Gender-based Differences in the Outcome of the Treatment of Persistent Septic Shock With Hydrocortisone
NCT ID: NCT06537180
Last Updated: 2024-08-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
621 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
HCT+F vs. HCT Alone in Critically Ill Medical Septic Shock Patients
NCT03710187
Initiation of Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock
NCT02580240
Hydrocortisone for Prevention of Septic Shock
NCT00670254
Evaluation of the Role of Hydrocortisone Either Alone or Combined With Fludrocortisone in the Outcome of Septic Shock in Adults
NCT04492280
Shock Indices Use for Early Mortality From Septic Shock
NCT05088109
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Interestingly, corticosteroid treatment was reported to be more cost-effective in females than in males with septic shock, compared with placebo. This may be explained by the fact that sex hormones modulate the expression and sensitivity of glucocorticoid receptors differently, potentially influencing the body's response to cortisol. To the best of our knowledge, the data available on whether females and males may be more or less likely to acquire a better or worse prognosis of persistent septic shock when treated with hydrocortisone is sparse.
The aim of this study is to explore the gender-based differences in the outcomes of treatment with hydrocortisone in critically ill patients with persistent septic shock.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The Female Group
Patients are categorized as females according to their apparent gender.
No interventions assigned to this group
The Male Group
Patients are categorized as males according to their apparent gender.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexandria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University Hospitals
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GBD-HYDRO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.