Trunk Rehabilitation Compared to Core Stability in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT06447571

Last Updated: 2024-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BACKGROUND Balance, gait, community mobility, and risk of falls are often associated with trunk impairment among people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Consequently, there is a pressing need for interventions addressing these concerns and exploring the potential effects of trunk rehabilitation.

LONG-TERM GOAL Offering guidance for effective plan selection, potentially included in rehabilitation guidelines for PwMS.

HYPOTHESIS Trunk exercises performed in multiplanar movement on unstable surfaces incorporated with dual-tasks (DT) could improve the functional outcomes more than standard one-plane core stability exercises.

SPECIFIC AIMS Investigating the effectiveness of trunk rehabilitation in PwMS and determining the optimal intervention strategy.

METHODS 50 PwMS randomly assigned into two groups. Trunk Group received trunk exercises on unstable surfaces with DT training, while the Core Group underwent standard one-plane core stability exercises on stable surfaces without DT. Additionally, both received conventional treatment. Primary outcome was the trunk impairment scale (TIS). Secondary outcomes included the Berg balance scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Modified Falls Efficacy (FES), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI).

SIGNIFICANCE Enhancing our understanding of trunk exercises' benefits and providing valuable guidance to clinicians for choosing the optimal treatment plan.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is a lack of comprehensive trunk rehabilitation protocols within the field of multiple sclerosis. The existing studies mostly focus on core stability, pelvic muscles, or alternative methods. Consequently, the aim was to develop a protocol to investigate the potential positive effects of trunk rehabilitation. Drawing from our review of relevant literature, investigators in this study have developed a trunk training protocol that focuses on multiplanar movements carried out on unstable surfaces and additionally, incorporated dual-task training (DT), which adds a layer of complexity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis Trunk Physical Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
First visit, a blinded physiotherapist will evaluate the patient, then they will be randomly divided into two groups using a computer-generated system.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trunk Group

Trunk exercises in multiplanar movement coupled with dual tasks on unstable surfaces.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trunk Rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

Activating and strengthening the trunk muscles.

Core stability Group

Standard Core stability exercises carried in one plane on stable surfaces without dual tasks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Core Stability

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard core stability fucus on lower trunk.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trunk Rehabilitation

Activating and strengthening the trunk muscles.

Intervention Type OTHER

Core Stability

Standard core stability fucus on lower trunk.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinically diagnosed with MS (McDonald's criteria)
* Able to walk 5 meters without assistance.
* No relapse in the past 2 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Recent surgery.
* Cognitive or psychological dysfunctions.
* Diagnosis of any other systematic disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Abdulaziz University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shatha Mukhtar

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Majed M Albadi, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

King Abdulaziz University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

King Abdulaziz University

Jeddah, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Trunk Rehabilitation in MS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.