Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-24
2025-06-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prior to this, we wish to undertake this pilot qualitative study to better understand patients' perspectives on the acceptability of the procedure. Prostatectomy carries risks, with potential impact on erectile function and urinary continence. In this year-long project we will conduct up to 20 semi-structured interviews with patients and public to explore acceptability and to identify informational and support needs envisaged by men contemplating prophylactic prostatectomy. We will invite people aged over 18 to take part. We will include a wide range of perspectives including those at higher genetic risk or a strong family history of prostate cancer, as well as those with unknown or normal genetic risk factors. We will include people from different socio-economic backgrounds and those of black ethnicity who carry a higher risk. They will be recruited from existing prostate cancer screening studies and from community organisations with expertise in working with under-served communities.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Precision Medicine in the Prostate Cancer Care Pathway
NCT04763317
Analysing Outcomes After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Carriers of Rare Germline Mutations
NCT02705846
Study of How People Make Decisions About Prostate Cancer Risk
NCT07197723
Study of Blood and Tumor Samples From Men With an Inherited Risk of Prostate Cancer
NCT00959023
Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer
NCT00490763
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aetiology of the disease remains very poorly understood. The substantial worldwide variation in incidence rates suggests that lifestyle risk factors are important. To date, however, no definite lifestyle risk factors have been identified. Aside from demographic factors, risk factors for prostate cancer include genetic factors arising from rare highly-penetrant mutations, and/or from common variants conferring more moderate risks. A number of genome wide associations studies have shown that a combination of common variants can also contribute to substantial risks. Furthermore, these also interact with rarer variants such as BRCA2. The top 1% of the risk distribution from common variants confers 5-11 times the relative risk of developing prostate cancer. These interact with the risks from BRCA2 mutations to increase the lifetime risk from 18% to greater than 60%. Prostate cancer in BRCA2 carriers occurs at a young age and may be more aggressive, and the optimal management is unknown (Nyberg et al, 2020). The impact of BRCA2 on people from African backgrounds is not known, however this group may be at even higher risk of prostate cancer.
The IMPACT study has investigated targeted prostate screening in BRCA2 carriers, showing a clear benefit of PSA-based screening in the early detection of clinically important prostate cancers (Page et al, 2019). The IMPACT team are working with the National Screening Committee to review their current PSA screening recommendations. However, this screening has only looked at risk stratification based on BRCA2 mutation status alone and has not investigated the impact of screening on people with BRCA2 incorporating a calculation of their common genetic variants, or 'polygenic risk score'.
Prophylactic, or 'risk-reducing' mastectomy is a well-established treatment for healthy women with a family history of breast cancer, a personal history of breast cancer together with a family history, or people with a known BRCA1/2 mutation to reduce their risk of developing breast cancer in the future (Bertozzi et al, 2023). Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy is offered to reduce their risk of breast and gynaecological cancers (Giannakeas \& Narod, 2018). There is a clear mortality benefit from undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy, and evidence to support that prophylactic mastectomy reduces mortality in younger people undergoing this procedure. High levels of satisfaction and quality of life following these procedures is also reported (Grandi et al, 2023; Razdan et al, 2016).
There is no such evidence as yet of the benefits of performing similar surgery for people at a higher genetic risk of developing prostate cancer, without evidence of the disease. However, this is a question often posed in clinic by people who carry pathogenic variants in BRCA2 who have at least a 25-60% chance of developing prostate cancer in their lifetime. We propose to develop a trial to recruit people to a feasibility study offering prophylactic prostatectomy based on their high genetic risk (combined high polygenic risk score and BRCA2 carrier status). Prior to this trial we wish to undertake this pilot qualitative study to better understand patients' perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of the study. Prostatectomy is not without its own risks and the impact on quality of life namely, its effects on erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence and consequent psychological impact of living with these side-effects. Appropriate counselling of people prior to their recruitment for such a study is key, and we feel that interviews seeking the views and perspectives of patients and the public (PPIE) would be imperative in order to inform the design of a future study with the necessary input from those affected.
There is no evidence as yet of the benefits of performing prophylactic prostatectomy for people at a higher genetic risk of developing prostate cancer, without evidence of the disease. People who carry a mutation in BRCA2 often ask why a prophylactic prostatectomy isn't offered when they may benefit from this procedure, and the research team propose to develop a feasibility study in the future. Research conducted with people undergoing prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral salpingo oophorectomy suggests that there are many nuanced personal factors to consider when providing information and advice about such an intervention (McGarrigle et al, 2021). These factors reflect the need for balance between reduced cancer worry and post-surgical side effects and potential emotional and inter-personal impact.
Before designing a feasibility study, it is therefore crucial to understand the likely factors that would influence people's decision-making and the potential psychosocial impact. This study will explore people's understandings, views and opinions on prophylactic prostatectomy in order to identify informational and support needs when planning future research.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Qualitative Research Interviews
Research Interviews
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Unaffected people (ie no previous prostate surgery) assessed to be living at higher risk of prostate cancer based on either:
1. Carrying a variant in a higher risk gene (eg BRCA2) AND/OR
2. Having a strong family history of prostate cancer AND/OR
3. Being of Black African or Black Caribbean ancestry
* AND/OR People who have undergone a prostatectomy for prostate cancer (as part of cancer treatment
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
OTHER
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CCR5979
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.