Safe and Fast Radial Hemostasis Using Synergistic Strategies: SAFE & FAST Trial

NCT ID: NCT06549842

Last Updated: 2026-01-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

450 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-15

Study Completion Date

2026-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Safe and Fast Radial Hemostasis using Synergistic Strategies (SAFE \& FAST) trial is an interventional study aimed at reducing the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO) rebound bleeding, and the required compression time after transradial approach (TRA) procedures, which have become the default access for coronary procedures globally. The hypothesis is that combining lower-dose heparin and radial hemostasis with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression could achieve these improved outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients referred for diagnostic trans-radial cardiac catheterization who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized into two groups. Group 1 will receive a standard heparin dose (50 U/Kg) with a total compression time of 2 hours using the TR band ® . Group 2 will receive a reduced heparin dose (25 U/Kg) and a compression time of 60 minutes using the VASOBand™, with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression.

The study's primary endpoint is a composite of rebound bleeding, post-procedural RAO, and hematoma formation. Radial artery patency will be evaluated using ultrasonography.

With an expected complication rate of 8.2% in Group 1 and 4.5% in Group 2, a sample size of 207 patients per group will provide an 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority for the treatment group at the alpha 2.5% level. The statistical analysis plan will use descriptive statistics for baseline data and 95% confidence intervals for outcome variables. If non-inferiority is demonstrated, there will be a superiority test performed to examine if Group 2 is superior.

In conclusion, the SAFE \& FAST trial intends to establish a safer, quicker protocol for hemostasis after TRA procedures, with the potential to reduce patient recovery time and improve procedure throughput in cardiac catheterization laboratories.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases Bleeding Arterial Puncture Catheter Complications Occlusion of Artery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1-Regular dose heparin

Patients in this arm will be labeled as Group 1. Patients will receive a standard heparin dose (50U/Kg) with a total compression time of 2 hours using the TR band ®.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Heparin

Intervention Type DRUG

The intervention for this study is the dose of heparin. Patients randomized to group 1 will receive a heparin dose of 50U/kg and those in group 2 will receive a lower dose of heparin at 25U/kg. Recovery period for group 1 would be 2 hours whereas for group 2 would be 1 hour.

Terumo Radial Band

Intervention Type DEVICE

Group 1 will receive TR band post cardiac catheterization for radial hemostasis.

Group 2-Low dose heparin

Patients in this arm will be labeled as Group 2. Patients will receive a reduced heparin dose (25 U/Kg) and a compression time of 60 minutes using the VASOBand™, with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Heparin

Intervention Type DRUG

The intervention for this study is the dose of heparin. Patients randomized to group 1 will receive a heparin dose of 50U/kg and those in group 2 will receive a lower dose of heparin at 25U/kg. Recovery period for group 1 would be 2 hours whereas for group 2 would be 1 hour.

Vaosband

Intervention Type DEVICE

Group 2 will receive Vasoband post cardiac catheterization for radial hemostasis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Heparin

The intervention for this study is the dose of heparin. Patients randomized to group 1 will receive a heparin dose of 50U/kg and those in group 2 will receive a lower dose of heparin at 25U/kg. Recovery period for group 1 would be 2 hours whereas for group 2 would be 1 hour.

Intervention Type DRUG

Terumo Radial Band

Group 1 will receive TR band post cardiac catheterization for radial hemostasis.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vaosband

Group 2 will receive Vasoband post cardiac catheterization for radial hemostasis.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TR Band Radial artery compression device

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients referred for diagnostic transradial cardiac catheterization
2. Age ≥ 18 years
3. Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Absence of written informed consent
2. Patients on long-term systemic anticoagulation therapy for a different indication
3. Patients requiring a heparin dose of greater than 50 units per kilogram before, during, or after the procedure for any reason.
4. Patients requiring greater than 6 French catheter access
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Regional Hospital of Scranton

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nishant Sethi

Interventional Cardiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nishant Sethi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Regional Hospital of Scranton

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regional Hospital of Scranton

Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Apex Heart Institute

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Khyati Khattar, MD

Role: CONTACT

5702092088

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Khyati Khattar, MD

Role: primary

5702092088

Anurag Barot, MBBS

Role: primary

919426662412

Khyati Khattar, MBBS

Role: backup

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859386/

Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199902)46:2%3C173::AID-CCD12%3E3.0.CO;2-4

Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention

http://www.ajconline.org/article/S0002-9149(11)00469-3/abstract

Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30391389/

Multicenter Randomized Evaluation of High Versus Standard Heparin Dose on Incident Radial Arterial Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Angiography: The SPIRIT OF ARTEMIS Study

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.21900

Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP)

http://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/JAHA.116.005029?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org

Randomized Trial of Compression Duration After Transradial Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20807305/

Randomized clinical trial on short-time compression with Kaolin-filled pad: a new strategy to avoid early bleeding and subacute radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary intervention

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22230148/

The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.21058

Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization

https://www.proquest.com/docview/1504614575?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals

Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of bleeding after transradial coronary stenting and maximal antiplatelet therapy

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32961529/

Randomized COmparison of Isolated Radial Artery ComPrEssioN Versus Radial and Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression in Achieving Radial Artery Patency: The OPEN-Radial Trial

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1378751

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.