Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis After Trauma: Three Times a Day Unfractionated Heparin Versus Twice a Day Enoxaparin

NCT ID: NCT01729559

Last Updated: 2016-07-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

495 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The rate of venous thromboembolic events in trauma patients at high risk for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism receiving low dose unfractionated heparin every 8 hours will be equivalent or less than a similar group of patients given a standard every 12 hour dose of low molecular weight heparin.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life threatening complication of major trauma. The risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following major trauma exceeds 50% unless adequate chemoprophylaxis is used. Recent national quality improvement initiatives, such as the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), mandate the risk stratification of hospitalized patients and the use of VTE prophylaxis based on the risk assessment. Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH, enoxaparin) and Low Dose Unfractionated Heparin (LDUH) are commonly used alternatives for VTE chemoprophylaxis following major trauma. LMWH became favored in most trauma centers following a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the two agents that demonstrated superior efficacy and equivalent safety of LMWH over a twice per day dosing of LDUH. The results of this study were largely responsible for practice guideline recommendation changes favoring the use of LMWH in trauma patients by both the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST). , This landmark paper did not, however, utilize a three times a day (every 8 hours) dosing of LDUH for prophylaxis, which is the dosing schedule recommended by earlier trials. LDUH administered every 8 hours was demonstrated to have similar efficacy to LMWH in trauma patients in a recent retrospective study. These results call into question the validity of the conclusions of the 1996 study. Because LDUH is less expensive ($0.50/dose) than LMWH (Enoxaparin, $28/dose), similar effectiveness would imply a significant reduction in the cost of prophylaxis and increased value to patients, providers and accountable care organizations and tax-payers.

To validate this hypothesis the investigators propose to achieve the following study objectives:

1. Assess the degree of risk for VTE in each patient admitted to the trauma service
2. Determine the rate of VTE events in high risk trauma patients receiving either:

* LMWH (30mg enoxaparin) given every twelve hours
* LDUH (5000 Units unfractionated Heparin) given every eight hours.
3. Identify and quantify any adverse events associated with either treatment arm.
4. Compare the value of LMWH versus LDUH in the prophylactic treatment of VTE disease in trauma patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Thromboembolic Disease Deep Vein Thrombosis Pulmonary Embolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

5000 Units unfractionated Heparin Q 8 hr

Low Dose Unfractionated Heparin (5000 Units) given every eight hours until primary or secondary outcome measure reached, discharge, or \>30 days on trauma service.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

5000 Units unfractionated Heparin Q 8 hr

Intervention Type DRUG

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis medication

30mg enoxaparin Q12 hr

Randomly assigned trauma patients to receive Low Molecular Weight Heparin (30mg enoxaparin) given subcutaneously every twelve hours until primary or secondary outcome measure reached, discharge, or \>30 days on trauma service.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

30mg enoxaparin Q12 hr

Intervention Type DRUG

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

5000 Units unfractionated Heparin Q 8 hr

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis medication

Intervention Type DRUG

30mg enoxaparin Q12 hr

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LDUH Lovenox, LMWH, enoxaparin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admitted to Scripps Mercy Trauma Service
* ≥18 Years old
* Stratified to either Significant or Highest risk of VTE by ACCP guidelines

Exclusion Criteria

* Estimated Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≤9
* Likely to be discharged before hospital day 7
* Systemic coagulopathy defined with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of ≥1.2
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \>40
* Likely to Survive for \<7 Days
* Pregnancy
* Evidence of renal insufficiency (Cr ≥1.3)
* Delayed transfer to this facility (\>24 hrs)
* Prisoners
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Scripps Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven R Shackford, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Scripps Mercy Hospital, Department of Trauma Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Scripps Mercy Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-12-5973

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Below Knee DVT Study
NCT03805672 TERMINATED PHASE4