase our knowledge about treatments administered through the Internet and will contribute to improving the dissemination of treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Emotional Reasoning bias correction training
The experimental arm will receive an Emotional Reasoning bias correction training. The training consists of 12 self-administrated sessions, delivered online.
Emotional Reasoning bias correction training
Emotional Reasoning Bias correction training involves 12 daily self-applied sessions focusing on psychoeducation about emotions and identifying ER biases and their impact on behaviour.
Intervention based on mindfulness
The control group refers to an intervention based on mindfulness skills. This treatment is part of a Transdiagnostic treatment developed in our laboratory, for the treatment of patients with emotional disorders (Díaz-García et al., 2017).
Module of Mindfulness of the Transdiagnostic treatment
Module based on mindfulness using techniques for training in awareness and acceptance of experiences, observing experiences as they arise without judgment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Emotional Reasoning bias correction training
Emotional Reasoning Bias correction training involves 12 daily self-applied sessions focusing on psychoeducation about emotions and identifying ER biases and their impact on behaviour.
Module of Mindfulness of the Transdiagnostic treatment
Module based on mindfulness using techniques for training in awareness and acceptance of experiences, observing experiences as they arise without judgment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Accept the informed consent.
3. Adequately understand/read Spanish.
4. Have access to a mobile device or computer with an Internet connection.
5. Not receiving any other psychological treatment for public speaking anxiety during the study period.
6. Have a score of 43 or higher on the Emotional reasoning scale (ERPSAS) AND a score of 55 or higher on the Spanish version of the Public Speaking Anxiety Scale (PSAS-S) for fear of public speaking.
7. If taking prescribed medication for anxiety/depression, have had no changes in dosage for at least one month before the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Being a minor.
3. Having a severe mental disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other psychotic disorders) or substance abuse (alcohol or other substances) or having active suicidal plans (suicide item in the ODSIS depression questionnaire ≥ 2) that would prevent participation in the program.
4. In the case of receiving medication, changes in medication during treatment will be evaluated but will not lead to exclusion.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitat Jaume I
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Macarena Paredes Mealla
PhD Student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Macarena Paredes Mealla, PhD Student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitat Jaume I
Carlos Suso Ribera, Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universitat Jaume I
Azucena García Palacios, Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universitat Jaume I
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Diaz-Garcia A, Gonzalez-Robles A, Fernandez-Alvarez J, Garcia-Palacios A, Banos RM, Botella C. Efficacy of a Transdiagnostic internet-based treatment for emotional disorders with a specific component to address positive affect: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1297-z.
Paredes-Mealla M, Martinez-Borba V, Miragall M, Garcia-Palacios A, Banos RM, Suso-Ribera C. Is there evidence that emotional reasoning processing underlies emotional disorders in adults? A systematic review. Curr Psychol. 2022 Nov 9:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03884-4. Online ahead of print.
Arntz A, Rauner M, van den Hout M. "If I feel anxious, there must be danger": ex-consequentia reasoning in inferring danger in anxiety disorders. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Nov;33(8):917-25. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00032-s.
Lommen MJ, Engelhard IM, van den Hout MA, Arntz A. Reducing emotional reasoning: an experimental manipulation in individuals with fear of spiders. Cogn Emot. 2013;27(8):1504-12. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.795482. Epub 2013 May 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEISH/86/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.