Effect of Heparin on Femoral Arterial Sheaths Thrombosis During Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
NCT ID: NCT01260519
Last Updated: 2010-12-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
304 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of blood clots in femoral arterial sheaths during coronary angiographic procedures and the effect of heparin administration on thrombus formation.
BACKGROUND:
A heparinized saline flushes are used during diagnostic coronary angiography to prevent thrombus formation within the lumen of the sheath. However, the use of prophylactic intravenous heparin following the femoral arterial sheath insertion is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2000 units heparin intravenous bolus versus saline placebo on thrombus formation within arterial sheath during the diagnostic coronary angiography.
Methods A randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of intravenous heparin bolus compared with placebo in prevention of femoral arterial sheath thrombus formation in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography.
The study included all adult patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Eligible patients were recruited from day-case and in-patients wards of the Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre (PSCC), Riyadh. Patients with abnormal coagulation profile, abnormal platelet count and those receiving enoxaparin, or glycoprotein IIb/IIa antagonists were excluded.
Since the coronary interventions require anticoagulation during the procedure, our study was interested in the diagnostic part. After insertion of femoral arterial sheath one group was allocated to 2 milliliter solution containing 2000 units of heparin and the other group to similar amount of placebo solution which is blinded to both patient and operating catheterization laboratory staff. Arterial access was obtained via femoral approach and 6F to 7F Sheaths were used. The femoral sheath was aspirated and flushed for presence of thrombi or obstruction after each catheter exchange and at the end of the procedure. Two steps aspiration was performed where 5 cc of blood were extracted in one syringe then another saline filled syringe was used for flushing. We used clean white gauze to look for presence of thrombi, and if thrombi were noticed further aspiration was performed followed by saline flush. Any visible thrombus at any stage of the procedure was considered positive. The patients evaluated and assessed clinically during hospital stay for presence of leg ischemia, Femoral and Pedal pulses, Local hematoma or bleeding.
All patients gave informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the PSCC Ethics Committee.
Randomization Patients were randomized based catheterization laboratory flow, where the first laboratory assigned to treatment number one and the second laboratory assigned to treatment number two on alternate days, sealed and labeled syringes that contained the treatment allocation came from pharmacy on daily basis and handled to an independent laboratory staff nurse assigned to maintain concealed to patients and healthcare providers Throughout the study. The labels were uncovered opened only after the femoral puncture and arterial sheath insertion confirmed and the patient had provided written informed consent to participate in the study. Once the seal was broken, the patient was considered irrevocably randomized.
Study Interventions Patients were randomized to receive either heparin or placebo. Patients in the heparin group received 2000 units (2 ml) of unfractionated heparin intravenous bolus. Those randomized to the placebo received 2ml of saline based solution intravenous bolus.
The femoral sheath was aspirated and flushed for presence of thrombi or obstruction after each catheter exchange and at the end of the procedure. Two steps aspiration was performed where 5 cc of blood were extracted in one syringe then another saline filled syringe was used for flushing. We used clean white gauze to look for presence of thrombi, and if thrombi were noticed further aspiration was performed followed by saline flush. Any visible thrombus at any stage of the procedure was considered positive. The patients evaluated and assessed clinically during hospital stay for presence of leg ischemia, Femoral and Pedal pulses, Local hematoma or bleeding.
Outcomes The primary end point was the occurrence of arterial sheath thrombi, defined as Any visible thrombus during sheath blood aspiration at any stage of the procedure. The second primary end point was efficacy of intravenous heparin bolus in reducing the risk of thrombus formation.
Patients were monitored for embolic and bleeding events until they were discharged from the hospital. Embolic events defined as appearance of symptoms and signs of acute limb ischemia like acute leg pain and loss of pedal pulses that result in interventional or surgical exploration. Bleeding events was defined as local femoral access bleeding or hematoma that led to surgical exploration.
The diagnosis of embolization or hematoma was made clinically (loss of arterial pulse or evidence of leg ischemia) and confirmed by Doppler studies when appropriate.
Outcomes were assessed by the patients' treating physicians, who were aware of treatment assignment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
active arm: heparin
Heparin
unfractionated heparin 2000 unites
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Heparin
unfractionated heparin 2000 unites
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Platelet count \<100,000/mm3
* Patient with bleeding diathesis or hypercoagulable state.
* Use of chronic anticoagulation with INR \> 1.4
* Patient refusal or inability to follow the protocol
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Adult Cardiology Department.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Adult Cardiology Department.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abdulrahman M Almoghairi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre (PSCC)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prince Sultan Cardiac Center
Riyadh, Central, Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PSCC-00001- HT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id