Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
762 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-27
2030-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective is to compare the frequency of the various ocular findings between the main alterations of arteritic and non-arteritic aetiology, such as Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (A-AION) Vs. Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NA-AION) or Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO) from GCA Vs. from other causes, through a comprehensive clinical and instrumental evaluation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Significant Carotid Stenosis on Retinal Perfusion Measured Via Automated Retinal Oximetry
NCT06085612
the Effects of Cerebral Collateral Circulation on the Outcome of Leukoaraiosis in High-risk Population
NCT03246373
Study of Arterial Recanalization of the Central Retinal Artery Occlusions
NCT03049514
Stopping Cognitive Decline and Dementia by Fighting Covert Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
NCT05306834
"Carotid Web Incidence and Radiological Classification, Determination of Its Relationship With Ischemic Stroke"
NCT06058507
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (A-AION), which is present in 90% of cases of irreversible vision loss; it is secondary to ischaemic involvement of the short posterior ciliary arteries that supply the optic nerve head; direct ophthalmoscopy shows typically an oedematous and pale optic disc, with a resolution in cupping characteristics like in glaucomatous optic neuropathy after 4 weeks. In the presence of cilio-retinal artery, the vascular territory of this arterial variation could be involved. This ophthalmological image is being considered for differential diagnosis with non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NA-AION). NA-AION is caused by a compartment syndrome that occurs at the level of the optic nerve head. This is triggered by even transient hypoperfusion that causes ischemic swelling in an area with little room to expand at the level of the lamina cribrosa. As the therapy is completely different, the differentiation between A-AION and NA-AION is crucial: Hayreh et al. differ these conditions according to the extra-ocular features of GCA and the ophthalmological characteristics (presence of pallor/papillary haemorrhages, cilio-retinal occlusion if arising from a territory with choroidal ischaemia and evidence of choroidal ischaemia or delayed choroidal perfusion).
* In 15% of cases, internal retinal ischaemia occurred during GCA due to involvement of the central retinal artery (CRAO) or one of its branches (BRAO). Direct ophthalmoscopy shows peripheral retinal whitening in contrast to the cherry-red macula. Sub-occlusive involvement of the retinal vasculature provides necrotic spots of certain retinal layers, providing superficial cottony exudates and deep paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM). PAMM was first described in 2013. A single study about 52 patients with visual GCA observed PAMM in 26% of patients, either isolated or in association with other forms of visual involvement. However, this diagnosis requires evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
* In 5% of cases of GCA, posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION) occurs due to altered circulation in the retrobulbar optic nerve. No typical retinal or optic nerve changes are evident on direct ophthalmoscopy.
Various unmet needs in the ophthalmological literature could impact on the management of patients with acute visual impairment in suspected GCA:
1. Semeiological aspects of the rare visual phenotypes are described in studies with sample sizes ranging between 8 and 85 subjects. Multicenter studies with the largest sample sizes and ten-year recruitment do not explain deeply all ophthalmological pictures meanwhile small studies interfere with a clear description of the entire spectrum of ophthalmic semeiotic manifestations, highlighting only the most frequent phenotypes and making diagnosis very complex to date. In this center, among 60 patients enrolled in the last 3 years, 5 patients with PAMM and 2 with atypical A-AION were described, complicating the diagnostic-therapeutic procedure.
2. Types of enrolled GCA patients are a limiting aspect, due to the evolution of vasculitis definition, diagnosis and management (i.e. last updated in American College of Rheumatology guidelines of 2022) and awareness about diagnosis delay and visual prognosis. Therefore, it is important to define ophthalmological manifestations and frequency distributions in enrolled patients according to recent criteria and current clinical practices.
3. Many studies with an ophthalmological focus were published several years ago. New ophthalmological clinical pictures have been recognised (such as PAMM, in 2013) and ophthalmology-focused instrumental technology has advanced considerably, such as high-OCT, Optical Coherence Resonance (OCR) and angio-Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT-A). Moreover, considering that extra-ocular manifestations of GCA may be absent in approximately 20% of patients with visual involvement, it is particularly important to update semeiological knowledge and predictive and prognostic values.
4. PAMM in GCA was described in a few epidemiological studies with a small sample size. Although PAMM could represent the second most frequent form of visual impairment in GCA, OCT is not yet widely used and/or practised in comparison with traditional methods such as ophthalmoscopy and fluoroangiography.
This observational study aims to improve the ophthalmological description of different visual involvement phenotypes in GCA. This will be achieved by utilizing state-of-the-art technology and nosographic knowledge to improve patient diagnosis and prognostic stratification.
The primary objective is a comparison of the frequency of the various semeiological findings by multi-parametric evaluation, among the main pathological ocular alterations of arteritic and non-arteritic aetiology (e.g. A-AION Vs. NA-AION, CRAO from arteritis Vs. CRAO from other causes). The second objectives are:
* Prevalence of the GCA visual phenotypes, including the potential co-existence of several of them (e.g. paracellular retinal ischemia as in PAMM, choroidal and papillary ischemia).
* Integration of clinical findings with ophthalmological methods such as visual acuity, campimetry, retinal fluorangiography, OCT, and OCT-A in various pathological visual conditions.
* Temporal evolution of the visual acuity and semeiological findings after therapy and correlation with prognosis.
This prospective study enrolls patients referred to the emergency room or ophthalmology outpatient clinic for new-onset visual symptoms, for which they will perform the clinical, laboratory and instrumental examinations required by existing clinical practice. For patients with suspected GCA, venous blood samples (18 ml per sample) are scheduled at baseline, and at times 7 days, 3 months and 6 months.
Clinical management and treatment will follow international recommendations per the 2021 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and 2018 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines, due to the progression of acute visual impairment leading to permanent visual loss. Ophthalmological assessment will be scheduled at baseline (T0), which is repeated after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4) and 26 ± 2 weeks (T5). At each time point, the evaluation includes an assessment of visual acuity, fundus, and visual field. The ophthalmologist frequently recommends fluorescein (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), OCT with high-resolution technique, and OCT-A. In addition to the ophthalmological assessment, patients will also undergo an internal and immuno-rheumatological evaluation to address the management and treatment of the underlying condition causing the visual impairment. Internal or immuno-rheumatology follow-up will depend on the underlying diagnosis and follow normal clinical practice.
In case of suspected ocular flare-up, the ophthalmologist may consider performing a full or partial ophthalmological work-up based on clinical need. The clinical-instrumental data obtained from the ophthalmological assessments will be collected in a standardised electronic database according to the variables described in the case report form (CRF).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GCA patients
Patients older than 18 years with clinically suspected or confirmed giant cell arteritis, who experience newly diagnosed visual impairment with suspected or confirmed correlation with vasculitis.
Fluorescein and Indocyanine green Angiography
The ophthalmologist frequently recommends fluorescein (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) at baseline (T0) to evaluate retinal and choroidal vascularisation. They can be repeated also after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4) or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
High-resolution Optical Coherence Tomography
The ophthalmologist often suggests performing HR-OCT initially (T0) to assess the width of the macula and optic nerve with potential signs of ischemic lesions in these areas. This assessment can also be repeated after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4), or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
Angio-Optical Coherence Tomography
The ophthalmologist often suggests OCT-A at the beginning (T0) to assess the retinal and choroidal vascularization. These tests can also be done after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4), or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
Non arteritis patients
Patients over 18 years of age who experience newly diagnosed acute visual impairment with GCA phenotypes (e.g. AION, CRAO) but without any correlation with vasculitis aetiology.
Fluorescein and Indocyanine green Angiography
The ophthalmologist frequently recommends fluorescein (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) at baseline (T0) to evaluate retinal and choroidal vascularisation. They can be repeated also after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4) or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
High-resolution Optical Coherence Tomography
The ophthalmologist often suggests performing HR-OCT initially (T0) to assess the width of the macula and optic nerve with potential signs of ischemic lesions in these areas. This assessment can also be repeated after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4), or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
Angio-Optical Coherence Tomography
The ophthalmologist often suggests OCT-A at the beginning (T0) to assess the retinal and choroidal vascularization. These tests can also be done after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4), or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fluorescein and Indocyanine green Angiography
The ophthalmologist frequently recommends fluorescein (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) at baseline (T0) to evaluate retinal and choroidal vascularisation. They can be repeated also after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4) or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
High-resolution Optical Coherence Tomography
The ophthalmologist often suggests performing HR-OCT initially (T0) to assess the width of the macula and optic nerve with potential signs of ischemic lesions in these areas. This assessment can also be repeated after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4), or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
Angio-Optical Coherence Tomography
The ophthalmologist often suggests OCT-A at the beginning (T0) to assess the retinal and choroidal vascularization. These tests can also be done after 48-72 hours (T1), 7 ± 2 days (T2), 4 ± 1 weeks (T3), 12 ± 2 weeks (T4), or 26 ± 2 weeks (T5).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients older than 18 years with clinically suspected or confirmed gigantocellular arteritis.
* Newly found visual involvement with suspected or confirmed correlation with vasculitis.
* Ability to express valid consent to study enrolment.
* For control group:
* Patients older than 18 years with the ability to express valid consent to study enrolment.
* Newly diagnosed acute visual impairment with GCA phenotypes (e.g. AION, CRAO) but without any correlation with vasculitis aetiology.
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant active viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections, including active or latent tuberculosis treated for less than 4 weeks and HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV)
/hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections, involving the eyes and orbital cavities.
* Concomitant systemic inflammations not attributable to GCA (inflammatory diseases in treatment-free remission are not excluded).
* Any other condition judged by the investigators to be a contraindication of eligibility
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Enrico Tombetti
Co-Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alessandro Invernizzi, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Visu-GCA Trial
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.