Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-03
2024-11-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Positive Psychotherapy-Based Self-Compassion Training on Internalized Stigma, Loneliness, and Empathy Levels of Parents of Children With Special Needs
NCT07124104
Effect of Problem-Solving Training
NCT05688319
The Effects of Group Social Work Intervention on Children's Emotional Intelligence, Emotion Regulation Skills and Empathy Tendencies
NCT07273786
The Effect of Education Programme on School Age Children's Attitudes Towards Children With Special Needs
NCT06163521
The Effect of Emotion Recognition and Empathy Focused Education Program Applied to Earthquake Survivors on Anxiety, Rumination and Post-traumatic Growth Levels of Children
NCT05815966
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data Collection Tool: A questionnaire form consisting of five sections will be used in the study.
Distribution of descriptive characteristics of caregivers: It consists of descriptive questions such as age, gender, education status, economic status, difficulties encountered in child care, and methods used in coping with caregiving.
Psychological well-being scales (PİOÖ) are a scale developed by Ryff (1989) that aims to measure psychological well-being. Psychological Well-being Scales Short Form (PİOÖ-42) was developed by Akın et al. (2012) conducted a validity and reliability study. The PBIÖ is a short form of 42 questions. The PBIÖ is a self-report scale developed by Ryff (1989) that aims to measure psychological well-being. It consists of 6 sub-dimensions (self-acceptance, positive relationships, autonomy, environmental mastery, life purpose and personal development) with 14 questions each, and a total of 84 questions. The scale is scored with a 7-point Likert-type scale, and the highest score that can be obtained is 504 and the lowest score is 84. High scores indicate high psychological well-being. Permission has been obtained for the use of the scale.
\*Caregiver Burden Scale (CBBS): The Caregiver Burden Scale is a data collection tool developed by Zarit, Reever and Bach-Peterson (1980) to assess the difficulties experienced by caregivers and to reveal this situation. The adaptation of the scale to Turkish was conducted by İnci. The Caregiver Burden Scale consists of 22 items applied without a time limit. The scale has a Likert-type evaluation ranging from 0 to 4 as "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "often" and "almost always". The minimum score from 0 to 88 points can be obtained from the scale, and a high score means high distress. The version of the scale adapted to Turkish consists of a single dimension, and the internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.95. Permission for use of the scale was obtained by İnci. \*Emotion Expression Scale: The Emotion Expression Scale was developed by King and Emmons in 1990. The purpose of this scale is to measure some general emotional expressions. The scale, which is based on Likert-type grading, consists of 15 items. The content of the items is related to the tendency of positive, negative, and close emotions. The scale items provide information about the emotional expressions of the individual in interpersonal relationships as well as independently of interpersonal relationships. Focusing on expressive behaviors, the scale was prepared by taking into account both positive and negative emotions. Each item is scored between 1 and 7. 1: indicates that the person strongly disagrees, while 7: indicates that they strongly agree. High scores obtained from the scale indicate that their tendency to express emotions is also high. Permission has been obtained for the use of the scale. \*Stress Coping Styles Scale: The Stress Coping Styles Scale (SCTQ) was developed in 1980 by Folkman and Lazarus under the name of "Coping Ways Inventory" as a 68-item, 4-point Likert-type scale. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Şahin and his colleagues in 1992. The shortened form for university students, the Stress Coping Styles Scale (SCTQ), was shortened and re-created by Şahin and Durak in 1995. When the scale was reduced to 30 items and shortened to its final form, it was divided into the following categories: self-confident approach, helpless approach, submissive approach, optimistic approach, and social support seeking approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
trial (initiative will be implemented)
Art therapy artistic therapy, wood painting, lithography, jewelry design, mud free shaping, expression workshop and training workshops
Art therapy
artistic therapy, wood painting, lithography, jewelry design, mud free shaping, expression workshop and training workshops
control
standart care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Art therapy
artistic therapy, wood painting, lithography, jewelry design, mud free shaping, expression workshop and training workshops
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria:Not volunteering to participate in the study
30 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
OTHER
Kastamonu University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Havva Kaçan
Assoc. Prof, Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kastamonu University
Kastamonu, Kastamonu, Turkey (Türkiye)
Kastamonu Üniversity
Kastamonu, Kastamonu, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Havva Kaçan, Dr
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Kastamonu
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.