Left-colon WEC May Reduce Insertion Time Compared With Whole-colon WEC.

NCT ID: NCT01735266

Last Updated: 2013-09-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2013-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In most of situation, left colon (especially SD junction) is considered the most difficult part of colonoscopy, where endoscopist may encounter difficulty for scope insertion and patients may feel pain or uncomfortable. It is suggested more than half of the whole time for scope insertion should be used in left colon. Many methods, such as water immersion, abdominal palpation, have been used to facilitate insertion in left colon.

Colonoscopy with whole-colon water exchange method has been shown to be useful for reducing medication used, pain experienced during colonoscopy, increasing the success rate of cecum intubation and adenoma detection rate in sedated and unsedated patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. Exchange of water during scope insertion minimizes loop formation and prevents lengthening and distension of the colon during colonoscopy. This will facilitate the colonoscopy in average or difficult colonoscopy. However, it is not known whether the benefits of water exchange method of colonoscopy was mainly due to its effect on the left colon.

We hypothesized that left-colon water exchange colonoscopy (LWE) may have the similar effect regarding the maximal pain score and mean pain score in unsedated patients compared with whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy (WWE). At the mean time, LWE may reduce the insertion time compared with WWE. Here we performed a prospective, randomized controlled study to investigate the efficacies of whole-colon water exchange, left-colon water exchange and air methods of colonoscopy on pain score and insertion time in unsedated outpatients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polyp Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Colonoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Air colonoscopy

Air was insufflated during whole procedure of colonoscope insertion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Air colonoscopy

Intervention Type OTHER

Colonoscopy will be performed with conventional air insufflation during colonoscope insertion.

Whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy

The air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During the whole procedure of the scope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C (maintained with a water bath) water was infused with a peristaltic pump to obtain lumen visualization. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Water exchange colonoscopy

Intervention Type OTHER

Water exchange method (The air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During colonoscope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C water was infused into lumen to obtain lumen visualization) was used in whole or left colon. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.

left-colon water exchange colonoscopy

In the left side of colon (including descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum), water was infused instead of air to obtain lumen visualization as described above in whole-colon water exchange colonoscopy group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Water exchange colonoscopy

Intervention Type OTHER

Water exchange method (The air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During colonoscope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C water was infused into lumen to obtain lumen visualization) was used in whole or left colon. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Air colonoscopy

Colonoscopy will be performed with conventional air insufflation during colonoscope insertion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Water exchange colonoscopy

Water exchange method (The air pump was turned off before colonoscopy. During colonoscope insertion, residual air in lumen was suctioned and 37°C water was infused into lumen to obtain lumen visualization) was used in whole or left colon. Air was insufflated until cecum was reached or appendix opening was seen.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Water aided colonoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Outpatients with unsedated colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* history of colon resection
* severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumor
* hemodynamic instability
* current pregnancy
* inability to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Air Force Military Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanglin Pan

Associated professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yanglin Pan, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Air Force Military Medical University, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Endoscopic center, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang X, Luo H, Xiang Y, Leung FW, Wang L, Zhang L, Liu Z, Wu K, Fan D, Pan Y, Guo X. Left-colon water exchange preserves the benefits of whole colon water exchange at reduced cecal intubation time conferring significant advantage in diagnostic colonoscopy - a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;50(7):916-23. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1010569. Epub 2015 Feb 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25639787 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20121108-5

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id