Evaluation of Chemical Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma
NCT ID: NCT06025162
Last Updated: 2023-09-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-07-21
2024-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anti-Xa Guided Dosing of Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Traumatic Injury: a Multicentre Pilot Randomized Trial
NCT06662253
A Comparison of Extended Versus Conventional Duration of Enoxaparin Prophylaxis (i.e., Preventive Treatment) for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE, i.e., Blood Clots in the Veins) and Bleeding Event Risk in a Population With Acute Medical Illness
NCT05819112
Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in High-Risk Trauma Patients
NCT02412982
Title: Randomized Trial of an EHR Embedded Risk Calculator vs. Standard VTE Prophylaxis for Medical Patients
NCT03243708
Thromboprophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients
NCT00437697
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recent evidence also highlights that the standard trauma VTE dosing strategy of 30 mg of enoxaparin twice daily often fails to reach adequate target anti-Xa levels in trauma patients. Thus, consideration of 0.5 mg/kg enoxaparin twice daily with adjustments based on anti-Xa levels may be considered in patients at highest risk of VTE. This strategy may be associated with improved outcomes while mitigating adverse effects like clinically significant bleeding.
Despite these recommendations, providers may choose to delay initiation of VTE prophylaxis due to a patient's apparent bleeding risk. Trauma-induced coagulopathy is present in 20%-25% of patients and is associated with a higher incidence of bleeding, increased transfusion requirements, and elevated risk of multi-organ failure versus patients without this coagulopathy. Additionally, chemical VTE prophylaxis with anticoagulants like LMWH may increase bleeding possibility, especially in patients that are at risk for emergent surgical intervention. Even so, current evidence supports that early initiation of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients, as benefit outweighs bleed risk.
Special trauma populations like TBI, spinal cord injury, and solid organ injury have been the focus of recent studies evaluating bleeding risk after initiation of VTE prophylaxis. In one study, TBI patients were at a significantly increased risk for VTE and substantial delays in VTE prophylaxis initiation (7 days vs 1.5 days) versus non-TBI patients. Concern for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression was most likely found to cause delays in VTE prophylaxis in this high-risk population despite the overall low incidence of this finding.15 In patients with intracranial bleeding, two studies identified that initiation of VTE prophylaxis 24 hours after stable computerized tomography (CT) imaging did not increase risk of ICH progression while decreasing overall incidence of VTE. For patients with blunt solid organ injury, initiation of VTE prophylaxis within 48 hours of injury was not associated with an escalation in bleeding events, but delaying prophylaxis beyond 72 hours correlated with in increased risk for VTE. VTE prophylaxis initiation within 48 hours of non-operative spinal cord injury was also found to significantly reduce VTE incidence versus initiation beyond 48 hours.
In 2020, Methodist Dallas Medical Center's (MDMC's) pharmacy department developed a guideline for VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. This document was designed to improve patient outcomes by providing evidence to assist providers when initiating patients on chemical VTE prophylaxis and support the safe and efficacious use of weight-based VTE prophylaxis regimens in patients at high-risk of VTE. The guideline's algorithm first recommends assessing for contraindications for chemical VTE prophylaxis (like ongoing hemorrhagic shock). After assessing contraindications and creatinine clearance, the document provided guidance on LMWH dosing strategies, suggested patient populations for weight-based prophylaxis regimens, and recommended timeframes for initiation of VTE prophylaxis based on injury type. Patient outcomes have not been assessed since the implementation of MDMC-specific VTE prophylaxis trauma guidelines.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LMWH dosing strategies
MDMC's trauma VTE prophylaxis guideline will be used to classify patients into two treatment arms ("weight-based" or "standard dose") based on their dose of enoxaparin at 48 hours post-VTE prophylaxis initiation
enoxaparin
dose of enoxaparin at 48 hours post-VTE prophylaxis initiation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
enoxaparin
dose of enoxaparin at 48 hours post-VTE prophylaxis initiation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Admitted to the trauma service between October 1,2021 and March 31, 2022
* Weight ≥50 kg
* Received chemical VTE prophylaxis with LMWH for at least 48 hours
* At "high risk" or "very high risk" of VTE8
Exclusion Criteria
* Documented heparin allergy (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia)
* Indication for therapeutic anticoagulation, either prior to admission or during hospitalization
* Prisoners
* \<18 years of age
* Pregnancy
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Methodist Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tamara Reiter, PharmD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methodist Dallas Medical Center Pharmacy
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
028.PHA.2022.D
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.