H. Pylori Eradication With Argon Plasma During Endoscopy
NCT ID: NCT06529159
Last Updated: 2025-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-08
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Two different PAL generation modalities will be compared in this study:
1. HEAPE direct: This modality is the direct generation of PAL in the stomach. The stomach is filled with sodium chloride solution which is then treated with APC. With HEAPE direct a potential decrease of reactive species is avoided, as the treatment happens directly at the intended location in the H. pylori infected stomach.
2. Pre-HEAPE: This modality features the treatment of sodium chloride with APC outside of the patient in a sterile container. After the APC treatment, the generated PAL is administered into the stomach with a syringe through the working channel of the endoscope. Pre-HEAPE allows an easier handling of the APC probe as the treatment of the sodium chloride solution can be done without an endoscope.
To evaluate the immediate effect of this novel treatment approach the metabolic activity of H. pylori will be assessed using a urea breath test (UBT) before and after treatment. A reduction in H. pylori levels can be detected by a reduction in urease activity in the breath test.
After the HEAPE procedure, patients are treated with antibiotics (best practice) as they would be under normal circumstances. Four weeks after treatment, another UBT is performed to determine if H. pylori has been eradicated or if additional antibiotic treatment is indicated.
This two-arm, randomized, pilot, single-center, prospective clinical study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and proof of concept that PAL has the ability to eradicate or reduce the bacterial load of H. pylori in humans.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Marginal Ulcer Healing With Low-Thermal Argon Plasma Endoscopic Treatment
NCT06543316
Effect of H. Pylori Eradication on The Improvement of Gastrointestinal Symptoms
NCT07272681
H. Pylori Testing for Patients With Non-specific Upper Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
NCT01376414
Efficacy and Safety of HYbrid Argon Plasma Coagulation Technique in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus-Related Dysplasia
NCT05645679
Argon Plasma Coagulation for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
NCT02241044
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current treatments for H. pylori infection, which typically consist of triple or quadruple therapy combining two or three antibiotics with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), are successful in approximately 80% of cases. This leaves a significant proportion of cases unresolved. In addition, the emergence of multidrug-resistant H. pylori strains, particularly those resistant to clarithromycin and quinolones, challenges these conventional approaches. The broader issue of increasing antibiotic resistance, leads to a reliance on back-up antibiotics for cases where standard treatments fail. A sharp decline of eradication rates during the last decade, underscores the need for alternative therapeutic strategies. A recent study estimated the total cost of H. pylori treatment failure to be over $5.3 billion in the U.S., primarily due to hospitalizations, medications, and outpatient visits for complications such as peptic ulcer disease and non-cardia gastric cancer. Research into treatments beyond antibiotics is needed to address the growing risk of resistance and to ensure sustainable, effective solutions for H. pylori infection.
The field of plasma medicine, particularly through the use of Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC), offers promising new avenues for addressing this challenge. APC, a technology with over 30 years of clinical safety and efficacy, has been utilized for bleeding management, ablation of cancerous tissues, and precise treatments in sensitive areas. More recently, it has shown good efficacy in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN) at lower power levels with no visible macroscopic thermal effect. Recent advancements in plasma medicine have highlighted the antibacterial properties of physical plasma. It has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in wound healing by effectively eradicating bacterial infections, including those resistant to antibiotics. The effect of non-thermal plasma treatment is based on the high energy and voltage of the plasma, which generates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), an electric field that can cause electroporative effects, and UV light emitted in the plasma.
These effects are present when plasma is applied directly to the site of action, but also when a liquid medium such as sodium chloride solution is used as a buffer substance. This concept of indirect plasma treatment is often referred to as Plasma Activated Liquid (PAL). In proprietary preclinical studies, PAL generated with APC probes using forced APC Effect 8 has been shown to achieve a 5-log reduction in H. pylori (SK225) after 15 minutes incubation. In a multidrug resistant E. coli 4MRGN stain (VC8874), a 6-log reduction was achieved after 15 minutes incubation.
This demonstrates that PAL harnesses the antimicrobial properties of plasma in a non-thermal, liquid-based approach. This innovative approach allows the effects of plasma to be applied to large surface areas, such as the gastric mucosa, offering a potentially effective treatment for H. pylori infection without the drawbacks associated with antibiotic resistance. The established safety record of APC and the common use of liquids as irrigation or injection solutions in endoscopy provide a solid foundation for its potential applications in the treatment of H. pylori infection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HEAPE direct
This modality is the direct generation of PAL in the stomach. The stomach is filled with sodium chloride solution which is then treated with APC. With HEAPE direct a potential decrease of reactive species is avoided, as the treatment happens directly at the intended location in the H. pylori infected stomach.
HEAPE
The stomach is filled with sodium chloride solution which is then treated with APC to activate it into an antibacterial solution.
Pre-HEAPE
This modality features the treatment of sodium chloride with APC outside of the patient in a sterile container. After the APC treatment, the generated PAL is administered into the stomach with a syringe through the working channel of the endoscope. Pre-HEAPE allows an easier handling of the APC probe as the treatment of the sodium chloride solution can be done without an endoscope.
Pre-HEAPE
Plasma activated sodium chloride solution (prepared outside of the body) is administered into the patients stomach through an endoscope channel using a syringe.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HEAPE
The stomach is filled with sodium chloride solution which is then treated with APC to activate it into an antibacterial solution.
Pre-HEAPE
Plasma activated sodium chloride solution (prepared outside of the body) is administered into the patients stomach through an endoscope channel using a syringe.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Confirmed untreated H. pylori infection
3. Able to understand and sign informed consent
4. Available to return for all routine follow-up study visits
5. Patients should have upper endoscopy scheduled according to latest guidelines, e.g., as a part of their diagnostic work-up of HP positive test, regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy or puerperium
3. Severe cardiopulmonary disease or a history of coronary artery disease (including myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, poorly controlled hypertension, required use of NSAIDs)
4. Lactation
5. An inability to provide informed consent
6. Any other condition which the investigator may deem as an impediment to compliance or hinder completion of the proposed study.
7. Hernias / aspiration risk
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
INDUSTRY
Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc
Director of Endoscopy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christopher C Thompson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, Malfertheiner P, Graham DY, Wong VWS, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Kaplan GG, Ng SC. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):420-429. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Wang C, Yuan Y, Hunt RH. The association between Helicobacter pylori infection and early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1789-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01335.x. Epub 2007 May 23.
Mrochen DM, Miebach L, Skowski H, Bansemer R, Drechsler CA, Hofmanna U, Hein M, Mamat U, Gerling T, Schaible U, von Woedtke T, Bekeschus S. Toxicity and virucidal activity of a neon-driven micro plasma jet on eukaryotic cells and a coronavirus. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022 Oct;191:105-118. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.08.026. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
Liou JM, Malfertheiner P, Lee YC, Sheu BS, Sugano K, Cheng HC, Yeoh KG, Hsu PI, Goh KL, Mahachai V, Gotoda T, Chang WL, Chen MJ, Chiang TH, Chen CC, Wu CY, Leow AH, Wu JY, Wu DC, Hong TC, Lu H, Yamaoka Y, Megraud F, Chan FKL, Sung JJ, Lin JT, Graham DY, Wu MS, El-Omar EM; Asian Pacific Alliance on Helicobacter and Microbiota (APAHAM). Screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention: the Taipei global consensus. Gut. 2020 Dec;69(12):2093-2112. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322368. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Cavaleiro-Pinto M, Peleteiro B, Lunet N, Barros H. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cardia cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Mar;22(3):375-87. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9707-2. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain CA, Atherton J, Axon AT, Bazzoli F, Gensini GF, Gisbert JP, Graham DY, Rokkas T, El-Omar EM, Kuipers EJ; European Helicobacter Study Group. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection--the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report. Gut. 2012 May;61(5):646-64. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302084.
Argueta EA, Alsamman MA, Moss SF, D'Agata EMC. Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance Rates on Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a US Population. Gastroenterology. 2021 May;160(6):2181-2183.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 9. No abstract available.
Shiota S, Reddy R, Alsarraj A, El-Serag HB, Graham DY. Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Among Male United States Veterans. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Sep;13(9):1616-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
Megraud F, Graham DY, Howden CW, Trevino E, Weissfeld A, Hunt B, Smith N, Leifke E, Chey WD. Rates of Antimicrobial Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Isolates From Clinical Trial Patients Across the US and Europe. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 1;118(2):269-275. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002045. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
Shah S, Hubscher E, Pelletier C, Jacob R, Vinals L, Yadlapati R. Helicobacter pylori infection treatment in the United States: clinical consequences and costs of eradication treatment failure. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;16(4):341-357. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2056015. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Zenker M. Argon plasma coagulation. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2008 Nov 3;3(1):Doc15.
Eickhoff A, Jakobs R, Schilling D, Hartmann D, Weickert U, Enderle MD, Eickhoff JC, Riemann JF. Prospective nonrandomized comparison of two modes of argon beamer (APC) tumor desobstruction: effectiveness of the new pulsed APC versus forced APC. Endoscopy. 2007 Jul;39(7):637-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966571.
Kwan V, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Gillespie PE, Murray MA, Kaffes AJ, Henriquez MS, Chan RO. Argon plasma coagulation in the management of symptomatic gastrointestinal vascular lesions: experience in 100 consecutive patients with long-term follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;101(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00370.x.
Vargo JJ. Clinical applications of the argon plasma coagulator. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jan;59(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02296-x. No abstract available.
Grund KE, Straub T, Farin G. New haemostatic techniques: argon plasma coagulation. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;13(1):67-84. doi: 10.1053/bega.1999.0009.
Grund KE, Zindel C, Farin G. [Argon plasma coagulation through a flexible endoscope. Evaluation of a new therapeutic method after 1606 uses]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1997 Apr 4;122(14):432-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1047634. German.
Grund KE, Storek D, Farin G. Endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) first clinical experiences in flexible endoscopy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994 Feb;2(1):42-6.
Weiss M, Arnholdt M, Hissnauer A, Fischer I, Schonfisch B, Andress J, Gerstner S, Dannehl D, Bosmuller H, Staebler A, Brucker SY, Henes M. Tissue-preserving treatment with non-invasive physical plasma of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-a prospective controlled clinical trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 15;10:1242732. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1242732. eCollection 2023.
Marzi J, Stope MB, Henes M, Koch A, Wenzel T, Holl M, Layland SL, Neis F, Bosmuller H, Ruoff F, Templin M, Kramer B, Staebler A, Barz J, Carvajal Berrio DA, Enderle M, Loskill PM, Brucker SY, Schenke-Layland K, Weiss M. Noninvasive Physical Plasma as Innovative and Tissue-Preserving Therapy for Women Positive for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;14(8):1933. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081933.
Han Q, He ZY, Chongshan Z, Wen X, Ni YY. The optimization of plasma activated water (PAW) generation and the inactivation mechanism of PAW on Escherichia coli. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2022;46(11):1-12.
Traylor MJ, Pavlovich MJ, Karim S et al. Long-term antibacterial efficacy of air plasma-activated water. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2011; 44: 472001
Chen TP, Liang J, Su TL. Plasma-activated water: antibacterial activity and artifacts? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Sep;25(27):26699-26706. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9169-0. Epub 2017 May 24.
Schmidt M, Hahn V, Altrock B et al. Plasma-Activation of Larger Liquid Volumes by an Inductively-Limited Discharge for Antimicrobial Purposes. Applied Sciences 2019; 9: 2150
Ma M, Zhang Y, Lv Y et al. The key reactive species in the bactericidal process of plasma activated water. Journal of Applied Physics 2020; 53:185207
Mai-Prochnow A, Zhou R, Zhang T, Ostrikov KK, Mugunthan S, Rice SA, Cullen PJ. Interactions of plasma-activated water with biofilms: inactivation, dispersal effects and mechanisms of action. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021 Jan 27;7(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00180-6.
Wang L, Xia C, Guo Y, Yang C, Cheng C, Zhao J, Yang X, Cao Z. Bactericidal efficacy of cold atmospheric plasma treatment against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Future Microbiol. 2020 Jan;15:115-125. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0265. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
Yang L, Niyazi G, Qi Y, Yao Z, Huang L, Wang Z, Guo L, Liu D. Plasma-Activated Saline Promotes Antibiotic Treatment of Systemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Aug 22;10(8):1018. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10081018.
Adamovich I, Agarwal S, Ahedo E et al. The 2022 Plasma Roadmap: low temperature plasma science and technology. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2022; 55: 373001
Wang Z, Qi Y, Guo L et al. The bactericidal effects of plasma-activated saline prepared by the combination of surface discharge plasma and plasma jet. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2021; 54: 385202
Zhao Y-M, Ojha S, Burgess CM et al. Inactivation efficacy of plasma-activated water: influence of plasma treatment time, exposure time and bacterial species. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021; 56: 721-732
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024P002031
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.