The Clinical Utility of Thrombelastography in Guiding Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism Following Trauma
NCT ID: NCT01050153
Last Updated: 2019-01-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Usually, patients in the SICU at Denver Health who are at risk for blood clots receive preventative treatment with a FDA-approved medicine called Fragmin. Fragmin is intended to prevent blood clots from forming but, with the way it is generally used, some patients may still develop blood clots. All patients treated with Fragmin to prevent blood clots at Denver Health, currently receive the same Fragmin dose. This treatment is called the "standard of care".
So far, in the US, there has not been a commonly available test that can tell us:
* if the standard dose of Fragmin is enough to prevent blood clots for everyone, or
* if different patients need different doses, or
* if other blood clot preventing medicines, that work in a different way, should be used in addition to Fragmin.
The ability of your blood to clot and the strength of the clot formed can be described by a FDA-approved blood test called thrombelastography, referred to as TEG. TEG may provide us with answers to each of the questions above. Our preliminary data indicate that it is helpful in assessing both clotting and bleeding tendencies and may prove useful in guiding treatment for the prevention of blood clots.
The aim of this study is to determine if a treatment plan using Fragmin, and, if indicated, one or two additional FDA-approved medicines called anti-platelet drugs, guided by the results of TEG testing, may be better at preventing blood clots than our current standard of care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Upper Extremity Deep-Vein Thrombosis
NCT00245856
Dalteparin vs Unfractionated Heparin For The Prevention Of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) In Hospitalized Acutely Ill Medical Patients
NCT00445328
An Observational Study On The Safety And Tolerability Of Prolonged Thrombosis Prophylaxis With Fragmin®
NCT01046903
Fragmin for the Treatment of Acute VTE in Pediatric Cancer Patients
NCT00952380
Epidemiology of Thromboembolism Disease: A Cohort Study
NCT00670540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Approximately 50 trauma patients for whom prevention of VTE with LMWH is indicated, will be enrolled over a six month period.
The specific aims of this study are as follows:
1. To determine the incidence of, and to characterize, hypercoagulability using TEG and conventional clinical coagulation testing (APTT, INR), Antithrombin III levels and Protein C activity.
2. In the group of patients receiving LMWH (Fragmin) therapy alone for prevention of VTE:
1. to assess the anticoagulant effect of standard LMWH (Fragmin) dosing (5000IU subcutaneously once daily) using TEG and Anti-Factor Xa level measurement, and
2. to determine the extent of correlation of relevant TEG parameters with measured Anti-Factor Xa levels (U/ml).
3. To assess whether TEG is a useful clinical tool for monitoring and optimizing prophylactic LMWH (Fragmin) therapy and for identifying the need for anti-platelet therapy to minimize the risk of VTE in these patients.
4. To evaluate the clinical utility of platelet mapping for guiding anti-platelet therapy in those patients for whom it is indicated by TEG results.
5. To determine the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in each randomized group and in the subgroup receiving anti-platelet therapy in addition to LMWH (Fragmin) for prevention of VTE.
The overall aim is to utilize the above data to evaluate a) the adequacy of our standard Fragmin dosing regimen (5000IU subcutaneously once daily) alone for prevention of VTE in our trauma/SICU patients, b) the need for anti-platelet agents in addition to LMWH (Fragmin) for prevention of VTE in our population, and c) to validate/further develop the TEG-guided algorithm for optimal prophylaxis of VTE using LMWH (Fragmin) plus/minus anti-platelet therapy guided by platelet mapping.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control (standard of care)
Dalteparin sodium 5000IU subcutaneously daily
Dalteparin sodium
Dalteparin sodium injection 5000IU subcutaneously daily until fully ambulatory
TEG-guided thromboprophylaxis
Dalteparin sodium plus/minus anti-platelet medication (aspirin) per a TEG-guided algorithm
Dalteparin sodium/aspirin
Dalteparin sodium (2500-10,000IU sc daily), aspirin (81-325mg daily) po.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dalteparin sodium
Dalteparin sodium injection 5000IU subcutaneously daily until fully ambulatory
Dalteparin sodium/aspirin
Dalteparin sodium (2500-10,000IU sc daily), aspirin (81-325mg daily) po.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* blunt or penetrating trauma requiring admission to the SICU
* requirement for LMWH (Fragmin) therapy for prophylaxis of VTE as standard of care, and
* informed consent by patient, legally authorized representative or proxy decision maker (if patient incompetent to provide) obtained and documented.
Exclusion Criteria
* known hypersensitivity to dalteparin sodium,
* known hypersensitivity to heparin or pork products,
* thrombocytopenia associated with positive tests for antiplatelet antibody in the presence of Fragmin,
* history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT),
* chronic liver disease (bilirubin \>2 mg/dl) or kidney insufficiency (CrCl \<30mL/min),
* intravascular thrombolytic therapy within 24 hours,
* resuscitation that required massive transfusion (\>10 units RBC within 6 hours),
* ongoing resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock,
* known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy (INR \>2 not on warfarin),
* thrombocytopenia (platelets \<20K/uL),
* subdural or epidural hematoma.
Or
Presence of any of the following relative contraindications to LMWH (Fragmin) therapy:
* new intracranial lesions, neoplasms or monitoring devices,
* extravascular thrombolytic therapy,
* severe uncontrolled hypertension,
* arterial dissection
* recent (within 12 hours) intraocular surgery (prior or planned),
* recent (within 72 hours) intracranial or spine surgery (prior or planned),
* conditions associated with increased risk of hemorrhage, e.g. active gastrointestinal ulceration, angiodysplastic disease, gastrointestinal bleeding within the past six months, bacterial endocarditis, history of hemorrhagic stroke, diabetic retinopathy.
Or
Presence, or removal within the last 12 hours, of an indwelling epidural or spinal catheter, OR recent (within the last 12 hours) or planned neuraxial (spinal/epidural) anesthesia or spinal puncture.
Or
Per history taken from patient or family, concomitant or known use within one week prior to hospitalization, of drugs affecting hemostasis such as NSAIDS, platelet inhibitors or other anticoagulants, except as specified in this protocol.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eisai Inc.
INDUSTRY
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ernest E. Moore, MD
Chief, Department of Surgery and Trauma Services Rocky Mountain Regional Trauma Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ernest E. Moore Jr, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chief, Department of Surgery and Trauma Services , Denver Health Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Denver Health Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COMIRB # 09-0753
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.