Reduction of Pain in Colonoscopy - Loop First Versus Last
NCT ID: NCT06521658
Last Updated: 2025-02-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-23
2025-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As part of a normal endoscopic examination, the tip of the endoscope is bent (retroflexed) to look "backward" into the rectum. This is done to better see the inside of the rectal opening. Performing such a retroflexion of the scope is often associated with discomfort/pain for the patient. It takes 5-10 seconds. There are no guidelines on when such a retroflexion should be done - at the beginning or at the end of the procedure. The aim is to investigate whether the timing of retroflexion makes a difference in the recollection of pain following the procedure. In this way, the pain of colonoscopy might be reduced in the future simply by changing the timing of the retroflexion.
The study is solely about performing this retroflexion either at the beginning or at the end of the examination. Nothing is changed in the diagnostic part of the examination.
The background of the study is a study from 2003 that shows that taking about a one-minute pause in the rectum at the end of the colonoscopy can reduce the overall pain perception of the examination. This was shown without changing the pain during the procedure and despite the fact that the examination itself was prolonged due to the intervention. This relationship is explained by studies showing that the pain experience at the end of a procedure has a greater influence than the pain experience at the beginning of a procedure on the overall pain experience.
Hypothesis: By retroflexing in the rectum first during a colonoscopy versus at the end, patients will perceive the overall procedure as less painful.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Towards Painless Colonoscopy
NCT04093687
Predictive Model Identifies Painful Sedation-free Colonoscopy
NCT06635941
Colonoscopy Endoguide in Specialist Practice
NCT01055782
Same Day Bidirectional Endoscopies - Does the Sequence of Procedures or Choice of Insufflator Matter?
NCT02635217
Endocuff Enhanced Colonoscopy: Does it Improve Polyp Detection and Make Rectal Retroflexion Unnecessary
NCT05615857
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
loop first
Those will have the retroflexion/looping of the colonoscope performed as the first part of the colonoscopy
No interventions assigned to this group
loop last
Those will have the retroflexion/looping of the colonoscope performed as the last part of the colonoscopy
Timing of retroflexion
The intervention is the timing of the retroflexion/looping of the colonoscope in the rectum
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Timing of retroflexion
The intervention is the timing of the retroflexion/looping of the colonoscope in the rectum
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* colonoscopy under general anæsthesia
* patients not fluent in danish
* patients uanable to understand the study (e.g. people with diagnosed or suspected dementia)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Sønderjylland
Aabenraa, , Denmark
Esbjerg Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark
Esbjerg, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24/27699
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.