Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Versus Low-intensity Laser on Motor Conduction Velocity of the Common Peroneal Nerve Post Burn
NCT ID: NCT06478914
Last Updated: 2024-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-01
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of NMES in improving the motor conduction velocity (MCV) of the neuropathic common peroneal nerve post burn.
2. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of LIL in improving the motor conduction velocity (MCV) of the neuropathic common peroneal nerve post burn.
3. To detect which one of both was the better and most effective than the other in improving the motor conduction velocity (MCV) of the neuropathic common peroneal nerve post burn.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radial Shockwave Versus Low Level Laser Therapy in Patients With Chronic Piriformis Muscle Syndrome
NCT06762197
Photobiomodulation Therapy on Pain and Range of Motion Following Flexor Tendon Repair
NCT06761950
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Via the Peroneal Nerve Reduces Muscle Soreness Following Intermittent Exercise
NCT02018211
Efficacy of EPSW Plus HILT on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Post Burn Injury
NCT05876442
Mirror Therapy Combined With Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Injury
NCT06209632
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The need for this study developed from the lack of quantitative knowledge and information in the published studies about the application of both NMES and LIL to improve the neuropathic common peroneal nerve postburn.
The significance of this study arises from the rarity of information about the effectiveness of both NMES and LIL on the neuropathic common peroneal nerve post-burn, as well as the precise dosage and frequency of treatment required to promote improvement of the neuropathic common peroneal nerve post burn.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NEMS group (group A)
the first experimental group consisted of 30 patients, to which neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) was applied
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
NMES unit manufactured by Enraf-Holland was be used to administer the neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) The study involved adjusting the patient's hips, knees, and ankles to achieve a comfortable position. Two electrodes of NMES were used in the first study group and a placebo in the control group. The electrodes were placed on the popliteal fossa and fibular head, and each session was conducted for 15 minutes daily for 2 months.
LIL group (group B)
The second experimental group consisted of 30 patients to which the low intensity laser (LIL) was applied
low-intensity laser therapy (LILT)
The laser unit is a small, hand-held, class III laser product manufactured by Laserex Technology Pty Ltd Australia. It offers continuous and pulsed laser therapy, with continuous therapy being the most effective. The device has a maximum average power of 5 milliwatts, a wavelength of 820 nm, and a power density of 0.39 W/cm2.
Patients were treated as outpatients, receiving full explanations about the purpose, therapeutic, and physiological benefits of low-intensity laser therapy (LILT). They were relaxed in supine position, with hips and knees adjusted. The patient was irradiated in a continuous mode and direct contact method, 3 times per week for 2 months, at 1-cm intervals and across the surface in grids. The laser applicator was applied to the surface, maintaining contact for maximum penetration.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
NMES unit manufactured by Enraf-Holland was be used to administer the neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) The study involved adjusting the patient's hips, knees, and ankles to achieve a comfortable position. Two electrodes of NMES were used in the first study group and a placebo in the control group. The electrodes were placed on the popliteal fossa and fibular head, and each session was conducted for 15 minutes daily for 2 months.
low-intensity laser therapy (LILT)
The laser unit is a small, hand-held, class III laser product manufactured by Laserex Technology Pty Ltd Australia. It offers continuous and pulsed laser therapy, with continuous therapy being the most effective. The device has a maximum average power of 5 milliwatts, a wavelength of 820 nm, and a power density of 0.39 W/cm2.
Patients were treated as outpatients, receiving full explanations about the purpose, therapeutic, and physiological benefits of low-intensity laser therapy (LILT). They were relaxed in supine position, with hips and knees adjusted. The patient was irradiated in a continuous mode and direct contact method, 3 times per week for 2 months, at 1-cm intervals and across the surface in grids. The laser applicator was applied to the surface, maintaining contact for maximum penetration.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients were approximately of the same age (from 20 to 35 years old).
* All patients were conscious.
* All of them were non-smokers and they will be under own prescribed medications described by their physicians.
* They received another physical therapy electromodality except NMES and LIL as well as the traditional physical therapy in the form of 5 minutes of deep stroking (Effleurage) maneuver for the affected lower limb before the beginning of the MCV recording to eliminate the temperature-related variability
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who suffer from skin diseases, diabetes, varicose veins, and peripheral vascular diseases will be excluded from the study.
* Pregnant patients or who presented with active malignancy will be excluded from the study.
* Patients who suffer from hyperthyroidism, haemorrhage, acute viral diseases, acute tuberculosis, mental disorders or those with pace makers will be excluded from the study
20 Years
35 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Basma Rabie Ahmed Fadel
Basma Rabie Ahmed
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
out-clinics of Kasr-El-Aini
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
basma PHD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.