Evaluation of Perilesional Biopsy in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06482645

Last Updated: 2024-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different prostate biopsy schemes, including perilesional/regional systematic biopsy (PB/RSB) and combination of systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy (TB+SB).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does PB/RSB promote the accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer? What's the value of PB/RSB in improving the safety of prostate biopsy? Researchers will compare the cancer detection rates of PB/RSB and combination of TB+SB to explore the efficacy of different prostate biopsy schemes. They will evaluate the safety profile of different prostate biopsy schemes through the complication rates and postoperative quality of life.

Participants will:

Receive PB/RSB or TB+SB.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, combination of systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy (TB+SB) has been recommended for the diagnosis of patients with suspicious lesion found on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Although the combined biopsy approach could effectively detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), the increased number of biopsy cores would increase the risk of complications and decrease the postoperative quality of life. In recent years, urological and radiologic thinking has changed after realizing that systemic biopsies may be omitted when the chance of missing a clinically significant lesion is low, or when a systemic biopsy has already been done beforehand. More and more radiologists and urologists focused on the issue of optimization of prostate biopsy schemes. Previous studies found that the majority of csPCa were found within a band of 10-mm radius outside MRI lesions (the penumbra). Based on the penumbra theory, the perilesional/regional systematic biopsy (PB/RSB) has gradually received urologists' attention. Some studies demonstrated that the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate was not inferior to the combined biopsy with the benefits of using fewer biopsy cores. However, the safety profile warrants further evaluation, and there is still a lack of high-quality, prospective evidence for the PB/RSB schemes. Thus, this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PB/RSB schemes and the routine TB+SB schemes, provide high-quality evidence for the optimization of prostate biopsy schemes.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does PB/RSB promote the accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer? What is the value of PB/RSB in improving the safety of prostate biopsy? This prospective, multi-institution RCT compared the csPCa detection rates of PB/RSB and combination of TB+SB. Participants were prospectively enrolled at Peking University First Hospital (Beijing, China), Beijing Hospital (Beijing, China), and Shanghai East Hospital (Shanghai, China) from July 2024 to June 2025. Participants were randomly allocated to PB/RSB group and TB+SB group.

Researchers will compare the cancer detection rates of PB/RSB and combination of TB+SB to explore the efficacy of different prostate biopsy schemes. They will evaluate the safety profile of different prostate biopsy schemes through the complication rates and postoperative quality of life.

Participants will:

Receive PB/RSB or TB+SB.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Perilesional/regional systematic biopsy (PB/RSB) group

For each predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, urologists obtained nine cores at 5-mm intervals within and around the region of interest (penumbra). The location of these nine cores depended on the shape and location of the suspicious lesion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Perilesional/regional systematic biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position or lithotomy position. For each predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, urologists obtained nine cores at 5-mm intervals within and around the region of interest (penumbra). The location of these nine cores depended on the shape and location of the suspicious lesion.

Combination of systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy (TB+SB) group

For patients in the TB+SB group, three to five targeted biopsies from the lesion were performed within and around the predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, followed by fore-zone 12-core biopsy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Combination of systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position or lithotomy position. The ultrasound equipment used included a color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Hitachi HiVision, Philips Epiq 7), transrectal probes, and corresponding puncture needle guns. Color Doppler examination was performed from the base to the apex. Three to five targeted biopsies from the lesion were performed within and around the predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, followed by fore-zone 12-core biopsy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Perilesional/regional systematic biopsy

The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position or lithotomy position. For each predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, urologists obtained nine cores at 5-mm intervals within and around the region of interest (penumbra). The location of these nine cores depended on the shape and location of the suspicious lesion.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Combination of systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy

The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position or lithotomy position. The ultrasound equipment used included a color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Hitachi HiVision, Philips Epiq 7), transrectal probes, and corresponding puncture needle guns. Color Doppler examination was performed from the base to the apex. Three to five targeted biopsies from the lesion were performed within and around the predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, followed by fore-zone 12-core biopsy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The age of the patient is between 45 and 85.
* No previous biopsy.
* Patients with single suspicious lesion, complete multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data, qualified image quality control, suspicious lesions, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS V2.1) of \> 3.
* Patients were in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy, including patients with suspicious prostate nodes found by digital rectal examination (DRE), the suspicious lesions found by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) \>10ng/mL, tPSA 4-10ng/mL with free-to-total PSA ratio (f/tPSA) \<0.16 or PSA density (PSAD) \>0.15.
* The prostate biopsy pathological results were complete. The time interval between prostate biopsy and prostate mpMRI examination should not exceed one month.
* Patients with complete clinical information.

Exclusion Criteria

* The mpMRI data was unqualified or incomplete.
* Patients had received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, or surgery treatment before prostate mpMRI examination or prostate biopsy.
* Patients with previous biopsy.
* Patients with PI-RADS V2.1 of \< 4.
* Patients were not in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy.
* The patient could not cooperate to complete the prostate biopsy.
* The patients or their family members refused to participate in this study.
* Patients with incomplete clinical information.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai East Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University First Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LIU Yi

Associate chief physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yi LIU

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University First Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University First Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yi LIU

Role: CONTACT

+86 13611035261

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Baowei Zhang

Role: primary

+86 83572466

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PB-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.