Identifying the Best Follow up Approach for People Who Have Had Treatment to Cure Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT07264088

Last Updated: 2025-12-04

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Total Enrollment: 100000 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2026-03-31
• Study Completion Date: 2027-07-31

Brief Summary

Over 20,000 patients a year in the UK get surgery or radiotherapy to cure their prostate cancer. These men then undergo regular check-ups to manage potential side effects and see if cancer recurs so it can be treated quickly. The organisation of these check-ups varies across the country as it is not known which approach is best. The four different established approaches are (i) check-ups performed in hospital outpatients by the same team that provided treatment; (ii) patients seen regularly by their GP with hospital referral as necessary; (iii) planned shared care between general practice and hospital follow up; or (iv) patients supported to provide checks on themselves (self-care) and reaching out to a doctor or a nurse when required. This study will compare these options to establish which is best for patients and makes the best use of the NHS resources.

Detailed Description

This is a pragmatic, prospective, propensity-matched, cohort study using routine data, with an embedded patient survey, economic evaluation, and qualitative and preference studies. Individual sites will be classified according to one of the four follow up strategies to compare outcomes in a natural experiment. Individual participants will be clustered within their treating hospital.

The main cohort for the study will be identified from the National Disease Registration Service Cancer Registry. Data on treatments, diagnoses, clinic attendances and other events that occur in secondary care from 3 years prior to diagnosis will be extracted from databases linked to the Cancer Registry including Cancer Pathway, Radiotherapy Dataset (RTDS), Systemic Anti-Cancer dataset (SACT) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). These datasets are referred to collectively as 'HES-linked data'. HES-linked data will be collected from 3 years prior to diagnosis, to enable analyses to be adjusted for patient medical history and pattern of health service use prior to diagnosis with prostate cancer, to the latest available date (expected to be 31 December 2026).

To identify the most clinically and cost-effective follow up strategy for patients, five interrelated work packages (WPs) will address specific objectives:

• WP1: Determine safety and clinical effectiveness of different follow up strategies

Stage 1: The utility of HES-linked data to study treatment for prostate cancer recurrence will be validated. It will be confirmed if databases contain the parameters required and are complete enough to robustly assess outcomes in secondary care including time to treatment for cancer recurrence and treatment for side-effects from primary treatment. Detailed statistical methods and computer code will be developed for determining whether follow up strategies are equivalent for treatment of recurrence, including methods for dealing with missing patients and treatment variables. A preliminary investigation of hospital adherence to stated follow up strategies will be conducted.

Stage 2: All primary and secondary outcomes will be measured using both HES-linked datasets and information collected through the patient survey in WP2. The methods developed in stage 1 will be used to assess the equivalence of the four follow up strategies for the primary outcome of treatment for cancer recurrence at 3 years, the key secondary outcome of time to hospital treatment for cancer recurrence, and remaining secondary outcomes.

-WP2: Measure side effects of prostate cancer treatments, patient quality of life and recurrence outcomes not captured in routine data

A survey will be designed and administered to capture data from a subgroup of study participants on adverse effects of initial cancer treatment, how those adverse effects were managed, health service utilisation and HRQoL. The survey will ask patients whether and when they received hormone therapy for prostate cancer recurrence, providing data for WP1 on recurrence treatments not captured in HES-linked databases.

-WP3: Identify key patient perspectives on the important features of follow-up

A qualitative interview study will be conducted with patients with lived experience of prostate cancer and follow up, purposively sampling geographic spread, socioeconomic class and ethnicity (WP3 is sponsored by University of Aberdeen and is described in a separate protocol and has separate ethics approvals). Early findings will inform the design of the Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) to be deployed in WP5.

-WP4: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of each follow up strategy

The use of primary and secondary health care services during follow up to estimate the costs of the four follow up strategies will be assessed using HES-linked and patient survey data. An economic evaluation model will be developed to compare the patient lifetime costs and outcomes of the four strategies, and identify the approach that provides the best value for money for the NHS.

-WP5: Define patient preferences for follow-up

A DCE will be conducted to understand how patients might respond to follow up strategies with different attributes and elicit patient preferences. Questions for the DCE will be designed using early qualitative findings (WP3) and will be included as a module in the patient survey (WP2) for a subgroup of survey recipients.

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Hospital based follow up

Exclusively hospital led follow up, face-to-face or remotely by the specialist treating team.

Hospital based follow up

Intervention Type: OTHER

Exclusively hospital led follow up, face-to-face or remotely by the specialist treating team.

Primary care based follow up

After the initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and exclusively managed by (non-specialist) general practices (GP or nurse led) in face-to-face or remote appointments, with hospital referral as necessary.

Primary care based follow up

Intervention Type: OTHER

After the initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and exclusively managed by (non-specialist) general practices (GP or nurse led) in face-to-face or remote appointments, with hospital referral as necessary.

Planned shared care follow up

An ongoing combination of general practice and hospital management

Planned shared care follow up

Intervention Type: OTHER

An ongoing combination of general practice and hospital management

Self-management

After initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and managed remotely, with no scheduled review. A tracking system monitors prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests performed in primary care or secondary care. Patients access support workers for remote consultation to discuss symptoms and request further specialist management as required.

Self-management

Intervention Type: OTHER

After initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and managed remotely, with no scheduled review. A tracking system monitors prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests performed in primary care or secondary care. Patients access support workers for remote consultation to discuss symptoms and request further specialist management as required.

Interventions

Hospital based follow up

Exclusively hospital led follow up, face-to-face or remotely by the specialist treating team.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Primary care based follow up

After the initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and exclusively managed by (non-specialist) general practices (GP or nurse led) in face-to-face or remote appointments, with hospital referral as necessary.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Planned shared care follow up

An ongoing combination of general practice and hospital management

Intervention Type: OTHER

Self-management

After initial hospital follow up, patients are discharged and managed remotely, with no scheduled review. A tracking system monitors prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests performed in primary care or secondary care. Patients access support workers for remote consultation to discuss symptoms and request further specialist management as required.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

All hospitals in England that provide radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy or focal therapy for prostate cancer and are identified by clinicians as receiving one of the four follow up strategies of interest will be eligible for inclusion in the study.

Individual patients satisfying the following criteria will be eligible for inclusion:

• Having newly-diagnosed non-metastatic, clinically localised prostate cancer (ICD-10 code C61) in the Cancer Registry between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2023;
• Age 18 or over at diagnosis;
• Completed primary curative treatment at an eligible hospital between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2023 with either: radical radiotherapy +/- hormones, or radical prostatectomy with curative intent +/- lymphadenectomy, or focal therapy, in keeping with local practice;
• Alive with no disease progression or metastasis 6 months after the date of completion of primary curative treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

• Men who are treated for metastatic cancer; or receiving palliative prostate cancer care;
• Men who have opted out of their data being used as part of national routine data sets will be excluded (https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-data-opt-out).

Recruitment to the survey component of the study will be limited to a sub-cohort of eligible participants that additionally meet the following criteria:

• Alive;
• Have achieved between three to four and a half years of follow up (from completion of initial curative treatment) during the survey period.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: MALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Aberdeen

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Cardiff University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Sheffield

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Southampton

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

North Bristol NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: collaborator

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Rakesh Heer, BMed Sci MB BS MRCS PhD FRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Imperial College London

Locations

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

London, , United Kingdom

Countries

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Diana Johnson, BSc (Hon)

Role: CONTACT

followup@abdn.ac.uk

+44 (0) 1224 438144

Facility Contacts

Diana Johnson

Role: primary

followup@abdn.ac.uk

+44 (0) 1224438144

Other Identifiers

NIHR150376

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

342362

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

25/LO/0753

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

25_CAG_0127

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

181848

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id