PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT)

NCT ID: NCT00182143

Last Updated: 2011-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

3659 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-05-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PROTECT: The PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial.

Background: Critically ill patients have an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) due to their acute illness, procedures such as central venous catheterization, and immobility. Among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), DVT is an important problem, since thrombus propagation and embolization can lead to potentially fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). Only 1 randomized trial (n=119) in medical-surgical ICU patients demonstrates that unfractionated heparin (UFH) prevents DVT compared to no prophylaxis; only 1 randomized trial (n=223) in ventilated COPD patients shows that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prevents DVT compared to no prophylaxis. In medical-surgical ICUs, the effect of LMWH vs UFH for DVT prevention has not been tested. On one hand, LMWH is likely to be more effective at venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention and is associated with a lower rate of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). On the other hand, UFH is likely associated with less bleeding, and is less expensive. Current guidelines indicate that in the absence of comparative data, both LMWH and UFH are suitable for thromboprophylaxis in this population, but that a randomized trial is needed.

PROTECT Pilot: In our Pilot Study, feasibility objectives were to assess:

1\) timely enrolment and complete, blinded study drug administration, 2) the bioaccumulation of LMWH in patients with acquired renal insufficiency, 3) twice weekly leg ultrasounds, and 4) recruitment rates.

1. Timely, complete administration occurred for 98% of scheduled doses; every dose was blinded.
2. No LWMH bioaccumulation was observed.
3. Scheduled ultrasounds occurred without exception.
4. Recruitment will be 4 patients/month/centre after modification of 3 exclusion criteria in the PROTECT pilot.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of LMWH (dalteparin) vs UFH on the primary outcome of proximal leg DVT diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of PE, bleeding, HIT, and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.

Design: Prospective randomized stratified concealed blinded multicentre trial.

Population: Inclusion Criteria: Eligible patients in medical-surgical ICUs will be \>18 years old, weigh \> 45 kg, and have an expected ICU stay \> 72 hours.

Exclusion Criteria: Patients admitted to ICU post trauma, orthopedic surgery, or neurosurgery, with severe hypertension, DVT, PE or major hemorrhage within 3 months, International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 2 ULN, Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) \> 2 ULN, platelets \< 75 x 109/L, or those requiring therapeutic anticoagulation will be excluded. Patients with a contraindication to heparin, blood products or pork products, with \> 3 days of LMWH or UFH in ICU, patients who are pregnant, undergoing withdrawal of life support, or are enrolled in this or a related trial will also be excluded.

Methods: Using centralized telephone randomization, we will allocate 3,650 patients in 40 centres to LMWH (dalteparin) 5,000 IU daily or UFH 5,000 IU twice daily SC for the duration of ICU stay. Patients, families, all clinicians and researcher will be blinded; only the pharmacist will be aware of allocation. Bilateral proximal leg compression ultrasounds will be performed within 48h of ICU admission, twice weekly, and on suspicion of DVT. PE will be diagnosed by a predefined diagnostic algorithm. We will record bleeding, HIT, other venous thrombosis and complications. Protocol adherence will be maximized using training, manuals, study aids, site visits, audit and feedback. Blinded Adjudication Committees will adjudicate endpoints. PROTECT will be conducted by the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and overseen by an independent DSMB.

Relevance: The results of PROTECT will be used to develop evidence based practice guidelines regarding the safety and efficacy of LMWH (dalteparin) vs UFH for thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical ICU patients around the world.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Deep Venous Thrombosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LMWH (Fragmin, dalteparin)

Placebo dose (normal saline) = AM dose LMWH (Fragmin, dalteparin) 5000IU daily = PM dose

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LMWH (Fragmin, dalteparin)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo AM dose (normal saline) and LMWH (Fragmin, dalteparin) 5000IU PM dose

2

Unfractionated Heparin 5000IU BID

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Unfractionated Heparin

Intervention Type DRUG

5000 IU BID

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LMWH (Fragmin, dalteparin)

Placebo AM dose (normal saline) and LMWH (Fragmin, dalteparin) 5000IU PM dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Unfractionated Heparin

5000 IU BID

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fragmin Heparin Sodium

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is \>/= 18 years of age
2. Actual body weight is \>/= 45 kg
3. Admission to ICU expected to be \>/= 72 hours in duration

Exclusion Criteria

1. Neurosurgery within last 3 months
2. Ischemic stroke within last 3 months
3. Intracranial hemorrhage within last 3 months
4. Systolic Blood Pressure \>/= 180mm Hg, Diastolic Blood Pressure \>/= 110mm Hg for \>/= 12 hours requiring vasoactive drug infusion
5. Major hemorrhage within last week unless definitively treated
6. Coagulopathy as defined by INR \>/= 2 times upper limit of normal \[ULN\], or PTT \>/= 2 times ULN, at time of screening
7. Thrombocytopenia defined as platelet count \</= 75 x 109/L, at time of screening
8. Other heparin contraindications (e.g., HIT, pregnancy, lactating)
9. Contraindication to blood products (e.g., Jehovah's Witness)
10. Unable to perform lower limb ultrasound (e.g., bilateral above the knee amputation, or severe distal extremity burns)
11. Limitation of life support, Life expectancy \</= 14 days, or palliative care
12. Contamination (e.g., \>/= 3 doses of LMWH during this ICU admission)
13. Lack of informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

McMaster University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deborah J Cook, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Blacktown Hospital

Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St. John's Mercy Medical Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Nepean Hospital

Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Wollongong Hospital

Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Lyell McEwin Hospital

Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Flinders Hospital

Bedford Park, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Bendigo Health Care

Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Box Hill Hospital

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Monash Medical Center

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Dandenong Hospital

Dandenong, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Frankston Hospital

Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

The Geelong Hospital

Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Austin Hill Hospital

Heidelburg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Royal Melbourne Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

The Alfred Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Royal North Shore Hospital

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

UTI da Enfermaria de Clinical Medica do Hospital

São Paulo, Brazil, Brazil

Site Status

Hospitalar Santa Casa

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Moinhos de Vento

Porto Alegre, Rs Cep, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital ProCardiaco

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Coracao

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Foothills Hospital

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

The Peter Lougheed Hospital

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Royal Alexandra Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Surry Memorial

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Royal Columbian Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver Island Health Authority

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. Boniface Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II Health

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Guelph General Hospital

Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health Science Centre - Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health Science Centre - McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St Joseph's HealthCare

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health Science Center - Henderson Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Grand River Hospital

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Science Center

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Lakeridge Health

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital - General Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital - Civic Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Science Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St Michaels Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Sacre Couer

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Charles LeMoyne

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Maisonneuve

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Affilie-Enfant Jesus

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Laval

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke University (CHUS) Hospital

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

King Abdulaziz Medical City Hospital

Riyadh, Riyahd, Saudi Arabia

Site Status

King Abdulaziz University Hospital

Jeddah, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

King Faisal Specialist & Research Center

Jeddah, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

King Fahad Medical City

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Riyadh Military Hospital

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Guys and St Thomas Hospital

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Brazil Canada Saudi Arabia United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Li G, Cook DJ, Thabane L, Friedrich JO, Crozier TM, Muscedere J, Granton J, Mehta S, Reynolds SC, Lopes RD, Lauzier F, Freitag AP, Levine MA; PROTECT Investigators for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Risk factors for mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units with pneumonia. Respir Res. 2016 Jul 11;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0397-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27401184 (View on PubMed)

Li G, Thabane L, Cook DJ, Lopes RD, Marshall JC, Guyatt G, Holbrook A, Akhtar-Danesh N, Fowler RA, Adhikari NKJ, Taylor R, Arabi YM, Chittock D, Dodek P, Freitag AP, Walter SD, Heels-Ansdell D, Levine MAH. Risk factors for and prediction of mortality in critically ill medical-surgical patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0116-x. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26921148 (View on PubMed)

Li G, Cook DJ, Levine MAH, Guyatt G, Crowther M, Heels-Ansdell D, Holbrook A, Lamontagne F, Walter SD, Ferguson ND, Finfer S, Arabi YM, Bellomo R, Cooper DJ, Thabane L; PROTECT Investigators for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Competing Risk Analysis for Evaluation of Dalteparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism in Medical-Surgical Critically Ill Patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(36):e1479. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001479.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26356708 (View on PubMed)

Fowler RA, Mittmann N, Geerts WH, Heels-Ansdell D, Gould MK, Guyatt G, Krahn M, Finfer S, Pinto R, Chan B, Ormanidhi O, Arabi Y, Qushmaq I, Rocha MG, Dodek P, McIntyre L, Hall R, Ferguson ND, Mehta S, Marshall JC, Doig CJ, Muscedere J, Jacka MJ, Klinger JR, Vlahakis N, Orford N, Seppelt I, Skrobik YK, Sud S, Cade JF, Cooper J, Cook D; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Economic evaluation of the prophylaxis for thromboembolism in critical care trial (E-PROTECT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:502. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-502.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25528663 (View on PubMed)

Crowther M, Cook D, Guyatt G, Zytaruk N, McDonald E, Williamson D, Albert M, Dodek P, Finfer S, Vallance S, Heels-Ansdell D, McIntyre L, Mehta S, Lamontagne F, Muscedere J, Jacka M, Lesur O, Kutsiogiannis J, Friedrich J, Klinger JR, Qushmaq I, Burry L, Khwaja K, Sheppard JA, Warkentin TE; PROTECT collaborators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the critically ill: interpreting the 4Ts test in a randomized trial. J Crit Care. 2014 Jun;29(3):470.e7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24726205 (View on PubMed)

Lamontagne F, McIntyre L, Dodek P, Heels-Ansdell D, Meade M, Pemberton J, Skrobik Y, Seppelt I, Vlahakis NE, Muscedere J, Reece G, Ostermann M, Padayachee S, Alhashemi J, Walsh M, Lewis B, Schiff D, Moody A, Zytaruk N, Leblanc M, Cook DJ; Prophylaxis for Thromboembolism in Critical Care Trial Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Nonleg venous thrombosis in critically ill adults: a nested prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):689-96. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.169.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24638843 (View on PubMed)

Lauzier F, Arnold DM, Rabbat C, Heels-Ansdell D, Zarychanski R, Dodek P, Ashley BJ, Albert M, Khwaja K, Ostermann M, Skrobik Y, Fowler R, McIntyre L, Nates JL, Karachi T, Lopes RD, Zytaruk N, Finfer S, Crowther M, Cook D. Risk factors and impact of major bleeding in critically ill patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Dec;39(12):2135-43. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3044-3. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23942857 (View on PubMed)

Smith OM, McDonald E, Zytaruk N, Foster D, Matte A, Clarke F, Fleury S, Krause K, McArdle T, Skrobik Y, Cook DJ. Enhancing the informed consent process for critical care research: strategies from a thromboprophylaxis trial. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Dec;29(6):300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23871290 (View on PubMed)

Williamson DR, Albert M, Heels-Ansdell D, Arnold DM, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, Crowther M, Warkentin TE, Dodek P, Cade J, Lesur O, Lim W, Fowler R, Lamontagne F, Langevin S, Freitag A, Muscedere J, Friedrich JO, Geerts W, Burry L, Alhashemi J, Cook D; PROTECT collaborators, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients receiving thromboprophylaxis: frequency, risk factors, and outcomes. Chest. 2013 Oct;144(4):1207-1215. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0121.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23788287 (View on PubMed)

Smith OM, McDonald E, Zytaruk N, Foster D, Matte A, Clarke F, Meade L, O'Callaghan N, Vallance S, Galt P, Rajbhandari D, Rocha M, Mehta S, Ferguson ND, Hall R, Fowler R, Burns K, Qushmaq I, Ostermann M, Heels-Ansdell D, Cook D; PROTECT Research Coordinators; PROTECT Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Australian, New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Rates and determinants of informed consent: a case study of an international thromboprophylaxis trial. J Crit Care. 2013 Feb;28(1):28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23089679 (View on PubMed)

Cook D, Meade M, Guyatt G, Walter SD, Heels-Ansdell D, Geerts W, Warkentin TE, Cooper DJ, Zytaruk N, Vallance S, Berwanger O, Rocha M, Qushmaq I, Crowther M. PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial protocol and analysis plan. J Crit Care. 2011 Apr;26(2):223.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.02.010.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21482348 (View on PubMed)

PROTECT Investigators for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group; Cook D, Meade M, Guyatt G, Walter S, Heels-Ansdell D, Warkentin TE, Zytaruk N, Crowther M, Geerts W, Cooper DJ, Vallance S, Qushmaq I, Rocha M, Berwanger O, Vlahakis NE. Dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1305-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014475. Epub 2011 Mar 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21417952 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ISRCTN54618366

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.