Evaluation of Chemical Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma

NCT ID: NCT06025162

Last Updated: 2023-09-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-21

Study Completion Date

2024-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes up to 100,000 deaths annually. Between 10%-30% of patients die within one month of VTE diagnosis, while survivors remain at increased risk for VTE recurrence or other complications like post-thrombotic syndrome or chronic pulmonary hypertension in the following decade. Trauma patients have many risk factors that predispose them to a VTE. During the first 48 hours after blunt trauma, patients are prothrombotic due to the release of procoagulant factors, have excessive thrombin generation due to extensive tissue and vascular injury, and have reduced circulation of endogenous anticoagulants like protein C.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trauma patients have many risk factors that predispose them to a VTE. During the first 48 hours after blunt trauma, patients are prothrombotic due to the release of procoagulant factors, have excessive thrombin generation due to extensive tissue and vascular injury, and have reduced circulation of endogenous anticoagulants like protein C. Trauma patients are immobile for prolonged periods of time due to frequent surgical intervention and extended sedation. Even when administered chemoprophylaxis, up to 15% of trauma patients develop thromboses. Given the high rates of thromboses, one study validated certain risk factors for VTE among trauma patients. This study categorized patients as high-risk or very high-risk of VTE based on patient-specific factors. High-risk factors for VTE included a history of VTE, repair or ligation of major venous injury, an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) \>2 for the head, a Glasgow coma Scale (GCS) score \<8 for \>4 hours after trauma, and age ≥60 years. Very high-risk factors for VTE consist of complex lower extremity fractures, pelvic fractures, spinal cord injury with associated para- or quadriplegia, and age ≥75 years. The 2020 Western Trauma Association guidelines recommend initiation of VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin within 24 hours of admission in trauma patients, with special consideration for patients with active bleeding, solid organ injury, traumatic brain injury (TBI), or spinal cord injury. Several studies support this recommendation and correlate delays in VTE prophylaxis initiation and interruption in therapy with increased risk of VTE.

Recent evidence also highlights that the standard trauma VTE dosing strategy of 30 mg of enoxaparin twice daily often fails to reach adequate target anti-Xa levels in trauma patients. Thus, consideration of 0.5 mg/kg enoxaparin twice daily with adjustments based on anti-Xa levels may be considered in patients at highest risk of VTE. This strategy may be associated with improved outcomes while mitigating adverse effects like clinically significant bleeding.

Despite these recommendations, providers may choose to delay initiation of VTE prophylaxis due to a patient's apparent bleeding risk. Trauma-induced coagulopathy is present in 20%-25% of patients and is associated with a higher incidence of bleeding, increased transfusion requirements, and elevated risk of multi-organ failure versus patients without this coagulopathy. Additionally, chemical VTE prophylaxis with anticoagulants like LMWH may increase bleeding possibility, especially in patients that are at risk for emergent surgical intervention. Even so, current evidence supports that early initiation of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients, as benefit outweighs bleed risk.

Special trauma populations like TBI, spinal cord injury, and solid organ injury have been the focus of recent studies evaluating bleeding risk after initiation of VTE prophylaxis. In one study, TBI patients were at a significantly increased risk for VTE and substantial delays in VTE prophylaxis initiation (7 days vs 1.5 days) versus non-TBI patients. Concern for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression was most likely found to cause delays in VTE prophylaxis in this high-risk population despite the overall low incidence of this finding.15 In patients with intracranial bleeding, two studies identified that initiation of VTE prophylaxis 24 hours after stable computerized tomography (CT) imaging did not increase risk of ICH progression while decreasing overall incidence of VTE. For patients with blunt solid organ injury, initiation of VTE prophylaxis within 48 hours of injury was not associated with an escalation in bleeding events, but delaying prophylaxis beyond 72 hours correlated with in increased risk for VTE. VTE prophylaxis initiation within 48 hours of non-operative spinal cord injury was also found to significantly reduce VTE incidence versus initiation beyond 48 hours.

In 2020, Methodist Dallas Medical Center's (MDMC's) pharmacy department developed a guideline for VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. This document was designed to improve patient outcomes by providing evidence to assist providers when initiating patients on chemical VTE prophylaxis and support the safe and efficacious use of weight-based VTE prophylaxis regimens in patients at high-risk of VTE. The guideline's algorithm first recommends assessing for contraindications for chemical VTE prophylaxis (like ongoing hemorrhagic shock). After assessing contraindications and creatinine clearance, the document provided guidance on LMWH dosing strategies, suggested patient populations for weight-based prophylaxis regimens, and recommended timeframes for initiation of VTE prophylaxis based on injury type. Patient outcomes have not been assessed since the implementation of MDMC-specific VTE prophylaxis trauma guidelines.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thromboembolism, Venous

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LMWH dosing strategies

MDMC's trauma VTE prophylaxis guideline will be used to classify patients into two treatment arms ("weight-based" or "standard dose") based on their dose of enoxaparin at 48 hours post-VTE prophylaxis initiation

enoxaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

dose of enoxaparin at 48 hours post-VTE prophylaxis initiation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

enoxaparin

dose of enoxaparin at 48 hours post-VTE prophylaxis initiation

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Accessing for contraindication for chemical VTE prophylaxis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥18 years of age
* Admitted to the trauma service between October 1,2021 and March 31, 2022
* Weight ≥50 kg
* Received chemical VTE prophylaxis with LMWH for at least 48 hours
* At "high risk" or "very high risk" of VTE8

Exclusion Criteria

* Death, discharge, or hospice within 48 hours of admission
* Documented heparin allergy (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia)
* Indication for therapeutic anticoagulation, either prior to admission or during hospitalization
* Prisoners
* \<18 years of age
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Methodist Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tamara Reiter, PharmD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Methodist Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Methodist Dallas Medical Center Pharmacy

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

028.PHA.2022.D

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Timing of VTE Prophylaxis in TBI
NCT03081169 WITHDRAWN PHASE4